참고문헌
- Walton TR. The up to 25-year survival and clinical performance of 2,340 high gold-based metal-ceramic single crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:151-60. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3136
- An S, Kim S, Choi H, Lee JH, Moon HS. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1171-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.024
- Vennerstrom M, Fakhary M, Von Steyern PV. The fit of crowns produced using digital impression systems. Swed Dent J 2014;38:101-10.
- Seker E, Ozcelik TB, Rathi N, Yilmaz B. Evaluation of marginal fit of CAD/CAM restorations fabricated through cone beam computerized tomography and laboratory scanner data. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:47-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.006
- Borba M, Cesar PF, Griggs JA, Della Bona A. Adaptation of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Dent Mater 2011;27:1119-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.004
- Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa J. Dental Impression Materials and Techniques. Dent Clin North Am 2017;61:779-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2017.06.004
- Euan R, Figueras-Alvarez O, Cabratosa-Termes J, Oliver-Parra R. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:155-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.012
- Dahl BE, Dahl JE, Ronold HJ. Digital evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single-crown fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci 2018;126:512-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12576
- Praca L, Pekamc FC, Regod RO, Radermacherc K, Wolfarta S, Marottia J. Accuracy of single crowns fabricated from ultrasound digital impressions. Dent Mater 2018;34:e280-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.301
- Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry IL, Thomas GW, Qian F. Internal fit of pressed and computeraided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:304-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.015
- Ahlholm P, Sipila K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U. Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: A review. J Prosthodont 2018;27:35-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12527
- Gabor AG, Zaharia C, Stan AT, Gavrilovici AM, Negrutiu ML, Sinescu C. Digital Dentistry-Digital Impression and CAD/CAM system applications. J Interdisciplinary Med 2017;2:54-7. https://doi.org/10.1515/jim-2017-0033
- Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:555-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.002
- Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry I, Thomas GW, Qian F. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. J Prosthodont 2014;23:610-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12180
- Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:554-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.001
- Schaefer O, Decker M, Wittstock F, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro. J Dent 2014;42:677-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.016
- Vandeweghe S, Vervack V, Dierens M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:648-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12853
- Su TS, Sun J. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:362-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.018
- Renne W, Wolf B, Kessler R, McPherson K, Mennito AS. Evaluation of the marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated using two different chairside CAD/CAM systems on preparations of varying quality. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015;27:194-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12148
- Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression-a split-mouth randomised clinical study. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:4043-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02840-0
- Takeuchi Y, Koizumi H, Furuchi M, Sato Y, Ohkubo C, Matsumura H. Use of digital impression systems with intraoral scanners for fabricating restorations and fixed dental prostheses. J Oral Sci 2018;60:1-7. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.17-0444
- Nesse H, Ulstein DM, Vaage MM, Oilo M. Internal and marginal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses fabricated with 3 different techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:686-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.05.007
- Dikbas I, Tanalp J, Tomruk CO, Koksal T. Evaluation of reasons for extraction of crowned teeth: a prospective study at a university clinic. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71:848-56. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.680908
- McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
- Ucar Y, Akova T, Akyil MS, Brantley WA. Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique: laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:253-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60165-7
- Sakrana AA. In vitro evaluation of the marginal and internal discrepancies of different esthetic restorations. J Appl Oral Sci 2013;21:575-80. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-775720130064
- Ortega R, Gonzalo E, Gomez-Polo M, Suarez MJ. Marginal and internal discrepancies of posterior zirconia-based crowns fabricated with three different CAD/CAM systems versus metal-ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:509-11. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4359
- Zoellner A, Bragger U, Fellmann V, Gaengler P. Correlation between clinical scoring of secondary caries at crown margins and histologically assessed extent of the lesions. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:453-9.
- Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Guth JF. Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization-a laboratory study. Dent Mater 2014;30:400-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.006
- Kocaagaoglu H, Kilinc HI, Albayrak H, Kara M. In vitro evaluation of marginal, axial, and occlusal discrepancies in metal ceramic restorations produced with new technologies. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:368-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.013
- Afify A, Haney S, Verrett R, Mansueto M, Cray J, Johnson R. Marginal discrepancy of noble metal-ceramic fixed dental prosthesis frameworks fabricated by conventional and digital technologies. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:307.e1-307.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.012
- Svanborg P, Skjerven H, Carlsson P, Eliasson A, Karlsson S, Ortorp A. Marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses generated from digital and conventional impressions. Int J Dent 2014;2014:534382. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/534382
- Eroglu Z, Gurbulak AG. Fatigue behavior of zirconia-ceramic, galvano-ceramic, and porcelain-fused-to-metal fixed partial dentures. J Prosthodont 2013;22:516-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12059
- EOS. Material Data Sheet EOS CobaltChrome SP2 material for EOSINT M 270. No., 2009. (https://www.eos.info/material-m).
- Memarian M, Sadighpour L, Nosratpour R, Fard MJK. Marginal adaptation and internal fit of posterior 3-unit zirconia FPDs fabricated with different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2017;25:79-85.
- Dureja I, Yadav B, Malhotra P, Dabas N, Bhargava A, Pahwa R. A comparative evaluation of vertical marginal fit of provisional crowns fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technique and direct (intraoral technique) and flexural strength of the materials: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2018;18:314-20. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_306_17
- Ortorp A1, Jonsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult von Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2011;27:356-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.015
- Boitelle P, Mawussi B, Tapie L, Fromentin O. A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Oral Rehabil 2014;41:853-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12205
- Colpani JT, Borba M, Della Bona A. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater 2013; 29:174-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.012
- Kenyon BJ, Hagge MS, Leknius C, Daniels WC, Weed ST. Dimensional accuracy of 7 die materials. J Prosthodont 2005;14:25-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00007.x
- Corso M, Abanomy A, Di Canzio J, Zurakowski D, Morgano SM. The effect of temperature changes on the dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:626-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70068-X
- Xu D, Xiang N, Wei B. The marginal fit of selective laser melting-fabricated metal crowns: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:1437-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.018
- Wankhade S, Sanghavi K, Rajguru V, Lokade J. A comparative evaluation of six commonly used types of die materials for the property of abrasion resistance, at two time intervals: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2013;3:1-6. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1067
피인용 문헌
- Comparison of digital and silicone impressions for single-tooth implants and two- and three-unit implants for a free-end edentulous saddle vol.21, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01836-1