DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Virtual Upper Extremity Training Using the RAPAEL Smart Glove on Physical and Cognitive Function in Stroke Survivors -A Single Group Study-

  • Song, Chiang-Soon (Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Chosun University) ;
  • Lim, Jae-Heon (Department of Physical Therapy, Wonkwang Health Science University) ;
  • Jeon, Byeong-Hyeon (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Honam University) ;
  • Lee, Hye-Sun (Department of Occupational Therapy, Kwangju Women's University)
  • Received : 2019.03.29
  • Accepted : 2019.05.17
  • Published : 2019.08.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a virtual upper extremity training program using the RAPAEL Smart Glove on upper extremity function in stroke survivors with chronic hemiparesis and to focus the training program development using the Smart Glove as a feasibility study. Methods: This study was conducted using a single group and pre-post test research design in the outpatient departments of local rehabilitation units. Ten chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors with a diagnosis of first stroke received therapeutic rehabilitation at the rehabilitation units. All the participants used a virtual reality program with the RAPAEL Smart Glove for 30 minutes per session 3 days a week over 8 weeks. They also received conventional occupational therapy with functional electrical stimulation for 40 minutes per session 3 days a week for 8 weeks as an additional therapy. To analyze the effects of this therapeutic intervention, four clinical measures, including the box-block test (BBT), the Wolf motor function test (WMFT), the trail-making score, the Jebsen Taylor hand function test (JTHFT), and grip strength, were used. Results: Upon completion of the intervention in week 8, all the participants demonstrated significant WMFT, JTT, BBT, grip strength, and trail-making score gains compared to the respective baselines at week 0. Conclusion: This study suggests that virtual upper extremity training using the RAPAEL Smart Glove has a reasonable and beneficial effects on upper extremity function in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors.

Keywords

References

  1. Allgower K, Hermsdorfer J. Fine motor skills predict performance in the Jebsen Taylor hand function test after stroke. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2017;128(10):1858-1871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.07.408
  2. Almhdawi KA, Mathiowetz VG, White M, et al. Efficacy of occupational therapy task-oriented approach in upper extremity post-stroke rehabilitation. Occupational Therapy International. 2016;23(4):444-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.1447
  3. Bae JH, Kang SH, Seo KM, et al. Relationship between grip and pinch strength and activities of daily living in stroke patients. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2015;39(5):752-762. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.5.752
  4. Ballester BR, Maier M, San Segundo Mozo RM, et al. Counteracting learned non-use in chronic stroke patients with reinforcement-induced movement therapy. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation. 2016;13(1):74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0178-x
  5. Chen HM, Chen CC, Hsueh IP, et al. Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair. 2009;23(5):435-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308331146
  6. Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, et al. Population-based norms for the mini-mental status examination by age and educational level. JAMA. 1993;269(18): 2386-2391. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03500180078038
  7. Demain S, Burridge J, Ellis-Hill C. Assistive technologies after stroke: self-management or fending for yourself? A focus group study. BMC Health Services Research. 2013;13:334. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-334
  8. Hodics TM, Nakatsuka K, Upreti B, et al. Wolf motor function test for characterizing moderate to severe hemiparesis in stroke patients. Achieved Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2012;93(11):1963-1967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.002
  9. Ikbali Afsar S, Mirzayev I, Umit Yemisci O, et al. Virtual reality in upper extremity rehabilitation of stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Stroke Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2018;27(12):3473-3478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.08.007
  10. Jung HT, Kim H, Jeong J, et al. Feasibility of using the RAPAEL smart glove in upper limb physical therapy for patients after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Conference Proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2017;2017:3856-3859.
  11. Kiper P, Szczudlik A, Agostini M, et al. Virtual reality for upper limb rehabilitation in subacute and chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Achieved Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2018;99(5):834-842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.023
  12. KOSIS, Korean Statistical Information Service. http://kosis.kr/eng/, searched data 1 February, 2019.
  13. Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, et al. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the stroke impact scale. Stroke. 2002;33(7):1840-1844. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000019289.15440.F2
  14. Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, et al. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database System Review. 2015;12(2):CD008349.
  15. Maier M, Rubio Ballester B, Duff A, et al. Effect of specific over nonspecific VR-based rehabilitation on poststroke motor recovery: a systematic meta-analysis. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair. 2019;Jan 30:1545968318820169.
  16. Muir RT, Lam B, Honjo K, et al., Trail making test elucidates neural substrates of specific poststroke executive dysfunctions. Stroke. 2015;46(10):2755-2761. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009936
  17. O'Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ, Fulk GD. Physical rehabilitation, 6th ed. Philadelphia. F.A. Davis Co. 2014.
  18. Park J, Jung HT, Daneault JF, et al. Effectiveness of the RAPAEL smart board for upper limb therapy in stroke survivors: a pilot controlled trial. Conference Proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2018;2018:2466-2469.
  19. Shimodozono M, Noma T, Nomoto Y, et al. Benefits of a repetitive facilitative exercise program for the upper paretic extremity after subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair. 2013;27(4):296-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968312465896
  20. Teasell RW, Fernandz MM, McIntyre A, et al. Rethinking the continuum of stroke rehabilitation. Achieved Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2014;95(4):595-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.014
  21. Veerbeek JM, Langbroek-Amersfoort AC, van Wegen EE, et al. Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair. 2017;31(2):107-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968316666957
  22. Weiss P, Kizony R, Feintuch U, et al. Virtual reality in neurorehabilitation. In: Selzer M, Cohen L, Gage F, et al., editor(s). Textbook of neural repair and rehabilitation. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 2006.