DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Seafarers' Behavioral Error on Collision Accidents

충돌사고에 대한 해기사의 행동오류 분석

  • Yim, Jeong-Bin (Division of Navigation Science, Korea Maritime & Ocean University)
  • 임정빈 (한국해양대학교 항해학부)
  • Received : 2019.05.31
  • Accepted : 2019.06.26
  • Published : 2019.08.31

Abstract

Behavioral errors of the seafarers are one of the major causes of collisions and are usually corrected through education and training. To correct this behavioral error, the structure in which the behavioral error occurs needs to be identified and analyzed. For this purpose, behavior observation data were obtained through ship maneuvering simulation for collision encounters. The 9-state behavior classification frame proposed by Reason was used for the behavior observation and 50 university students were involved in the experiment. Behavioral analysis used the behavioral model of collision avoidance success and failure, which was developed from the 9-state Left-to-Right Hidden Markov modeling technique. As a result of the experiment, the difference between behaviors of success and failure of collision avoidance was clearly identified, and the linkage between 9-state behaviors, required to prevent collision, was derived.

해기사의 행동오류는 충돌사고의 주요한 원인 중 하나이고, 교육과 훈련을 통하여 보정이 가능한 것으로 알려져 있다. 이러한 행동오류의 보정을 위해서는 행동오류가 발생되는 구조의 식별이 필요하다. 이를 위하여, 충돌조우상황에 대한 선박조종 시뮬레이션을 통해서 행동관측 데이터를 획득하고, 행동관측에는 Reason이 제안한 9-상태 행동오류 분류 프레임을 이용하였으며, 실험에는 50명의 대학생들이 참가하였다. 행동분석에는 충돌회피의 성공과 실패로 구분한 행동 모델을 이용하였는데, 이 모델은 9-상태의 Left-to-Right 구조를 갖는 은닉 마르코프 모델링 기법을 이용하여 개발하였다. 실험결과, 충돌회피의 성공과 실패에 대한 행동들 사이의 차이가 명확하게 식별되었고, 충돌예방에 필요한 9-상태 행동들 사이의 연계관계가 도출되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Allianz(2018), Safety and Shipping Review 2018, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty(AGCS), 10.
  2. Forney, G. D.(1973), The viterbi algorithm, Proceedings of the IEEE, 61(3), 268-278. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1973.9030
  3. Konsberg(2019), K-SIM NAVIGATION, https://www.kongsberg.com/digital/products/maritime-simulation/k-sim-navigation(accessed on 27 May 2019).
  4. McCallum, A.(2004), Hidden Markov Models Baum Welch Algorithm.
  5. Park, D. J., Yang, H. S. and Yim, J. B.(2019), A Study on the Estimation of Optimal Probability Distribution Function for Seafarers' Behavior Error, Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 1-8.
  6. Phan, M. T., Fremont, V., Thouvenin, I., Sallak, M. and Cherfaoui, V.(2015), Estimation of driver awareness of pedestrian based on Hidden Markov Model. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium(IV), pp. 970-975.
  7. Rasmussen, J.(1983), Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models, IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, (3), pp. 257-266.
  8. Rasmussen, J. and Vicente, K. J.(1989), Coping with human errors through system design: implications for ecological interface design, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 31(5), pp. 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(89)90014-X
  9. Rabiner, L. R. and Juang, B. H.(1986), An introduction to hidden Markov models. ieee assp magazine, 3(1), pp. 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1109/MASSP.1986.1165381
  10. Rabiner, L. R.(1989), A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition, Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2), pp. 257-286. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.18626
  11. Reason, J.(2000), Human error: Models and management, BMJ, 320, pp. 768-770. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768
  12. Viterbi, A.(1967), Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE transactions on Information Theory, 13(2), pp. 260-269. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1967.1054010
  13. Yim, J. B.(2012), Probability Based Risk Evaluation Techniques for the Small-Sizes Sea Floater, Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 36, No. 10, pp. 795-801. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2012.36.10.795
  14. Yim, J. B. and Yang, Y. J.(2013), Estimating Cumulative Distribution Functions with Maximum Likelihood to Sample Data Sets of a Sea Floater Model, Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 453-462. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2013.37.5.453
  15. Yim, J. B., Kim, D. S. and Park, D. J.(2018), Modeling perceived collision risk in vessel encounter situations, Ocean Engineering, 166, pp. 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.08.003
  16. Youn, I. H., Park, D. J. and Yim, J. B.(2019), Analysis of Lookout Activity in a Simulated Environment to Investigate Maritime Accidents Caused by Human Error, Applied Sciences, 9(1), 4, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010001