부모자녀건강학회지 (Korean Parent-Child Health Journal)

부모자녀건강학회 (The Academic Society of Parent-Child Health)
권호 표지

인지와 낙관적 편견이 여대생의 산부인과 방문의도에 미치는 영향

Influence of Cognition and Optimistic Bias on the Intention to Visiting Obstetrics and Gynecology of Women College Students

  • 투고 : 2019.07.28
  • 심사 : 2019.08.20
  • 발행 : 2019.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study was conducted to identify the intention of visiting obstetrics and gynecology of female college students by considering their perception and optimistic bias. Methods: The study included a total of 135 female college students under the age of 25. The data collection period is a descriptive research study conducted online from April 8, 2019 to April 16, 2019. The collected data were analyzed using the correlation of t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation and multiple regression using SPSS 20.0. Results: The degree of intention of behavior for visits to obstetrics and gynecology was $3.10{\pm}1.06points$ on average. Intention of behavior for visits to obstetrics and gynecology had significant variance depending on sexual experience (t=3.09, p<.001). The intention of behavior for visits to obstetrics and gynecology had positive correlations with the cognition of visits to obstetrics and gynecology (r=.422, p<.001), the optimism bias (r=.419, p<.001). Influence factors emerged the optimism bias, cognition and sexual experience with explanatory power of 30.4%. Conclusion: The results of this paper can be used to prepare the basic data for the development of educational programs to promote preventive gynecological visits of female college students. Through this, the preventive screening rate, the quality of reproductive health in women's lives.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lee SR. Study on the measures to support the management of pregnant health before pregnant women in the childhood. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2015. KiHASA, 211-214.
  2. Min JW, Cha HW. The effect of fear and social norm on unmarried womans intention of visiting gynecology hospital application of extended theory of planned behavior and interpersonal communication. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies. 2017;61(1):217-250 https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2017.61.1.007
  3. Weistein ND. Why it won't happen to me: Perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility. Health Psychology, Health Psychol. 1984;3(5):431-457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.3.5.431
  4. Cho SY. A Study on the relationship between cervical cancer preventive behavioral intentions and optimistic bias among korean female college students. Korean Journal of Communication Studies. 2018;26(3):101-124. https://doi.org/10.23875/kca.26.3.5
  5. Sohn Y, Lee B. An efficacy of social cognitive behavior model based on the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies. 2012;56(6):127-161.
  6. Ku Y, Noh GY. A study of the effects of self-efficancy and optimistic bias on breast cancer screening intention-focusing on the health belief model (HBM). Ewha Journal of Social Sciences. 2018;34(2):73-109 https://doi.org/10.16935/EJSS.2018.34.2.003
  7. Ajzen I. Perceived behavioral control, self efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2002;32(4):665-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
  8. Lee SO. Effect of sex knowledge, intention to visit obstetricsgynecology, awareness of visit of female college students on reproductive heath promoting behavior. Journal of The Korean Society of Maternal And Child Health. 2019;23(2):84-92. https://doi.org/10.21896/jksmch.2019.23.2.84
  9. Ajzen I. From intention to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl, & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1985. p. 11-39.
  10. Jeff K, Charles EI Jr, George S, Susan GM. Optimistic bias in adolescents with hemophilia. Pediatric Research. 1987;21:176. https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-198704010-00057
  11. Jung EC, Jin CH. Breast and cervical cancer communication channels and screening intention. Korean Communication Association. 2011;19(20):139-162.
  12. Kim BC, Choi YH. Cultural difference study on optimistic bias of AIDS: Comparison between Korea and Kenya. Korean Society for Advertising Education. 2006;0:139-152.
  13. Park SH, Lee SH, Ham EM. The relationship between optimistic bias about health crisis and health behavior. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2008;38(3):403-409. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2008.38.3.403
  14. Weistein ND. Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1980;39(5):806-820. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806
  15. Weistein ND. Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: Conclusions from a community-wide sample. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1987;10(5):481-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00846146
  16. Alicke MD, Klotz ML, Breitenbecher DL, Yurak TJ, Vredenburg DS. Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995; 68(5):804-825. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.804
  17. Cha DP. Understanding binge-drinking: a test of the theory of planned behavior. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies. 2005;49(3):346-372.
  18. Han MJ. Theoretical consideration of the action of the receptor's optimistic bias. Media & Society. 1998;5-28.