DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

북한이탈주민의 문장 읽기 억양 특성-음도범위와 청지각적 평가를 중심으로

The characteristics of sentence reading intonations in North Korean defectors based on pitch range and an auditory-perceptual rating scale

  • 김다미 (이화여자대학교 언어병리학과) ;
  • 김신희 (이화여자대학교 언어병리학과) ;
  • 김지성 (이화여자대학교 언어병리학과) ;
  • 안은솔 (이화여자대학교 언어병리학과) ;
  • 조용윤 (이화여자대학교 언어병리학과) ;
  • 양윤희 (이화여자대학교 언어병리학과) ;
  • 임동선 (이화여자대학교 언어병리학과)
  • Kim, Damee (Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Shinhee (Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Jiseong (Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • An, Eunsol (Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Cho, Yongyun (Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Yang, Yoonhee (Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Yim, Dongsun (Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University)
  • 투고 : 2019.07.28
  • 심사 : 2019.09.21
  • 발행 : 2019.09.30

초록

본 연구에서는 북한이탈주민집단과 한국인집단의 운율특성을 비교하기 위하여 읽기과제(짧은글, 대화글)에서 3가지 문장 유형(평서문, 의문문, 부정문)에 따른 집단 간 음도범위와 청지각적 평가 결과의 차이가 있는지 살펴보았다. 또한, 북한이탈주민집단의 읽기과제의 3가지 문장 유형('평서문', '의문문', '부정문')의 청지각적 평가 결과와 북한이탈주민집단의 억양 자기평가 설문지의 4가지 하위유형('한국어지향도', '핸디캡정도', '한국어비유사성', '억양불만족정도')과의 상관을 살펴보고자 하였다. 본 연구의 대상자는 북한이탈주민집단 총 15명(여 11, 남 4)과 한국인집단 총 15명(여 11, 남 4)이다. 음향학적 평가에서 집단 간 읽기과제의 문장유형에 따른 차이를 확인하기 위해 삼원분산분석(three-way mixed ANOVA), 다변량분석(multivariate analysis)을 실시하였고, 청지각적 측면에 대한 분석방법으로는 비모수통계인 Mann-Whitney U Test를 사용하였다. 북한이탈주민의 억양자기평가 설문지의 하위유형 4개와 청지각적 평가의 하위유형 6가지('짧은글평서문', '짧은글의문문', '짧은글부정문', '대화글평서문', '대화글의문문', '대화글부정문')의 상관관계를 확인하기 위해 피어슨의 적률상관계수(Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient)를 산출하였다. 그 결과, 읽기과제의 모든 문장유형에서 북한이탈주민집단보다 한국인집단의 음도범위가 유의미하게 컸다. 두 번째로 집단 간 읽기과제에서 3가지 문장유형에 따른 청지각적 평가 결과, 모든 문장 유형에서 한국인집단에 비해 북한이탈주민집단의 청지각적 평가 점수가 유의미하게 낮았으며, '의문문'유형에서 점수가 가장 낮았다. 마지막으로 북한이탈주민집단의 읽기과제의 3가지 문장 유형의 청지각적 평가 결과와 억양자기평가 설문지의 하위유형간의 상관을 살펴본 결과, 설문지의 4가지 하위유형 중 '한국어지향도', '핸디캡정도', '한국어비유사성'과 3가지 문장 유형 중 '의문문'에서 유의한 상관이 나타났다. 따라서 본 연구를 통해, 북한이탈주민집단과 한국인집단의 읽기과제에서의 문장유형에 따른 음성이 청지각적으로, 음향학적으로 차이를 보이고 있음을 알 수 있으며, 한국어를 지향하고, 자신의 억양으로 인한 핸디캡이 높고, 자신의 억양이 한국어와 다르다고 생각하는 북한이탈주민일수록, '의문문'에서 가장 서울말에 가깝게 말하는 것으로 평가되었음을 알 수 있다.

