DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

석고 패널이 부착된 천장 시스템의 내진성능 평가를 위한 3축 진동실험

Triaxial Shake Table Test about Seismic Performance of Ceiling System with Gypsum Panels

  • 박해용 (부산대학교 지진방재연구센터) ;
  • 전법규 (부산대학교 지진방재연구센터) ;
  • 김재봉 (부산대학교 지진방재연구센터) ;
  • 김민욱 (부산대학교 지진방재연구센터)
  • 투고 : 2019.07.10
  • 심사 : 2019.09.20
  • 발행 : 2019.10.30

초록

In this study, a full scale 3-axes shake table test for M-bar and T-bar type ceilings commonly used in the country was conducted. Through damage inspection during the test, seismic performance of ceilings according to variables, such as clearance between wall mold and ceiling as well as existence of facilities, was evaluated. A test frame consisted of square hollow section members was used for the shake table test. The experimental method was performed as a fragility test using required response spectrum described in ICC-ES AC156. In the case of architectural nonstructural component that contain ceilings, it mainly is evaluated the performance by post-test visual inspection. For the evaluation of seismic performance of ceilings, this study classified and defined damaged items for targeted ceiling system referring to illustrative damage according to nonstructural performance levels accordance with ASCE 41 and previous studies. And proposed illustrative damage items classification was utilized to compare the degree of the damage according to experimental variables. The experiment results confirmed that differences in boundary conditions due to the clearance at wall mold and the installation of facilities had a significant effect on the seismic performance of the ceiling.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 국토교통부

참고문헌

  1. FEMA (2012). Reducing the Risk of Nonstructural Earthquake Damage (FEMA E-74), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  2. KDS (2019). Seismic Design Code of Buildings (KDS 41 17 00: 2019), Korean Design Standard.
  3. ANCO (1983). Seismic Hazard Assessment of Nonstructural Ceiling Component, NSF Report NO. CEE-8114155.
  4. Rihal S., & Granneman G. (1984). Experimental Investigation of the Dynamic Behavior of Building Partitions and Suspended Ceilings during Earthquakes, Report No. 91/13, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, CA.
  5. Yao G.C. (2000). Seismic Performance of Derect Hung Suspended Ceiling Systems, J. Archit. Eng., 6(1), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2000)6:1(6)
  6. Badillo H., Whittaker A.S., Reinhorn A.M., & Cimellaro G.P. (2006). Seismic Fragility of Suspended Ceiling System, Technical Reprot MCEER-06-0001, MCEER, University at Buffalo-the State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
  7. ICC (2007). Acceptance Criteria for Seismic Qualification by Shake-table Testing of Non-structural Components and Systems (ICC-ES AC-156). Whittier, CA: International Code Council.
  8. Reinhorn A.M., Ryu K.P., & Maddaloni G. (2010). Modeling and Seismic Evaluation of Nonstructural Components: Testing Frame for Experimental Evaluation of Suspended Ceiling Systems, Technical Reprot MCEER-10-0004, MCEER, University at Buffalo-the State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
  9. ASCE (2014). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-13), American Society of Civil Engineering, Reston, Virginia.
  10. Gilani A.S.J., Takhirov S.M., & Tedesco L.M. (2014). Proposed New Approach for the Seismic Evaluation Testing of Suspended Ceiling Systems, Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering.
  11. Gilani A.S.J., Reinhorn A.M., Glasgow B., Lavan O., & Miyamoto H.K. (2010). Earthquake simulator testing and seismic evaluation of suspended ceilings, J. Archit. Eng., 16, 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2010)16:2(63)
  12. Soroushian S., Maragakis M., & Jenkins C. (2016). Capacity evaluation of suspended ceiling-perimeter attachments, J. Struct. Eng., 142(2), 1-14.
  13. Brandolese S., Fiorin L., & Scotta R. (2019). Seismic demand and capacity assessment of suspended ceiling systems, Eng. Struct, 193, 219-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.034