Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative preclinical assessment of the use of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane to repair perforated sinus membranes

  • Chang, Yun-Young (Department of Dentistry, Inha International Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Su-Hwan (Department of Periodontics, Asan Medical Center & Department of Dentistry, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Goh, Mi-Seon (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Yun, Jeong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2019.09.01
  • Accepted : 2019.09.15
  • Published : 2019.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM) to repair perforated sinus membranes in rabbits. Methods: Bilateral surgical windows (7.5-mm diameter) were prepared on the nasal bones of 14 rabbits. Standardized circular perforations (5-mm diameter) were made in the sinus membrane by manipulating implant twist drills. The perforated sinus membranes were repaired using dHACM or a resorbable collagen membrane (CM). The negative control (NC) group did not undergo perforated sinus membrane repair, while the positive control (PC) group underwent sinus augmentation without perforations. The same amount of deproteinized porcine bone mineral was grafted in all 4 groups. After 6 weeks, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and histomorphometric evaluations were conducted. Results: The micro-CT analysis revealed that the total augmented volume was not significantly different among the groups. In the dHACM group, newly formed bone filled the augmented area with remaining biomaterials; however, non-ciliated flat epithelium and inflammatory cells were observed on the healed sinus membrane. Histometric analysis showed that the percentage of newly formed bone area in the dHACM group did not differ significantly from that in the CM group. The dHACM group showed a significantly higher percentage of newly formed bone area than the NC group, but there was no significant difference between the dHACM and PC groups. Conclusions: dHACM could be a feasible solution for repairing sinus membrane perforations that occur during sinus floor augmentation.

