DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

철도차량부품 제조 중소기업의 기술사업 활성화를 위한 요인 분석

A Study on Activation Technology Commercialization of Railway Vehicle Parts Manufacturing SME

  • 김명종 (서울과학기술대학교 철도전문대학원 철도차량시스템공학과) ;
  • 이경철 (한국철도기술연구원) ;
  • 구정서 (서울과학기술대학교 철도전문대학원 철도안전공학과)
  • 투고 : 2019.08.06
  • 심사 : 2019.09.17
  • 발행 : 2019.10.01

초록

국내 철도차량 부품관련 제조 산업은 대부분 중소기업 중심의 산업으로서 대다수의 소규모 영세한 기업이 규모의 경제를 구축하지 못하여 수익성의 한계를 보이고 있는 상황이다. 또한, 제조 중소기업 내 자체적인 기술력을 보유하기 보다는 해외 선진국의 기술 제품들을 수입하여 국내 철도 운영기관에 납품하는 형태로 생존하고 있다. 그러므로 현 철도차량 제조산업의 문제점을 파악하고 개선할 수 있는 연구와 동시에 정부의 철도산업 발전 정책이 제대로 반영이 되고 있는지에 대해 파악하는 연구가 필요하다고 판단된다. 본 연구는 기술사업화의 관련된 선행연구 및 문헌연구를 통해 활성화 요인(Level 1, Level 2)을 도출하였고, 철도산업의 제조 중소기업 종사자 전문가, 학계/연구소의 전문가, 철도 운영기관의 차량 전문가들을 대상으로 AHP 설문조사를 시행하였다. 그 이후 Level 1에서 중요도와 우선순위가 가장 높은 Level 2의 중요요인에 대해 Level 3 활성화 방안 AHP 분석을 추가적으로 실시하였다. AHP 분석결과, 기술적 요인에서 '기술 연계성'이 가장 중요한 방안으로 나타났으며, 기업내부 요인에는 중소기업 사업전문가와 학계 연구기관 전문가는 '사업화 능력'중요도가 높게 평가하였고, 운영기관 전문가는 '기술개발 능력' 중요도를 높게 평가하였다. 외부지원 요인에는 중소기업 사업 전문가는 '인력양성 지원'방안이 중요하다고 분석되었고, 다른 두 집단 전문가는 '연구개발 지원'이 중요하다고 분석되었다. 본 연구결과는 향후 진행될 국가 R&D 지원에 앞서 철도 제조 중소기업들의 역량에 따라 정부지원의 정책적 우선순위의 방향성을 제시하고자 한다.

The domestic railway parts and equipment manufacturing industry is mainly focused on SMEs, and the majority of them are suffering from profitability because they cannot build economies of scale. Besides, they have survived in the form of importing technology products from overseas advanced countries and delivering them to domestic railway operators rather than having in-house technology. Therefore it is necessary to study whether the problems of the current railway industry can be identified and improved and at the same time, whether the government's railway industry development policy is properly reflected. literature studies related to technology commercialization, and conduct surveys of AHP questionnaires on the experts of the manufacturing industry of SMEs, academics / research institutes of the railway industry. After that, the Level 3 activation method AHP analysis was additionally performed on the important factors of Level 2 that have the highest importance and priority in Level 1. As a result of the AHP analysis, 'Technical Connectivity' was the most important method in the technical factor, and SME experts and academic and research institute experts were highly evaluated for 'commercialization ability' Competence in terms of importance. As for external support factors, it was analyzed that SME experts "support for manpower development" was important, while the other two group experts research and development support was important. In this study, the priority of the government support and policy priorities are suggested according to the capabilities of the railway manufacturing SMEs before the future R&D support.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, D. B. (2017). "Analysis of the effective strategies on railway industry development based on company competences." Journal of The Korean Society for Urban Railway, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1093-1100 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.24284/JKOSUR.2017.12.5.4.1093
  2. Choi, S. B. and Ha, G. R. (2011). "A study of critical factors for technological innovation of korean manufacturing firms." Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 1-24 (in Korean).
  3. Kim C. H. (2012). "Case studies on the failure of commercialization of technology." Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 203-223 (in Korean).
  4. Kim, H. M., Han, J. H. and Kim, Y. B. (2013). "Study on future foresight of the technology commercialization policy." Korea Industrial Economic Association, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 803-824 (in Korean).
  5. Kim, Y. W. (2011). Study on activation of technology commercialization in high-tech SMEs, Master's thesis, Sung Kyun Kwan University (in Korean).
  6. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancment (KAIA) (2018). Analysis of the effective strategies on railway industry development based on company competences. Infrastructure R&D Report (in Korean).
  7. Korea Statistical Information Service (KOSIS) (2016). Using data from 2016 Census on Establishments (in Korean).
  8. Lee, J. M. and Jeong. S. Y. (2011). "An empirical study on the determinants of technoloy commercialization in Korean SMEs." Conference on Technology Innovation Society Fall 2001, Cheonan, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society (in Korean).
  9. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) (2016). A planning business about core components / devices of next generation railroad technology and an establishing strategy for promoting enterprises. Infrastructure R&D Report (in Korean).
  10. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) (2018). A planning business about core components / devices of next generation railroad technology and an establishing strategy for promoting enterprises. Infrastructure R&D Report (in Korean).
  11. Ministry of SMEs and Startups (MSS) (2017). Technology roadmap for SME 2017-2019. Infrastructure R&D Report.
  12. Park, J. B. (2011). Plan for revitalizing commercialization of private sector technology. Infrastructure R&D Report, KIET (in Korean).
  13. Roh, D. H., Jeong, Y. K. and Park, H. Y. (2016). "An analysis on the relative importance evaluation of SMEs.Venture technology commercialization problems using AHP." Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-22 (in Korean).
  14. Statistics Korea (KOSTAT) (2016). Korean statistical information service number of workers. Report.
  15. Thomas Saaty, T. L. (1977). The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  16. Yang, D. W. (2005). "An empirical study on extracting significant technology valuation index of IT SMES." Korea Industrial Economic Association, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 277-295 (in Korean).
  17. Yang, T. Y. (2006). Improvement of the performance indicator of Daedeok R & D special zone and research on applied measurement method. Infrastructure R&D Report, KIET (in Korean).