DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Index for Gentrification occurred in Urban Regeneration Projects

도시재생사업에서 젠트리피케이션 발생 요인 분석

  • Lee, Jeong-Dong (Department of Urban Regeneration Assistance Organization, Korea Land & Housing)
  • 이정동 (한국토지주택공사 도시재생지원기구)
  • Received : 2019.07.11
  • Accepted : 2019.10.04
  • Published : 2019.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to review the Gentrification and Development Index in terms of domestic and foreign gentrification. Based on the important indicators of the Gentrification index through previous research, the four evaluation areas were divided into structure and subject, production and consumption, supply and demand, and capital and culture. Looking at the importance of each area, the production and consumption aspects were highest as the important index of the occurrence of gentrification, followed in order by the supply and demand, the structure and subject, and the capital and culture order. From the detailed factors, the report revealed the changes in sales to structure and subject matter, increases in franchises to production and consumption, rises in rent to supply and demand, and transient population to capital and culture to be important items. In addition, an analysis of the gentrification occurrence indicators in urban regeneration project areas revealed high weight in terms of production and consumption, supply, and demand, including the increased franchises, one-person start-ups, higher rents and higher real estate values. In other words, the occurrence of gentrification in urban regeneration areas produces the largest portion of the increases in franchises and rent. Therefore, step-by-step measures are needed through monitoring.

본 연구는 국내에서 발생한 젠트리피케이션 현상을 검토하고 국내외 연구 자료를 통해 젠트리피케이션 발생지표를 도출하여 정량화 된 수치로 진단할 수 있는 지표를 개발하는데 목적이 있다. 선행연구를 통해 도출된 젠트리피케이션 발생 지표를 바탕으로 구조와 주체, 생산과 소비, 공급과 수요, 자본과 문화로 4개 평가영역을 구분하였다. 영역별 중요도를 살펴보면, 젠트리피케이션 발생 중요지표로 생산과 소비측면이 가장 높게 나타났으며, 공급과 수요, 구조와 주체, 자본과 문화 순으로 나타났다. 세부요인별로는 구조와 주체에서 매출액변화, 생산과 소비에서 프랜차이즈 증가, 공급과 수요에서 임대료 상승, 자본과 문화에서 통행량의 증가를 가장 높게 나타났다. 또한 도시재생사업지역 내 젠트리피케이션 발생 지표를 중요도로 분석한 결과 프랜차이즈 증가, 1인 창업, 임대료 상승, 부동산 가치 상승 등 생산과 소비, 공급과 수요 측면에서 높은 가중치를 보이고 있다. 즉 도시재생 사업지역 내 젠트리피케이션 발생은 기존 사례지역에서 알 수 있듯이 프랜차이즈 증가와 임대료 상승에 대한 부분이 가장 크게 나타났으며, 모니터링을 통해 단계별 대책이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Atkinson, R, "Measuring Gentrification and Displacement in Greater london", Urban studies, vol. 37, No. 1, January 2000.pp.149-165. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0042098002339
  2. Ryu, Tae-chang, "The Necessity of Urban Regeneration in the Market", 2018
  3. Newman, P. and Kenworthy, J. Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Island Press, Washington. 1999.
  4. Ley, D., "Artist, Aestheticization and the Field of Gentrification," Urban Studies, 40(12): 2527-2544, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000136192
  5. Ley, D, "Gentrification and the politics of the New Middle Class", Environment and Planning D:Society and Space, 1994. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/d120053
  6. Zukin, S., "Urban lifestyles: diversity and standardization in spaces of consumption," Urban studies. (1987, 1998) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0042098984574
  7. Freeman, L. and Braconi, F, "Displacement or Succession? Residential Mobility in Gentrifying Neighborhoods", Urban Affairs Review, 40(4), 2004. pp.463-491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087404273341
  8. Freeman, L. and Braconi, F, "Gentrification and Displacement", The Urban Prospect, 8(1), 2002. pp.1-4.
  9. Millard-Ball, A, "Gentrification in a Residential Mobility Framework : Social Change, Tenure Change and Chains of Moves in Stockholm", Housing Studies, Vol. 17, NO. 6, 2002. pp.833-856 https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030215997
  10. Rose, D, "Rethinking Gentrification : Beyond the Uneven Development of Marxist Urban Theory", Environment and Planning D, 2, 1999. pp.47-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/d020047
  11. Song, ji-eun &, "A Study on the Countermeasures of Commercial Gentrification in Urban Area", Korea Research Institute, 2016
  12. Kim, hyung-gyun, "Status and Countermeasures of Gentrification in Busan", Busan Development Forum(159), 2016, pp6-15
  13. Park, jeong-ho, "Development and Meaning of Gentrification Early Warning System in the United States", auric, No. 26, 2017
  14. Kim, jung-hoon, "A Study on the Important Factors for the Regional Synergistic and Prevention of the Gentrification", Residential Environment, NO.15, 2017 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22313/reik.2017.15.2.209
  15. Smith, N, "Toward a theory of Gentrification : a back to the city movement by capital, not people", Journal of the American Planning Association, 45, October 1979. pp.538-548 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944367908977002
  16. Wyly, E. K. and D. j. Hammel, "Islands of Decay in Seas of Renewal : Housing Policy and the Resurgence of Gentrification", Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1999. pp.711-771. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511482.1999.9521348
  17. Newman, K. and Wyly, E. K, " The Right to Stay Put, Revisited : Gentrification and Resistance to Displacement in New York City", Urban Studies, Vol. 43, No. 1, January 2006. pp.23-57 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980500388710
  18. Lee, ji-hyun, "The Empirical Study on the Gentrification of Seoul", University of Seoul, Master Thesis, 2011
  19. Kim, Bong-Won, kwon, Ni-A, and Gil, Ji-hye, Analysis of the Commercial Characteristics about the Samcheongdong-gil Gentrification. The Korea Regional Economic Association, No. 15, pp. 83-102.
  20. Kin, kirl, "Housing Redevelopment and Neighborhood Change As a Gentrification Process in Seoul, Korea: A Case Study of Wolgok-4 Dong Redevelopment District", Florida State University, 2006, pp215-216.
  21. Oh, Dong Hoon, "Searching for Direction of Practicable Urban Revitalization Policy by Gentrification Case Study", Korea Real Estate Analysts Association(Kreaa), 2005, pp51-67
  22. Jung, hyun joo, "Theories and Issues of Gentrification: Contextual Analysis through Comparative Studies", Seoul National University Geography Education, 2005, pp321-335(15)