한국조경학회지 (Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)

  • 제47권4호
  • /
  • Pages.24-32
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1225-1755(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9566(eISSN)
한국조경학회 (The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

미집행 도시계획시설의 잠재적 생태계 서비스 가치평가 - 서울시 공원 및 녹지를 중심으로 -

Evaluation of the Economic Value of Potential Ecosystem Services of Unexecuted Urban Planning Facilities - Focused on Urban Green Spaces and Urban Forests in Seoul -

  • 박진한 (서울연구원 도시경영연구실 구정연구지원센터, 서울특별시 은평구청 기획예산과 은평정책연구단) ;
  • 김송이 (한국문화관광연구원 관광산업연구실) ;
  • 허한결 (서울대학교 협동과정 조경학)
  • Park, Jin-Han (Local Autonomy Research Center, Dept. of Urban Management Research, Policy Inspection Team, Planning and Budget Division, Eunpyeong-gu Office, Seoul Metropolitan Government) ;
  • Kim, Song-Yi (Tourism Industry Research Division, Korea Culture & Tourism Institute) ;
  • Heo, Han-Kyul (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.05.20
  • 심사 : 2019.07.11
  • 발행 : 2019.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

국토교통부가 발표한 도시계획현황에 따르면 현재 전국의 도시계획시설 미집행면적은 약 $1,257km^2$에 이르며, 그중 공원과 녹지의 미집행면적은 약 47%를 차지한다. 특히, 서울의 경우 전체 도시계획시설의 미집행면적은 약 $66km^2$이며, 이는 전국 미집행면적의 5.24%에 해당하며, 전체 미집행면적의 약 88%가 공원과 녹지의 미집행면적으로 이는 전국의 비율보다 높게 나타났다. 또한, 이 중 약 92%가 10년 이상 된 장기 미집행 도시계획시설이다. 본 연구는 서울시 미집행 도시계획시설 중 공원과 녹지를 대상으로 메타회귀분석방법을 적용하여 도시 녹지가 제공하는 조절서비스, 지원서비스, 문화서비스에 대한 생태계 서비스의 경제적 가치를 추정하였다. 연구 결과, 서울시의 미집행 공원 및 녹지가 제공하는 조절서비스의 가치는 약 163억 9,201만 원, 지원서비스의 가치는 약 58억 7,323만 원, 문화서비스의 가치는 약 77억 8,441만원으로 나타났으며, 전체 생태계 서비스의 가치는 약 339억 2,541만 원으로 나타났다. 조절서비스와 문화서비스의 가치가 제일 높게 나타났으며, 이는 도심지에 위치한 대상지의 특성에 기인한 것으로 분석된다. 본 연구는 서울시의 미집행 공원 및 녹지에 대한 생태계 서비스의 가치를 평가하였다는 것에 의의가 있으며, 본 연구의 결과는 도시계획 혹은 정책결정의 과정에서 유용하게 쓰일 수 있을 뿐 아니라, 최근 전 세계적으로 대두되고 있는 생태계 서비스 지불제의 개념을 적용한다면 미집행 도시계획시설 보상의 근거자료로 유용하게 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

