한국환경보건학회지 (Journal of Environmental Health Sciences)

  • 제45권5호
  • /
  • Pages.426-433
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1738-4087(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-8616(eISSN)
한국환경보건학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Health)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

경기북부 주요 하천 내 동물플랑크톤 군집특성 조사 연구

Investigation of Zooplankton Communities in Streams in Northern Gyeonggi-do Province

  • 고순미 (경기도 보건환경연구원 북부지원) ;
  • 임흥빈 (경기도 보건환경연구원 북부지원) ;
  • 정은희 (경기도 보건환경연구원 북부지원) ;
  • 김태열 (경기도 보건환경연구원 북부지원) ;
  • 김재광 (경기도 보건환경연구원 북부지원) ;
  • 최정인 (경기도 보건환경연구원 북부지원) ;
  • 이호정 (경기도 보건환경연구원 북부지원) ;
  • 오조교 (경기도 보건환경연구원 북부지원)
  • Go, Soon-Mi (Gyeonggi-do Institute of Health & Environment) ;
  • Im, Heung-Bin (Gyeonggi-do Institute of Health & Environment) ;
  • Jung, Eun-Hee (Gyeonggi-do Institute of Health & Environment) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Yuel (Gyeonggi-do Institute of Health & Environment) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Kwang (Gyeonggi-do Institute of Health & Environment) ;
  • Choi, Jeong-In (Gyeonggi-do Institute of Health & Environment) ;
  • Lee, Ho-Jung (Gyeonggi-do Institute of Health & Environment) ;
  • Oh, Jo-Gyo (Gyeonggi-do Institute of Health & Environment)
  • 투고 : 2019.06.19
  • 심사 : 2019.07.16
  • 발행 : 2019.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: Zooplankton communities play important roles in aquatic ecosystems as secondary producers that graze on phytoplankton and in turn are preyed upon by planktivorous and juvenile fish. They can shift their distribution, species composition, and abundance in response to environmental changes. Therefore zooplankton communities are important for understanding the energy flow in aquatic ecosystems and can be valuable indicators of environmental conditions. However, zooplankton in streams are still not well-studied, especially in northern Gyeonggi-do Province. This study aims to investigate the zooplankton communities in major streams in northern Gyeonggi-do Province. Methods: Zooplankton is important in the nutrient cycle and energy flow of aquatic ecosystems. Therefore, we surveyed zooplankton and measured temperature, DO, BOD, COD, T-N, T-P, and Chl-a in major streams (Sincheon, Gongneungcheon, Wangsukcheon, and Gapyeongcheon Streams) and stagnant water (Gomoji Reservoir). Results: The water quality in Gapyeongcheon Stream was the highest grade, while that of Gomoji Reservoir was mesoeutrophic and eutrophic during the research period. In the zooplankton community, Nauplius, Rotaria, and Monostyla spp. were dominant in Sincheon, Gongneungcheon, and Wangsukcheon Streams, and the dominance index was also high. In the case of Gapyeongcheon Stream, it was found that water quality and aquatic ecosystem health were good, and the lowest dominance index reflected this. In Gomoji Reservoir, Polyarthra spp., Nauplius, and Bosmina longirostris, which can be easily observed as eutrophication progresses, showed a high dominance rate. Therefore, it is necessary to monitor the progress of eutrophication in further research. Conclusions: We collected data on the zooplankton communities in streams and investigated their characteristics. As a result, specific species were found to be dominant at each survey sites and some of them are known to be observed as eutrophication progresses. Therefore, we should investigate the zooplankton community of streams around us and apply ecological stream management.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Zollner E, Hoppe HG, Sommer U, Jurgens K. Effect of zooplankton-mediated trophic cascades on marine microbial food web components (bacteria, nanoflagellates, ciliates). Limnol Oceanogr. 2009; 54: 262-275. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.1.0262
  2. Chang KH, Imai H, Ayukawa K, Sugahara S, Nakano S, Seike Y. Impact of improved bottom hypoxia on zooplankton community in shallow eutrophic lake. KMAE. 2013; 408: 03.
  3. Uye S. Replacemnet of large copepods by small ones with eutrophication of embayments: cause and consequence. Hydrobiologia. 1994; 292: 513-519. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229979
