Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회지)

The Korean Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on the Curriculum Operation and Educational Innovation in Building Construction of Domestic Universities

국내대학의 건축시공 교육과정 운영 및 교육혁신 실태 분석

  • Kim, Jae-Yeob (Department of Architectural Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation)
  • Received : 2019.09.06
  • Accepted : 2019.10.10
  • Published : 2019.10.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Technology and society have undergone continued progress and improvement. Thus, constant changes are required for university education, which then directs social development. This study analyzed the current status of educational innovations in the field of building construction at domestic universities in South Korea. The major findings of this study are as follows. Lectures on educational innovations have been introduced in the field of building construction at domestic universities. Five out of 50 universities were found to offer lectures on innovation. Notable innovative teaching methods being introduced were team-based learning and flipped learning. The biggest difference between innovative and traditional teaching methods was whether to encourage students to perform self-directed learning. In this manner, there were also differences in evaluation methods, weekly lecture schedules and learning support tools. Thus it is determined that continuous research and efforts for innovation in university education are necessary to respond to the ever-present changes in society.

기술과 사회는 지속적으로 발전하고 있다. 발전하는 사회를 선도하는 대학교육도 끊임없이 변화가 요구된다. 본 연구는 국내대학 건축시공 분야의 교육혁신실태 분석하였다. 중요한 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 국내대학의 건축시공분야에서도 교육혁신 강의가 도입되고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 50개 대학 중에서 5개 대학에서 혁신강의를 하고 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 도입되고 있는 혁신교수법은 팀기반학습과 플립러닝이었다. 혁신강의와 전통적인 강의의 가장 큰 차이점은 학생들이 자기주도학습을 하도록 유도하는 것이었다. 이를 위해 평가방법, 주별 강의일정, 학습을 위해 지원되는 도구 등에서 차이가 발생하는 것으로 분석되었다. 사회의 변화에 부응하기 위해 대학교육의 혁신을 위한 지속적인 연구와 노력이 필요한 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Medical School Information Technology(MSIT), Korea Institute of Science Technology Evaluation and Planning(KISTEP), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology(KAIST). 10 years later korea- find a way for future jobs. Seoul(Korea): Jisik Gonggam; 2017. p. 67-156.
  2. Kim JY. The talent required to architectural engineers for the era of 4th industrial revolution. International Conference on Science and Technology Collection of Dissertations; 2017 Dec 1; Seoul, Korea. Seoul (Korea): Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment; 2017. p. 160-1.
  3. Michaelsen LK, Arletta BK, Fink LD. Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Sterling: Stylus Publishing; 2004. 304 p.
  4. Nam YJ. Present and improvement direction of architectural engineering education. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 2010 May;11(3):115-24.
  5. Kim GH, Shin Y. Building construction education adopted team-based learning. Journal of Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2014 Sep;14(6):597-604. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2014.14.6.597
  6. Kim JY, Won JS. Analysis on learning effects of the education program applying the team-based learning method for building construction, Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2017 Feb;17(1):101-9. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2017.17.1.101
  7. Noh JS. Development of application model for building construction learning applying team-based learning and flip learning [master's thesis]. [Chungju (Korea)]: Korea National University of Transportation; 2019. 46 p.
  8. Kim EH, Lim HE, Kim JY. Analysis for strategies to apply flipped learning in building construction lectures .Proceeding of Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment; 2019 May 10; Seoul, Korea. Seoul (Korea): Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environmen; 2019. p. 114-5.
  9. Lee EY. Development of a instructional design model for flipped learning combined with project based learning [master's thesis]. [Seoul (Korea)]: Seoul University; 2017. 198 p.
  10. Kim JY. Development of capstone design curriculum in architectural engineering that applies flipped learning and design thinking. Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2019 Feb;21(1):89-95.
  11. Park KB, Exploration of the possibility of flipped learning in social studies. Social Studies Education. 2014 Sep;53(3):107-20.
  12. Chang MY. The effects of population education using flipped learning on course satisfaction and recognition of marriage and childbirth. Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association. 2017 Jul;11(5):227-34. https://doi.org/10.21184/jkeia.2017.07.11.5.227
  13. Noh Y. A Study on Factors Influencing Learner Satisfaction of Team Based Learning-Focus on TBL of the subjects related with Business Administration. The e-Business Studies. 2013 Dec;14(5):93-111. https://doi.org/10.15719/geba.14.5.201312.93
  14. Jang SY, LEE JJ. Development of a team-based learning design model in higher education, Asian Journal of Education. 2015 Mar;16(1):271-302. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2015.16.1.012