East Asian Journal of Business Economics (EAJBE) (동아시아경상학회지)

East Asia Business Economics Association (동아시아경상학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Union Characteristics and its Impact on Absenteeism in the Context of Metal Industry in South Korea

  • Kim, Joohee (Department of Management and Leadership, School of Business, Campus Monterrey, Tecnologico de Monterrey)
  • Received : 2019.05.18
  • Accepted : 2019.06.13
  • Published : 2019.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to examine whether key differences in characteristics of unions have significant implications for absenteeism. To uncover what characteristics of union made workers make decisions to be absent, this study used such key dimensions of unionism as democracy, cooperative strategy of a union, and d density rate. Research design and methodology - The research model of this study is that absenteeism has positive relations with union's democracy and density. But it has negative relations with union cooperative strategy. This study was conducted by survey method on 333local unionized business entities of metal industry in South Korea. Results - The result shows that significant and positive relationship between unions with high density rates, democracy and absenteeism which is in line with the argument of the previous studies. Different from the expectation, the hypotheses 2, it has been shown that there is positive relation between cooperative strategy of union and the decision of workers to be absent. Conclusions - Employers with unions with high density rates could not fully exercise disciplinary power against those workers absent at workplace since a strong union shields them effectively from punishments by employers.

Keywords

References

  1. Addison, J. T., & Belfield, C. R. (2004). Union voice. Journal of Labor Research, 25(4), 563-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-004-1012-y
  2. Allen, S. G. (1981). An empirical model of work attendance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 63(1), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924220
  3. Allen, S. G. (1984). Trade unions, absenteeism, and exit-voice. ILR Review, 37(3), 331-345. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979398403700301
  4. Barbash, J. (1969). Rationalization in American unions. In Gerald G. Somers, Essays in industrial relations theory (pp. 147-62). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
  5. Benson, J. (1996). A typology of Japanese enterprise unions. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34(3), 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1996.tb00480.x
  6. Bok, D. C., & Dunlop, J. T. (1970). Labor and the American community. New York: Commerce Clearing House.
  7. Chaudhury, M., & Ng, I. (1992). Absenteeism predictors: least squares, rank regression, and model selection results. Canadian Journal of Economics, 25(3), 615-635. https://doi.org/10.2307/135735
  8. Craft, J. A. (1991). Unions, bureaucracy, and change: Old dogs learn new tricks very slowly. Journal of Labor Research, 12(4), 393-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685435
  9. Freeman, Richard B. and James L. Medoff. (1984). What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books.
  10. Garcia-Serrano, C., & Malo, M. A. (2004). Absenteeism, exit-voice, and collective bargaining. Unpublished paper.
  11. Goerke, L., & Pannenberg, M. (2011). Trade union membership and dismissals. Labour Economics, 18(6), 810-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2011.06.012
  12. Goerke, L., & Pannenberg, M. (2015). Trade union membership and sickness absence: Evidence from a sick pay reform. Labour Economics, 33(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.02.004
  13. Lee, Joohee. (1998). Micro-Corporatism in South Korea: A comparative analysis of enterprise-Level industrial relations. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 19(1), 421-443
  14. Leigh, J. P. (1981). The effects of union membership on absence from work due to illness. Journal of Labor Research, 2(1), 329-336 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685291
  15. Leigh, J. P. (1985). The effects of Unemployment and the business cycle on absenteeism. Journal of Economics and Business, 37(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-6195(85)90014-1
  16. Leigh, J. P. (1986). Correlates of absence from work due to illness. Human Relations, 39(1), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678603900105
  17. Luchak, A.A., & Gellatly, I.R. (1996). Exit-voice and employee absenteeism: A critique of the industrial relations literature. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 9(2), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02622252
  18. Mastekaasa, A. (2013). Unionization and certified sickness absence: Norwegian evidence. ILR Review, 66(1), 117-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979391306600105
  19. Milkovich, George & Newman, Jerry. (2002). Compensation (7th edition). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  20. Morantz, A. (2009). The elusive union safety effect: Toward a new empirical research agenda. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Labor and Employment Relations Association 130(pp. 12-32). San Francisco, California, USA
  21. Robinson, A. M., & Clive Smallman. (2006). The contemporary British workplace: A safer and healthier place? Work, Employment and Society, 20(1), 87-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017006061275
  22. Sanpe, E., & Redman, T. (2004). Exchange or convenant? The nature of the member-union relationship. Indudstrial Relations, 43(4), 855-873.
  23. Tompa, E., Scott-Marshall, H., & Fang, M. (2011). Social protection and the employment contract: The impact on work absence. Work, 37(3), 251-60.
  24. Veliziotis, M. (2010). Unionization and sickness absence from work in the UK (No. 2010-15). ISER Working Paper Series.