This study aimed to compare the prosodic characteristics of North Korean defectors and South Koreans in three types of sentences (declarative, interrogative, and negative) in two reading tasks (short and dialogue) through acoustic analysis and auditory-perceptual evaluation. In addition, this study examined the relationship between the auditory-perceptual evaluation scores and self-assessment questionnaires on intonation for North Korean defectors. The participants were 15 North Korean defectors and 15 Korean speakers with standard Seoul accents. For statistical analysis, three-way mixed ANOVA and multivariate analysis were performed within the three types of sentences in the reading tasks through acoustic analysis and the Mann-Whitney U Test for auditory-perceptual evaluation. Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficients were also used to identify the correlations between the results of the self-assessment questionnaire on intonation and the auditory-perceptual evaluation. The North Korean defectors were found to have a significantly lower pitch range and auditory-perceptual evaluation score than South Koreans in reading tasks. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between their auditory-perceptual evaluations and self-assessment questionnaires on intonation. The study findings suggest that North Korean defectors, who face many challenges with intonation, showed a tendency to think that their intonation differed from the standard Korean intonation and showed better auditory evaluation results for interrogative sentences.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Asperger, H. (1944). Die "Autistischen psychopathen" im kindesalter. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 117(1), 76-136.
  2. Bae, J. Y. (2013). A practical study of language adaptation among North Korean refugees and education schemes: Focusing on North Korean refugees resettled in the Daegu area. Korean Language and Literature, 58, 105-132.
  3. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2017). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.57) [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
  4. Cannizzaro, M., Harel, B., Reilly, N., Chappell, P., & Snyder, P. J. (2004). Voice acoustical measurement of the severity of major depression. Brain and Cognition, 56(1), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.05.003
  5. Cho, W. C., & Cho, W. S. (2018). Analysis of the practice characteristic of education of pronunciation and intonation for North Korean refugees’ language adaptation. Review of North Korean Studies, 21(1), 208-241. https://doi.org/10.17321/rnks.2018.21.1.006
  6. Choi, M. Y., & Kim, H. S. (2013). Intonation characteristics of sentence reading by North Korean defectors. Contemporary Society and Multiculture, 3(1), 118-143.
  7. France, D. J., Shiavi, R. G., Silverman, S., Silverman, M., & Wilkes, D. M. (2000). Acoustical properties of speech as indicators of depression and suicidal risk. IEEE transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 47(7), 829-837. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.846676
  8. Gim, J. S. (2014). A study on language attitudes of North Korean migrants (Master's thesis). Yonsei University, Seoul.
  9. Gyeonggido Family & Women Research Institute. (2008). A study on the settlement support plan for North Korean refugees in Gyeonggi-do (Policy Report 2008-10). Suwon: Author.
  10. Jeon, J. M. (2010). A study on the speech acts for improving speaking ability of North Korean refugees. Urimalgeul, 49, 111-138.
  11. Jun, S. A. (2000). K-ToBI (Korean ToBI) labeling convention. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 99, 149-173.
  12. Jung, S. H. (2017). A study on language adaptation of North Korean refugees in Korea. Han-Geul, 318, 243-268. https://doi.org/10.22557/HG.2017.12.318.243
  13. Kang, J. W. (2017). The linguistic integration of the two Koreas:Centering on the language use of North Korean settlers in South Korea. Journal of Education & Culture, 23(2), 345-364. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2017.23.2.345
  14. Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2(3), 217-250.
  15. Kim, J. T. (2003). Settlement problems of North Korean defectors in South Korea. In Understanding the problem of North Korean defectors (pp. 88-106). Seoul: Korean Association for Broadcasting & Telecommunication Studies.
  16. Kim, J. W., & Seong, C. J. (2014). The prosodic characteristics of pre-school age children-related adults. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 6(3), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2014.6.3.023
  17. Kim, S. H. (2005). How to perceive the language differentiation between the two Koreas. Review of North Korean Studies, 8(2), 85-124.
  18. Kim, T. H., & Kim, S. J. (2010). The effects of speech intervention for speech naturalness of North Korean refugees using visual and auditory feedback. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 2(4), 213-221.
  19. Ko, D. H. (1988). Declarative intonation in Korean: An acoustical study of F(o) declination (Doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence.
  20. Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R., Kempster, G. B., Erman, A., & Berke, G. S. (1993). Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: Review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3601.21
  21. Kwon, S. H. (2014a). Real state of language use of Bukhanitaljumin (Immigrants from North Korea). Journal of Ewha Korean Language and Literature, 34, 91-123.
  22. Kwon, S. M. (2014b). A study on the attitude of Chinese learners of Korean on Busan dialect and aspect of using dialect. The Education of Korean Language, 34, 1-28.
  23. Lee, H. Y., & Bae, J. H. (2009). Developing programs for North Korean refugees to settle down in South Korean society: Focused on Chungbuk case. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 11(7), 335-344. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.7.335
  24. Lee, Y. G., & Kim, S. S. (2015). The aspect of linguistic communication of North-Korea refugees within South-Korea society. Proceedings of International Society for Multicultural Communication (pp. 119-129).
  25. Ministry of Education (2014). Elementary Korean-language textbook 4-1 (가). Seoul: Mirae-n.
  26. Ministry of Unification (2019). Recent Trends of North Korean defect ors policy. Retrieved from https://www.unikorea.go.kr/unikorea/business/NKDefectorsPolicy/status/lately
  27. Moon, K. H. (2006). A study of North Korean defectors' language. Seoul: National Institute of Korean Language.
  28. National Institute of Korean Language (2016). 2016 Survey on language awareness of North and South Korea (NIKL Publication No. 11-1371028-000616-01). Seoul: Author.
  29. Park, J. Y. (2009). A study of Korean Utterances of Chinese Korean Learners: Regarding dialogic intonation (Master's thesis). Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  30. Sobin., & Sackeim, H. A. (1997). Psychomotor symptoms of depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.1.4
  31. Song, G. Y., & Yoo, J. Y. (2011). The characteristics of intonation in reading sentences for adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 20(3), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.15724/jslhd.2011.20.3.007
  32. Song, Y. K., Kim, Y. S., & Lee, D. E. (2012). A study on the pronunciation and intonation of Chinese Korean language learners. Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea, 62, 145-171.
  33. Yang, B. G., & Seo, J. Y. (2007). A study on the intonation contours of students' groups by oral proficiency level. Korean Journal Speech Sciences, 14(3), 77-89.
  34. Yang, S. K. (2013). Linguistic accommodation of North Korean refugees (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul.
  35. Yi, H. S. (2007). A study of language of Saeteomin (North Koreans in South Korea). The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea, 15(2), 141-161.
  36. Yoon, I. J. (2011). Circumstantial citizens: North Korean 'Migrants' in South Korea. In K. S. Chang & S. B. Turner (Eds.), Contested citizenship in East Asia (pp. 218-239). London: Routledge.