Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis on the Change of Existing Building-related System in Urban Parks

도시공원 내 기존 건축물 제도의 변천 과정 분석

  • Received : 2019.08.07
  • Accepted : 2019.10.13
  • Published : 2019.10.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Existing buildings in urban parks are a kind of thing that has been settled and occupied on the site of an unexecuted park. The aim of this study is to identify nature by analyzing the causality and path-dependency through the transformation of the relevant system. The scope of the study was set up as a system for the occupancy of urban parks from 1934 when the building restriction system was established to 2000 when purchase claim (매수청구권) was introduced. The method of study was to get correlation by harmonizing the external and internal mechanisms affecting the relevant institution. The related system showed a modest change in the fourth stage, polymerizing the initial system. In the 1950s and 1960s, the existing buildings in urban parks were 'disguised' by government and the 'regulation' principle was applied since 1967. In the 1980s, the principle of 'protection' and 'support' for parks was added, but in the 1990s, the principle of regulation began to be lifted as the long-term unexecuted urban park (장기미집행 도시공원) problem continued for more than 60 years. Although the public concept of land ownership (토지공개념) has worked strongly for nearly 30 years since 1960, the system has developed into a form of deregulation since 1980. The nature of the relevant institution is first, dependent on the higher-level system and vertical. Second, it implies a conflict of restrictions and acceptance. Third, it is a temporary measure of the park problem. Therefore, the relevant system has long been enhancing the encroachment requirements on urban parks, so fundamental readjustment is needed in the future.

Keywords

References

  1. Asiskovitch, S. (2009). Digging their Own Graves: Unexpected Consequences of Institutional Design and Welfare State Changes, Social Policy & Administration, 43(3), 226-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2009.00659.x
  2. Cho, D. (2013). A Study on the changing process of rental housing supply policy in South Korea, Space and Environment, 23(4), 58-101.
  3. Cho, K. (2009). A study on the protection of human rights at the execution of forced eviction, Study on the American Constitution, 20(2), 345-375.
  4. Cho, M. (2011). Cultural Urban Regeneration and the Recovery of Publicness: Critical Reflections on the Korean Practices of Urban Regeneration, Space and Environment, 21(3), 39-65.
  5. Choi, M. (2016). Green governmentality approaches to the study of ecotourism in South Korea, Space and Environment, 26(4), 229-266.
  6. Compbell, J. (2004). Globalization and Institutional Change, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
  7. Hall, P. (1986). Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press.
  8. Hong S., & Chung S. (2016). Activation of Private Sector Participatory Development System for Urban Park, Korea Real Estate Academy Review, 67, 87-101.
  9. Immergut, E. (1998). The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism, Politics and Society, 26(1), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329298026001002
  10. Immergut, E., & Anderson, K. (2008). Historical Institutionalism and West European Politics. West European Politics, 31(1-2), 345-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701835165
  11. Jang, M. (1974). Landscape Architecture of the Park and Greenbelt in the Urban, Urban Affair Monthly Magazine, 96, 31-39.
  12. Jeon, B., & Park, I. (2014). The Changes in Land Use Plans of SaJikDan Area in the 20th Century from the Perspective of Historical Institutionalism, Journal of the Architecture Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 30(12), 185-196. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2014.30.12.185
  13. Jung, T. (1991). Amendment of the Urban Planning Act, Urban Affair Monthly Magazine, 278, 92-102.
  14. Kang, S., & Jang, Y. (2004). Korea Modern Urban Park History, Seoul, Dewangsa.
  15. Kim, D. (1990). A Study on the Changes of Public Park in Korea, Ph.D. Dissertation, Kyung Hee University.
  16. Kim, H., & Kim, D. (2016). A Study on Business Value for the Creation of a Private Park regarding Long-term Non-executed Urban Parks. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 44(5), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2016.44.5.081
  17. Kim, J. (2006). Discontinuous Evolution of the Korean Cinema Policy Regime : Multi-level and Multidimensionality of Institutions and Multi-facets of Institutional Change, The Korean Journal of Public Administration, 15(2), 185-216.
  18. Kim, J., & Suh, S. (2014). A Study on the Policy Change of Sejong City Construction from a Path Dependency Perspective, Korea Planner's Association, 49(3), 5-29.
  19. Kim, K. (2017). Issuing Municipal Bonds to Pay Compensation for Lands and Selecting Compensation Priority Areas for Urban Parks and Greenbelts unexecuted in the Long-Term, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 45(3), 92-106. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2017.45.3.092
  20. Kim, S. (2010). An Exploratory Study on Administrative Execution by Proxy, Public Law Journal, 11(3), 183-209. https://doi.org/10.31779/plj.11.3.201008.007
  21. Kim, T. (2015). Critical Review of Historical Institutionalism Research Trend. Korean Public Administration Review, 49(4), 57-96. https://doi.org/10.18333/KPAR.49.4.57
  22. Kim, Y., Choi, H., & Lee, Y. (1998). A Study on transitional process of the architecture law established in the Republic of Korea-focused on transitional process since 1980-. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 14(10), 203-210.
  23. Kwon, Y., & Hong, S. (2018). A study on mediative compensation for the urban park determined by urban or Gun management plans, Public land law review, 82, 41-65.
  24. Lee, S. (2009). The changes and problems of Korea land reform legislation. LAND LAW REVIEW, 25(1), pp.1-23.
  25. Lee, Y., & Lee, S. (2018). Conflict between Public Interest and Private Interest: Application of the Extended Institutional Resource Regime(IRR) in Case of Long-term Unplanned Urban Parks, Modern Society and Public Administration, 28(3), 87-114.
  26. Noh, D. (1970). Enactment of Highway Act and amendment of Road Act, Legal Monthly, 1970-4, 83-93.
  27. Oh, C. (2018). The Changes and Issues of the Urban Park Law -1934 to 2017-, Ph.D. Dissertation, Seoul National University.
  28. Park, M. (2000). Explanation of the revised Urban Planning Act (I) - Disposal of Long-Term Unexecutive Facilities, Urban Affair Monthly Magazine, 375, 78-90.
  29. Peters, G., Pierre, J., & King, D. (2005). The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism, The Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1275-1300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00360.x
  30. Ryu, K., & Suh, S. (2014) A Study on the Changing Process of Land Readjustment Projects from the Perspective of Historical Institutionalism, Space and Environment, 24(2), 178-219.
  31. Seo, K. (2019). The Improvement Direction of Compensation System by Restrictions for Public Use, Public land law review, 85, 93-121.
  32. Shin, G. (1999). Causes and Problem Recognition of Long-term Unexecuted Facilities, Urban Affair Monthly Magazine, 369, 21-33.
  33. Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (eds., 2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, New York, Oxford University Press.
  34. Thelen, K. (1999) Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics, Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369-404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369