DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Proposal for a gingival shade guide based on in vivo spectrophotometric measurements

  • Polo, Cristina Gomez (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, University of Salamanca) ;
  • Montero, Javier (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, University of Salamanca) ;
  • Casado, Ana Maria Martin (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, University of Salamanca)
  • Received : 2019.01.04
  • Accepted : 2019.09.16
  • Published : 2019.10.31

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to propose and assess a shade guide for pink gingival aesthetics using a Spanish population sample. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The $L^*$, $C^*$, h, $a^*$ and $b^*$ coordinates of 259 participants were measured using a spectrophotometer in 3 standardized points along the attached gingiva of the maxillary central incisors. A hierarchical clustering analysis was applied to obtain separate solutions regarding the number of shade tabs. For each of the solutions obtained, color differences (${\Delta}E^*$) were calculated using the CIELab and CIEDE2000 formulas, and the proposed shade guide was selected considering (1) the color differences between tabs and (2) the coverage error of each of the solutions. RESULTS. The proposed shade guide consisted of 8 gingival shade tabs and achieved CIELab and CIEDE2000 coverage errors of less than the respective 50:50% acceptability thresholds (${\Delta}E^*=4.6$ units and ${\Delta}E_{00}=4.1$). The coordinates for the various gingival shade tabs were as follows: Tab 1: $L^*43.3$, $a^*21.9$, $b^*12.3$ (1.6); Tab 2: $L^*42.9$, $a^*34.1$, $b^*19.1$; Tab 3: $L^*46.5$, $a^*25.8$, $b^*10.9$; Tab 4: $L^*46.5$, $a^*27.3$, $b^*15.1$; Tab 5: $L^*49.6$, $a^*23.5$, $b^*16.8$; Tab 6: $L^*51.5$, $a^*19.7$, $b^*13.6$; Tab 7: $L^*55.9$, $a^*22.0$, $b^*15.0$; and Tab 8: $L^*56.0$, $a^*19.9$, $b^*18.8$. CONCLUSION. The CIELab and CIEDE2000 coverage errors for the 8 shade tabs of the proposed gingival shade guide were significantly lower than those of other guides. Therefore, despite the limitations of this study, the proposed guide is more appropriate for matching gingival shade in the Spanish general population.

