Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Port Decentralization on Port Management and Port Development : The Mediating Effect of Port Site Centrality

항만 분권이 항만경영 및 항만개발에 미치는 영향 : 항만 현장 중심성의 매개효과

  • Yang, Hang-Jin (Dept. of International Trade, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jung, Doo-Sig (Dept. of Advanced industry Fusion, Changwon National University)
  • 양항진 (경상대학교 국제통상학과) ;
  • 정두식 (창원대학교 신산업융합학과)
  • Received : 2019.06.19
  • Accepted : 2019.09.20
  • Published : 2019.09.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was intended to analyze the effect of port decentralization on port management and port development, analyze whether port site centrality has mediated effect in relation between port decentralization and port management and port development. This study surveyed public officials and researchers who plan and execute port policies, and analyzed the influence relationship of variables and the mediating effect using multiple regression analysis. Results are as follows, First, it was analyzed that the port authority decentralization and regional-centered port policy have a positive influence on the port site centrality, and the port authority decentralization has a positive influence on port management and port development. Second, the port site centrality was confirmed to have a positive influence on port management and port development. Third, port site centrality was shown to mediate the relationship between port decentralization and port management and port development. This study suggested the positive effect of port decentralization to local government on efficient port management and port development, and the need to draw up port site-oriented policies.

본 연구는 항만분권이 항만경영과 항만개발에 미치는 영향을 분석하고, 항만현장 중심성이 항만분권과 항만경영 및 항만개발 간의 관계에서 매개효과가 있는지 확인하여 시사점을 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 항만정책을 입안하고 집행하는 중앙정부 및 지방정부 공무원과 연구기관을 대상으로 설문조사하고 다중회귀분석을 통해 변수들 간의 영향관계 및 매개효과를 분석하였다. 연구결과로 첫째, 항만분권의 세부요인인 항만권한 분권과 지역중심 항만정책은 항만현장 중심성에 긍정적 영향을 미치며, 항만권한 분권은 항만경영과 항만개발에도 긍정적 영향을 미친다고 분석되었다. 둘째, 항만현장 중심성은 항만경영과 항만개발에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 셋째, 항만현장 중심성은 항만분권과 항만경영 간의 관계 및 항만개발 간의 관계를 매개하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 지방정부로의 항만분권이 효율적 항만경영과 항만개발에 미치는 긍정적 효과와 항만 현장 중심의 정책 마련이 필요함을 제시하였다는데 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. C. Y. Jun, J. P. Lee & G. S. Kim. (2010). The Response to Delegation & Devolution of Port Management to the Local Autonomous Entity. Korea Maritime Institute, Research Project Report, 28-51.
  2. Y. A. Ryoo & P. D. Kim. (2015). A Study on the Revitalization Strategy of the Local Decentralization : Focused on the Local Finance Autonomy, Journal of local government studies, 27(2), 221-248. https://doi.org/10.21026/jlgs.2015.27.2.221
  3. Y. H. Shin & P. M. Ryu. (2018). A Study on the Reform of Intergovernmental Grants in terms of Local Decentralization. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 22(3), 189-215. https://doi.org/10.20484/klog.22.3.8
  4. J. H. Choi. (2017). Study on the Issue of Promoting Decentralization of the Republic of Korea as the Second Leap of Decentralization : Moon Jae-In Government Launched. Korean Association for Local Government Studies, 29(3), 55-84. https://doi.org/10.21026/jlgs.2017.29.3.55
  5. S. W. Jo. (2019). The Effects of compassion and Virtue experienced by police officer on Organizational Identification : Mediating effects of positive emotions and moderating effect of collective self-esteem. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(5), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.5.001
  6. H. S. Lee, S. H. Lee. (2017). Diagnosis of Organizational Culture : Focused on Public Institutions. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(3), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.3.9
  7. H. T. Choi. (2018). Analysis of policy priorities for strengthening the capacity of local public officials, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(11), 345-351. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.11.345
  8. J. S. Lim & Y. J. Roh. (2000). A Study on the Co-opetition Strategies for Decentralization of Port Management, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 20(5), 2135-2153.
  9. H. T. Kim, J. S. Haik & J. K. Woo. (2000). A Study on the Improvement of Port Management in Local Government, Korea Maritime Institute, Research Project Report, 87-102.
  10. Y. W. Hwang & Y. C. Song. (2011). A Study on the Development Governance of Hyunpo Port, Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(12), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.12.35
  11. H. J. Yang, K. B. Choi. (2018), A Study on Improvement and Problems in the Change to Port Administration System by Decentralization, The Journal of Maritime Business, 41, 54-63.
  12. J. J. Wang, Adolf K. N, D. Olivier. (2004). Port governance in China : a review of policies in an era of internationalizing port management practices, Transport Policy, Vol.11, 237-249. DOI : 10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.11.003
  13. S. K. Wu, X. L, W. Shi & Z. Yang. (2016). Influence of local government on port investment: implications of China's decentralized port governance system, Maritime Policy & Management, 43(7), 777-796. DOI : 10.1080/03088839.2016.1163431
  14. V. R. Caldeirinha, J. A. Felicio, S. F. d. Cunha & L. M. d. Luz. (2018). The nexus Between port governance and performance, Maritime Policy & Management, 45(7), 877-888. DOI : 10.1080/03088839.2018.1485076
  15. U. S. Kim & W. C. Ahn. (2010). Counterplan of City of Incheon for Devolution of Port Management System, Incheon Development Institute Research Report, 115-125.
  16. B. J. Park & H. J. Yang. (2011). Effects of Port Management System on the Change and Countermeasures in Gyeongnam Province, Gyeongnam Development Institute Policy Focus, 31-41.
  17. R. M .Baron, D. A. Kenny. (1986). The moderator -mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. DOI : 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
  18. M. E. Sobel (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological methodology, 13, 290-312. DOI : 10.2307/270723