  4. Oh HJ, Chang KH, Seo DI, Nam GS, Lee EH, Jeong HG, et al. Zooplankton community as an indicator for environmental assessment of aquatic ecosystem: Application of rotifer functional groups for evaluating water quality in eutrophic reservoirs. Journal Environment Impact Assess. 2017; 26(6): 404-417. https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2017.26.6.404
  5. Pace ML, Orcutt JD. The relative importance of protozoans, rotifers, and crustaceans in a freshwater zooplankton community. Limnology and Oceanography. 1981; 26(5): 822-830. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1981.26.5.0822
  6. Giering SL, Wells SR, Mayers KM, Schuster H, Cornwell L, Fileman E, et al. Seasonal variation of zooplankton community structure and trophic position in the Celtic Sea: a stable isotope and biovolume spectrum approach. Progress in Oceanography. 2018.
  7. Krupa EG, Barinova SS, Isbekov KB, Assylbekova SZ. The use of zooplankton distribution maps for assessment of ecological status of the Shardara reservoir (Southern Kazakhstan). Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology. 2018; 18(1): 52-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2017.10.001
  8. Kurbatova SA, Mylnikova ZM, Yershov IY, Bykova SN, Vinogradova OG. Influence of Aquatic Plants of Different Ecological Groups on Zooplankton Distribution and Abundance. Contemporary Problems of Ecology. 2018; 11(1): 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425518010080
  9. Yoo JK, Jeong JH, Nam EJ, Jeong KM, Lee SW, Myung CS. Zooplankton community and distribution in relation to water quality in the Saemangeum area, Korea: Change in zooplankton community by the construction of sea dyke. Ocean and Polar Research. 2006; 28(3): 305-315. https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2006.28.3.305
  10. Uye S, Shimazu T, Yamamuro M, Ishitobi Y, Kamiya H. Geographical and seasonal variations in mesozooplankton abundance and biomass in relation to environmental parameters in Lake Shinji-Ohashi River-Lake Nakaumi brackish-water system, Japan. Journal of Marine Systems. 2000; 26(2): 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(00)00054-3
  11. Xiong W, Ni P, Chen Y, Gao Y, Shan B, Zhan A. Zooplankton community structure along a pollution gradient at fine geographical scales in river ecosystems: The importance of species sorting over dispersal. Molecular Ecology. 2017; 26(16): 4351-4360. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14199
  12. Shin YK, Bae YW. Seasonal variation of zooplankton and indicator species in Asan Lake. Environment Science Research Institute Sangji Univ. 2001; 7(1): 7-15.
  13. National law information center. Act on water quality and aquatic ecosystem conservation. Available: http://www.law.go.kr [accessed 22 December 2015].
  14. Jo GS. An illustrated guide to freshwater zooplankton in Korea, 1st ed. Seoul: Academy press; 1993.
  15. Jeon MS, Kim BC. Handbook: freshwater plankton, 1st ed. Chuncheon: Institute of water ecological restoration; 2011.
  16. National law information center. Act on environmental policy. Available: http://www.law.go.kr [accessed 5 May 2010].
  17. Kwon YS, Bae MJ, Kim JS, Kim YJ, Kim BH, Park YS. Characterizing changes of water quality and relationships with environmental factors in the selected korean reservoirs. The Korean Society of Limnology. 2014; 47(3): 146-159.
  18. Kim HW, Jeong HG, Choi JY, Kim SK, Jeong KS, La GH, et al. Past history of freshwater zooplankton research in South Korea and Korean society of limnology and future directions. Korean Journal of Ecology And Environment. 2018; 51(1): 40-59. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2018.51.1.040
  19. Kim YD, Gong YG, Jeon CY, Song HI, Park MS, Lee CS, et al. Marine algal flora and community structure in Daejin on the mid-east coast of Korea. 2010; 43(5): 532-539. https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2010.43.5.532
  20. Choi AR, Park SJ, Kim JY, Song MY, Kong DS. The correlation between water quality and benthic macroinvertebrate community indices in the Jinwi stream. The Korean Society of Limnology. 2012; 45(1): 1-10.
  21. Sho Nakano. The monitoring of food web and coastal zooplankton community in a eutrophicbrackish reservoir, Saemangeum, [dissertation]. [Seoul]: Kyunghee University; 2015.