Keywords

References

  1. Miller PD Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985;5:8-13.
  2. Miller PD Jr. Root coverage grafting for regeneration and aesthetics. Periodontol 2000 1993;1:118-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1993.tb00213.x
  3. Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Perez MM, Ionescu AM, Paravina RD. Gingival shade guides: Colorimetric and spectral modeling. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30:E31-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12376
  4. Gomez-Polo C, Montero J, Gomez-Polo M, Martin Casado AM. Clinical study on natural gingival color. Odontology 2019;107:80-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0365-2
  5. Sala L, Carrillo-de-Albornoz A, Martin C, Bascones-Martinez A. Factors involved in the spectrophotometric measurement of soft tissue: A clinical study of interrater and intrarater reliability. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:558-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.003
  6. Gomez-Polo C, Gomez-Polo M, Martinez Vazquez de Parga JA, Celemin-Vinuela A. Clinical study of the 3D-master color system among the Spanish population. J Prosthodont 2018;27:708-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12584
  7. Yuan JC, Brewer JD, Monaco EA Jr, Davis EL. Defining a natural tooth color space based on a 3-dimensional shade system. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:110-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60044-4
  8. Ahn JS, Lee YK. Color distribution of a shade guide in the value, chroma, and hue scale. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:18-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60129-8
  9. Khurana PR, Thomas PV, Rao SV, Balamuragan R, Singh MP. A clinical study to correlate maxillary anterior natural teeth with that of the commercially available acrylic and porcelain shade guides. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14:427-33. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1339
  10. Gomez-Polo C, Montero J, Gomez-Polo M, de Parga JA, Celemin-Vinuela A. Natural Tooth color estimation based on age and gender. J Prosthodont 2017;26:107-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12345
  11. Gozalo-Diaz D, Johnston WM, Wee AG. Estimating the color of maxillary central incisors based on age and gender. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:93-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60155-9
  12. Eiffler C, Cevirgen E, Helling S, Zornek J, Pritsch M, Hassel AJ. Differences in lightness, chroma, and hue in the anterior teeth of quinquagenarians and septuagenarians. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:587-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0331-z
  13. Bayindir F, Bayindir YZ, Gozalo-Diaz DJ, Wee AG. Coverage error of gingival shade guide systems in measuring color of attached anterior gingiva. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:46-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60290-5
  14. Huang JW, Chen WC, Huang TK, Fu PS, Lai PL, Tsai CF, Hung CC. Using a spectrophotometric study of human gingival colour distribution to develop a shade guide. J Dent 2011;39:e11-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.10.001
  15. Ito M, Marx DB, Cheng AC, Wee AG. Proposed shade guide for attached gingiva-a pilot study. J Prosthodont 2015;24:182-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12195
  16. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry: Part I. The three-dimensional nature of color. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:416-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(73)80019-8
  17. CIE (Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage). 1976. Annuaire, Roster, Register, Annexe au Bulletin CIE (Paris: Bureau Central de la CIE). (PROCLUS, patrimonio Conicet).
  18. Gomez-Polo C, Montero J, Gomez-Polo M, Martin Casado A. Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE 2000 color difference formulas on gingival color space. J Prosthodont 2017 Dec 22. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12717. [Epub ahead of print]
  19. Amer RS, Chandrasekaran I, Johnston WM. Illuminant effect on the coverage error of a gingiva-colored composite resin shade guide. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:770-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.016
  20. Perez MM, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Carrillo F, Ionescu AM, Paravina RD. Color difference thresholds for computer-simulated human Gingiva. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30:E24-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12373
  21. Lee YK. Comparison of CIELAB DeltaE(*) and CIEDE2000 color-differences after polymerization and thermocycling of resin composites. Dent Mater 2005;21:678-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.09.005
  22. Ren J, Lin H, Huang Q, Zheng G. Determining color difference thresholds in denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:702-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.009
  23. Luo MR, Cui G, Rigg B. The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Res Appl 2001;26:340-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.1049
  24. CIE Publication 142-2001. ISO/CIE 11664-6: 2014 (CIE S 014-6/E:2013).
  25. CIE 15. Technical Report: Colorimetry, 3rd ed. 2004.
  26. Sharma G, Wu W, Dalal EN. The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: Implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations. Color Res Appl 2005;30:21-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.20070
  27. Pecho OE, Perez MM, Ghinea R, Della Bona A. Lightness, chroma and hue differences on visual shade matching. Dent Mater 2016;32:1362-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.218
  28. Sharma G. The CIEDE2000 Color-difference formula: Implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations. Excel spreadsheet implementation of the CIEDE2000 color-difference formula (including test data). Available at: http://www2.ece.rochester.edu/-gsharma/ciede2000/.
  29. Ishikawa N. Study on measuring method of gingival color. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 1961;8:115.
  30. Baumgartner WJ, Weis RP, Reyher JL. The diagnostic value of redness in gingivitis. J Periodontol 1966;37:294-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1966.37.4.294
  31. Dummett CO, Sakumura JS, Barens G. The relationship of facial skin complexion to oral mucosa pigmentation and tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:392-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90207-3
  32. Kleinheinz J, Buchter A, Fillies T, Joos U. Vascular basis of mucosal color. Head Face Med 2005;1:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-1-4
  33. Heydecke G, Schnitzer S, Turp JC. The color of human gingiva and mucosa: visual measurement and description of distribution. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9:257-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0006-3
  34. Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963;21:533-51. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356309011240
  35. Lang NP, Tonetti MS. Periodontal risk assessment (PRA) for patients in supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). Oral Health Prev Dent 2003;1:7-16.
  36. Jung RE, Sailer I, Hammerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007;27:251-7.
  37. Bressan E, Paniz G, Lops D, Corazza B, Romeo E, Favero G. Influence of abutment material on the gingival color of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:631-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02008.x
  38. Happe A, Schulte-Mattler V, Strassert C, Naumann M, Stimmelmayr M, Zoller JE, Rothamel D. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by dyed fluorescent zirconia and nondyed, nonfluorescent zirconia in thin mucosa. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33:e1-8. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1303
  39. Sailer I, Fehmer V, Ioannidis A, Hammerle CH, Thoma DS. Threshold value for the perception of color changes of human gingiva. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014;34:757-62. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2174
  40. Brewer JD, Wee A, Seghi R. Advances in color matching. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:341-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2004.01.004
  41. Hugo B, Witzel T, Klaiber B. Comparison of in vivo visual and computer-aided tooth shade determination. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9:244-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0014-3
  42. Gozalo-Diaz DJ, Lindsey DT, Johnston WM, Wee AG. Measurement of color for craniofacial structures using a 45/0-degree optical configuration. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.10.013
  43. Everitt BS, Landau S, Leese M, Stahl D. Cluster Analysis. 5th ed. Wiley, 2011.
  44. Analoui M, Papkosta E, Cochran M, Matis B. Designing visually optimal shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:371-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.028
  45. Ward JH Jr. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J American Statistical Assoc 1963;58:236-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
  46. Thoma DS, Ioannidis A, Fehmer V, Michelotti G, Jung RE, Sailer I. Threshold values for the perception of color changes in human teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2016;36:777-83. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2937
  47. Sarmast ND, Angelov N, Ghinea R, Powers JM, Paravina RD. Color compatibility of gingival shade guides and gingiva-colored dental materials with healthy human gingiva. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2018;38:397-403. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.3430
  48. Trushkowsky RD. How a spectrophotometer can help you achieve esthetic shade matching. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003;24:60-6.
  49. Joiner A. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dent 2004; 32:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.10.013
  50. Ho DK, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Angelov N, Paravina RD. Color range and color distribution of healthy human gingiva: a prospective clinical study. Sci Rep 2015;5:18498. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18498
  51. Barghi N, Pedrero JA, Bosch RR. Effects of batch variation on shade of dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:625-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90235-5

Cited by

  1. Analysis of the Distribution of Urine Color and Its Relationship With Urine Dry Chemical Parameters Among College Students in Beijing, China - A Cross-Sectional Study vol.8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.719260