DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Improvement of Wetland Conservation Plan for Upo Wetland Protected Area

우포늪 습지보호지역 보전계획 개선방안

  • Received : 2019.07.15
  • Accepted : 2019.08.21
  • Published : 2019.08.31

Abstract

The Wetland Conservation Plan is used as a tool to set the management direction of wetland protected areas, and which is establishing a plan for the conservation, wise-use, and management based on wetland's condition. This study was conducted to establish a conservation plan considering the functions and management conditions of Upo wetland protected area. To this end, there are analyzed the current issues, plans and implementation status of Upo Wetland Conservation Plans in the past. The management elements to be considered in establishing the Wetland Conservation Plan were selected through prior research analysis and the priority of those elements was identified through the AHP. As a result, it was found that lack of considering the changes and performance evaluation of the existing plans in wetlands, conducting short-term projects related to maintenance original function of wetland, different management methods for wetland protected areas and other adjacent areas, lack of understanding and cooperation by stakeholders, inconsistencies in timing of the Conservation Plan and survey of wetland protected areas. In order to improve the problem, it needs to include the performance evaluation stage of establishing the conservation plan, strengthen cooperation of stakeholders and expertise, continuing of projects for wetlands' maintenance, priority of the project considering the management side, and to adjust the timing of plans to improve data availability.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi JE, Chae HM, Cho DG, et al. 2016. Understanding the Managing Conditions and Improvement Strategies of Domestic Protected Areas in Korea -Focus on Ecological and Landscape Conservation Areas and Wetland Protected Areas-. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 19(1): 111-120 (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2016.19.1.111
  2. Choi JY, Kim SK, Yun JH and Joo GJ. 2017. Wetland Assessment and Improvement of Evaluation Index Using Rapid Assessment Method(RAM). Journal of the Korea Water Association, 50(3) : 314-324 (in Korean with English summary)
  3. Hong MG and Kim JG. 2017. An analysis of trends in wetland function assessments and further suggestions. Journal of Wetlands Research. 19(1): 1-15 (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2017.19.1.001
  4. Huh HY and An DM. 2005. A Study on Management Effectiveness Evaluation of Natural Protected Areas- Focusing on Review of Management Effectiveness Evaluation Tools-. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 45: 3-21 (in Korean)
  5. Jo HS and Seo HJ. 2018. AHP Analysis Techniques for the Weighted Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Disaster Safety Management Systems. Journal of the Korean Anti-Disaster Society, 18(5) : 43-53 (in Korean with English summary)
  6. Kang SJ. 2004. Development and application of a method for rapid wetland assessment considering functions of wetlands in Korea. Master's thesis, EWha Womans University (in Korean)
  7. Kim BH. 2011. Enhancing Management System of the Protected Areas in Korea. Ph.D dissertation, Seoul National University (in Korean)
  8. Koo BH and Kim KG. 2001. A Study on the Assessment for the Functions of Inland Wetlands Using RAM(Rapid Assessment Method). Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 4(3) : 38-48 (in Korean with English summary)
  9. KOSERT and Eco-tech co.. 2002. Development of Conservation and Management Measures for Upo Marsh Ecosystem Conservation Area in Changnyeong. (in Korean)
  10. Kusler, J. and Riexinger, P.(1986) National Wetland Assessment Symposium: Albany NY, Association of state wetland managers, Proceedings, p. 331
  11. Kwon YD and Lee SH. 2010. Investigating Multi-Attributes for Rural Water Development Project Impacts in Regional Areas: Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Korean Agricultural Policy Review. 37(1) : 55-69 (in Korean with English summary)
  12. Ministry of Environment. 2015a. Natural environment protected area business manual. (in Korean)
  13. Ministry of Environment. 2015b. 3rd Basic Plan for Conservation of Natural Environment (2016-2025) (in Korean)
  14. Ministry of Environment. 2016a. Effectiveness Evaluation of Management in Protected Areas (II) (in Korean)
  15. Nakdong River Basin Environmental Office. 2011. The Wetland Conservation & Usage Plan of Upo Wetlands Protected Area (in Korean)
  16. Nakdong River Basin Environmental Office. 2016. The Wetland Conservation Plan of Upo Wetlands Protected Area (in Korean)
  17. Nassauer, J.I. 2004, Monitoring the success of metropolitan wetlands restorations: Cultural sustainability and ecological function. Wetlands, 24(4), pp. 756-765 https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0756:MTSOMW]2.0.CO;2
  18. Park MO, Yang SB, Whwang YR, Seo HS and Koo BH. 2018. A Basic Study on the Evaluation Index of Village Wetland Ecosystem Services Using Function Evaluation Methods. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 21(1): 119-132 (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2018.21.1.119
  19. Turner, R.K., van den Bergh, JCJM, Soderqvist, T., Barendregt, A., van der Straaten, J, Maltby, E. and van Ierland, E.C. 2000. Ecologicaleconomic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecological Economics, 35(1), pp. 7-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00164-6
  20. Um DY, Shim MY and Shin KJ. 2013. Elicitation of Ecological Wetland's Creating & Maintaining Conditions through GIS & AHP Analysis. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography. 31(1): 29-40 (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2013.31.1.29
  21. https://www.cng.go.kr
  22. https://www.epa.gov/wetlands
  23. http://www.me.go.kr
  24. http://www.wetland.go.kr
  25. https://www.ramsar.org