DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Direction Changes on the Muscular Activity of the Lower Extremities During Seated Reaching Exercises

  • Kim, Jwa-Jun (Department of Physical Therapy, Choonhae College of Health Sciences) ;
  • Kim, Dae-Kyung (Korea Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Association Busan Branch) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Yong (Rehabilitation Center, Busan Medical Center) ;
  • Shin, Jae-Wook (Rehabilitation Center, Busan Medical Center) ;
  • Park, Se-Yeon (Department of Physical Therapy, Kaya University)
  • Received : 2019.05.19
  • Accepted : 2019.05.30
  • Published : 2019.08.31

Abstract

Purpose: Although multi-directional reaching exercises are commonly used clinically, the effects of specific movement directions on the muscle systems of the lower extremities have not been explored. We therefore investigated lower extremity muscle activity during reaching exercises with different sagittal and horizontal plane movements. Methods: The surface electromyography responses of the bilateral rectus femoris, tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, and gastrocnemius muscles were measured during reaching exercises in three directions in the horizontal plane (neutral, $45^{\circ}$ horizontal shoulder adduction, and $45^{\circ}$ abduction) and three directions in the sagittal plane (neutral, $120^{\circ}$ flexion, and $60^{\circ}$ flexion). A total of 20 healthy, physically active participants completed six sets of reaching exercises. Two-way repeated ANOVA was performed: body side (ipsilateral and contralateral) was set as the intra-subject factor and direction of reach as the inter-subject factor. Results: Reaching at $45^{\circ}$ horizontal shoulder adduction significantly increased the activity of the contralateral rectus femoris and gastrocnemius muscles, while $45^{\circ}$ horizontal shoulder abduction activated the ipsilateral rectus femoris and gastrocnemius muscles. The rectus femoris activity was significantly higher with reaching at a $120^{\circ}$ shoulder flexion compared to the other conditions. The gastrocnemius activity decreased significantly as the shoulder elevation angle increased from $60^{\circ}$ to $120^{\circ}$. Conclusion: Our results suggest that multi-directional reaching stimulates the lower extremity muscles depending on the movement direction. The muscles acting on two different joints responded to the changes in reaching direction, whereas the muscles acting on one joint were not activated with changes in reaching direction.

Keywords

References

  1. Abuin-Porras V, Villafane JH, Jimenez-Antona C, et al. Relationship between attention and balance: a dual-task condition study in children. Journal of Exercises Rehabilitation. 2018;14(3):349-55. https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.1836142.071
  2. Bank J, Charles K, Morgan P. What is the effect of additional physiotherapy on sitting balance following stroke compared to standard physiotherapy treatment: a systematic review. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2016;23(1):15-25. https://doi.org/10.1179/1945511915Y.0000000005
  3. Barton JE, Graci V, Hafer-Macko C, et al. Dynamic balanced reach: a temporal and spectral analysis across increasing performance demands. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2016;138(12):10-15.
  4. Cabanas-Valdes R, Cuchi GU, Bagur-Calafat C. Trunk training exercises approaches for improving trunk performance and functional sitting balance in patients with stroke: a systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(4):575-92. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-130996
  5. Cram JR, Kasman GS, Holtz J. Introduction to surface electromyography. Gaithersburg. Aspen. 1998.
  6. Crosbie J, Shepherd R, Squire T. Postural and voluntary movement during reaching in sitting: the role of the lower limbs. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 1995;28:103-26.
  7. Dean CM, Channon EF, Hall JM. Sitting training early after stroke improves sitting ability and quality and carries over to standing up but not to walking: a randomised trial. The Austrian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2007;53(2):97-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(07)70042-9
  8. Dean CM, Shepherd RB, Adams RD. Sitting balance II: reach direction and thigh support affect the contribution of the lower limbs when reaching beyond arm's length in sitting. Gait & Posture. 1999;10(2):147-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(99)00027-2
  9. De Ridder EM, Van Oosterwijck JO, Vleeming A, et al. Posterior muscle chain activity during various extension exercises: an observational study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2013;14:204. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-204
  10. Doorenbosch CA, Harlaar J, Roebroeck ME, et al. Two strategies of transferring from sit-to-stand; the activation of monoarticular and biarticular muscles. Journal of Biomechanics. 1994;27(11):1299-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(94)90039-6
  11. Hwang S, Tae K, Sohn R, et al. The balance recovery mechanisms against unexpected forward perturbation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2009;37(8):1629-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9717-y
  12. Hsu WL, Yang YR, Hong CT, et al. Ankle muscle activation during functional reach in hemiparetic and healthy subjects. American Journal of Physiscal Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2005;84(10):749-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000176573.64931.94
  13. Katz-Leurer M, Fisher I, Neeb M, et al. Reliability and validity of the modified functional reach test at the sub-acute stage post-stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2009;31(3):243-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280801927830
  14. Kusoffsky A, Apel I, Hirschfeld H. Reaching-lifting-placing task during standing after stroke: coordination among ground forces, ankle muscle activity, and hand movement. Archives of Physiscal Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2001;82(5):650-60. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.22611
  15. Yoshiko A, Kaji T, Sugiyama H, et al. Effect of 12-month resistance and endurance training on quality, quantity, and function of skeletal muscle in older adults requiring long-term care. Experimental Gerontology. 2017;98:230-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2017.08.036