Keywords

References

  1. Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol 2004;75:511-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.4.511
  2. Hernandez-Alfaro F, Torradeflot MM, Marti C. Prevalence and management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus-lift procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:91-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01372.x
  3. Stacchi C, Andolsek F, Berton F, Perinetti G, Navarra CO, Di Lenarda R. Intraoperative complications during sinus floor elevation with lateral approach: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017;32:e107-18. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4884
  4. de Almeida Ferreira CE, Martinelli CB, Novaes AB Jr, Pignaton TB, Guignone CC, Goncalves de Almeida AL, et al. Effect of maxillary sinus membrane perforation on implant survival rate: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017;32:401-7. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4419
  5. Nolan PJ, Freeman K, Kraut RA. Correlation between Schneiderian membrane perforation and sinus lift graft outcome: a retrospective evaluation of 359 augmented sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72:47-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.020
  6. Proussaefs P, Lozada J, Kim J, Rohrer MD. Repair of the perforated sinus membrane with a resorbable collagen membrane: a human study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:413-20.
  7. Testori T, Wallace SS, Del Fabbro M, Taschieri S, Trisi P, Capelli M, et al. Repair of large sinus membrane perforations using stabilized collagen barrier membranes: surgical techniques with histologic and radiographic evidence of success. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:9-17.
  8. Becker ST, Terheyden H, Steinriede A, Behrens E, Springer I, Wiltfang J. Prospective observation of 41 perforations of the Schneiderian membrane during sinus floor elevation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1285-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01612.x
  9. Niknejad H, Peirovi H, Jorjani M, Ahmadiani A, Ghanavi J, Seifalian AM. Properties of the amniotic membrane for potential use in tissue engineering. Eur Cell Mater 2008;15:88-99.
  10. Koob TJ, Lim JJ, Massee M, Zabek N, Denoziere G. Properties of dehydrated human amnion/chorion composite grafts: Implications for wound repair and soft tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2014;102:1353-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33141
  11. Kesting MR, Wolff KD, Nobis CP, Rohleder NH. Amniotic membrane in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;18:153-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-012-0382-1
  12. Koob TJ, Lim JJ, Massee M, Zabek N, Rennert R, Gurtner G, et al. Angiogenic properties of dehydrated human amnion/chorion allografts: therapeutic potential for soft tissue repair and regeneration. Vasc Cell 2014;6:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-824X-6-10
  13. Hashim SN, Yusof MF, Zahari W, Noordin KB, Kannan TP, Hamid SS, et al. Angiogenic potential of extracellular matrix of human amniotic membrane. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2016;13:211-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-016-9057-6
  14. Arai N, Tsuno H, Okabe M, Yoshida T, Koike C, Noguchi M, et al. Clinical application of a hyperdry amniotic membrane on surgical defects of the oral mucosa. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:2221-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.033
  15. Rosen PS, Froum SJ, Cohen DW. Consecutive case series using a composite allograft containing mesenchymal cells with an amnion-chorion barrier to treat mandibular Class III/IV furcations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2015;35:453-60. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2314
  16. Velez I, Parker WB, Siegel MA, Hernandez M. Cryopreserved amniotic membrane for modulation of periodontal soft tissue healing: a pilot study. J Periodontol 2010;81:1797-804. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100060
  17. Kothari CR, Goudar G, Hallur N, Sikkerimath B, Gudi S, Kothari MC. Use of amnion as a graft material in vestibuloplasty: a clinical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;50:545-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.09.022
  18. Shah R, Sowmya NK, Mehta DS. Amnion membrane for coverage of gingival recession: a novel application. Contemp Clin Dent 2014;5:293-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.137900
  19. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2010;1:94-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.72351
  20. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:175-91. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  21. Yon J, Lee JS, Lim HC, Kim MS, Hong JY, Choi SH, et al. Pre-clinical evaluation of the osteogenic potential of bone morphogenetic protein-2 loaded onto a particulate porcine bone biomaterial. J Clin Periodontol 2015;42:81-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12329
  22. Kang H. Random allocation and dynamic allocation randomization. Anesth Pain Med 2017;12:201-12. https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.2017.12.3.201
  23. Moon YS, Sohn DS, Moon JW, Lee JH, Park IS, Lee JK. Comparative histomorphometric analysis of maxillary sinus augmentation with absorbable collagen membrane and osteoinductive replaceable bony window in rabbits. Implant Dent 2014;23:29-36. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000031
  24. Choi Y, Yun JH, Kim CS, Choi SH, Chai JK, Jung UW. Sinus augmentation using absorbable collagen sponge loaded with Escherichia coli-expressed recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 in a standardized rabbit sinus model: a radiographic and histologic analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:682-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02222.x
  25. Lim HC, Hong JY, Lee JS, Jung UW, Choi SH. Late-term healing in an augmented sinus with different ratios of biphasic calcium phosphate: a pilot study using a rabbit sinus model. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2016;46:57-69. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.1.57
  26. Holtzclaw D. Maxillary sinus membrane repair with amnion-chorion barriers: a retrospective case series. J Periodontol 2015;86:936-40. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.140087c
  27. Lee JS, Shin HK, Yun JH, Cho KS. Randomized clinical trial of maxillary sinus grafting using deproteinized porcine and bovine bone mineral. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017;19:140-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12430
  28. Forsgren K, Stierna P, Kumlien J, Carlsoo B. Regeneration of maxillary sinus mucosa following surgical removal. Experimental study in rabbits. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102:459-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949310200610
  29. Watanabe K, Niimi A, Ueda M. Autogenous bone grafts in the rabbit maxillary sinus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70189-7
  30. Al-Moraissi E, Elsharkawy A, Abotaleb B, Alkebsi K, Al-Motwakel H. Does intraoperative perforation of Schneiderian membrane during sinus lift surgery causes an increased the risk of implants failure?: a systematic review and meta regression analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018;20:882-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12660
  31. Lim HC, Son Y, Hong JY, Shin SI, Jung UW, Chung JH. Sinus floor elevation in sites with a perforated schneiderian membrane: What is the effect of placing a collagen membrane in a rabbit model? Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:1202-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13385
  32. Favero V, Lang NP, Canullo L, Urbizo Velez J, Bengazi F, Botticelli D. Sinus floor elevation outcomes following perforation of the Schneiderian membrane. An experimental study in sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:233-40.
  33. Benninger MS, Schmidt JL, Crissman JD, Gottlieb C. Mucociliary function following sinus mucosal regeneration. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;105:641-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459989110500502
  34. Min YG, Kim IT, Park SH. Mucociliary activity and ultrastructural abnormalities of regenerated sinus mucosa in rabbits. Laryngoscope 1994;104:1482-6.
  35. Erickson VR, Antunes M, Chen B, Cohen NA, Hwang PH. The effects of retinoic acid on ciliary function of regenerated sinus mucosa. Am J Rhinol 2008;22:334-6. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3176
  36. Kim YM, Lee CH, Won TB, Kim SW, Kim JW, Rhee CS, et al. Functional recovery of rabbit maxillary sinus mucosa in two different experimental injury models. Laryngoscope 2008;118:541-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e31815bf2f3
  37. Froum SJ, Khouly I, Favero G, Cho SC. Effect of maxillary sinus membrane perforation on vital bone formation and implant survival: a retrospective study. J Periodontol 2013;84:1094-9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.120458

Cited by

  1. Long‐term effects of sinus membrane perforation on dental implants placed with transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A case-control study vol.23, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13038