According to the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, the total area of unexecuted urban planning facilities in Korea is about $1,257km^2$, of which 47% is the unexecuted urban green space and forests. In the case of Seoul, the total area of unexecuted urban planning facilities is about $66km^2$, which is 5.24% of the total unexecuted area in the entire country. In Seoul, approximately 88% of the total unexecuted area is urban green space and forests, which is higher than the national rate. About 92% of the unexecuted urban planning facilities are long-term unexecuted urban planning facilities that are more than 10 years old. This study assessed the economic value of potential ecosystem services, focusing on the regulation service, supporting service, and cultural service, for urban green space and forests of unexecuted urban planning facilities in Seoul by using meta-regression analysis. As a result, the value of the regulation service provided by the urban green space and forests in Seoul was about 16.39 billion KRW, the value of the supporting service was about 5.8 billion KRW, and the cultural service value was about 7.78 billion KRW. The total value of ecosystem services is about 33.93 billion KRW. The values of regulation service and cultural service were the highest, and that was attributed to the characteristics of the downtown area. The significance of this study is to evaluate the value of ecosystem services for unexecuted urban planning facilities in Seoul. The results of this study can be used not only in the process of urban planning or policymaking but also land compensation methods applying the concept of an ecosystem service payment system.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adger, N., K. Brown, R. Cervigni and D. Moran(1994) Towards estimating total economic value of forests in Mexico. CSERGE Working Paper GEC 94-21.
  2. Ahn, S. E. and J. K. Kim(2006) An application of benefit transfer to outdoor recreation values in Korea, Korea Environment Institute.
  3. Bolund, P. and S. Hunhammar(1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics 29(2): 293-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
  4. Boutwell, J. and W. John(2013) Benefit transfer: A review of methodologies and challenges. Resources 2(4): 517-527. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources2040517
  5. Boyd, J. and B. Spencer(2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics 63(2-3): 616-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002
  6. Brander, L., R. Brouwer and A. Wagtendonk(2013) Economic valuation of regulating services provided by wetlands in agricultural landscapes: A meta-analysis. Ecological Engineering 56: 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.104
  7. Brouwer, R.(2000) Environmental value transfer: State of the art and future prospects. Ecological Economics 32(1): 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00070-1
  8. Camps-Calvet, M., J. Langemeyer, L. Calvet-Mir and E. Gomez-Baggethunde(2016) Ecosystem services provided by urban gardens in Barcelona, Spain: Insights for policy and planning. Environmental Science & Policy 62: 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.007
  9. Choi, A. S. and Y. S. Eom(2018) Measuring economic values of amenity services from urban greenspaces in the Seoul metropolitan area using choice experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics Review 27(1): 105-138. https://doi.org/10.15266/KEREA.2018.27.1.105
  10. Choi, H. S., J. G. Choi, J. Y. Shin, H. U. Hong, C. G. Park, J. E. Kang and G. S. Lee(2018) Environmental effects and policy response from the automatic invalidation of long-term un-implemented urban parks. Korea Environmental Institute.
  11. Cohen, J.(1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2nd Edition.
  12. Costanza, R., R. D'Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. V. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R. G. Raskin, P. Sutton and M. van den Belt(1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630): 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
  13. Daily, G. C., T. Soderqvist, S. Aniyar, K. Arrow, P. Dasgupta, P. R. Ehrlich, C. Folke, A. Jansson, B.-O. Jansson, N. Kautsky, S. Levin, J. Lubchenco, K.-G. Maler, D. Simpson, D. Starrett, D. Tilman and B. Walker(2000) Value of nature and the nature of value. Science 289(5478): 395-396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5478.395
  14. Daily, G. C.(1997) Nature's Services. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  15. de Groot, R.(2006) Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 75(3-4): 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.016
  16. de Groot, R., M. A. Wilson and R. M. J. Boumans(2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41(3): 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
  17. Eom, Y. S., A. S. Choi, S. G. Kim and J. O. Kim(2019) A hedonic valuation of urban green space in Seoul, Korea. Environmental and Resource Economics Review 28(1): 61-93.
  18. Ferguson, C. J.(2009) An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 40(5): 532-538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808
  19. Freeman III, M., J. A. Herriges and C. L. Kling(2010) The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Routledge.
  20. Gunawardena, M. and J. S. Rowan(2005) Economic valuation of a mangrove ecosystem threatened by shrimp aquaculture in Sri Lanka. Environmental Management 36(4): 535-550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0286-9
  21. Haase, D., N. Larondelle, E. Andersson, M. Artmann, S. Borgstrom, J. Breuste, E. Gomez-Baggethun, A. Gren, Z. Hamstead and R. Hansen(2014) A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio 43(4): 413-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0
  22. Han, S. Y. and K. Choi(1996) Use of dichotomous choice contingent valuation method to value forest recreational benefit: In the case of Mt. Palgong provincial park. Korean Journal of Forest Economics 4(1): 43-56.
  23. Han, S. Y., M. H. Lee, R. H. Yoo and J. J. Kim(2007) Estimating the stock value of Sobaeksan National Park: Application of turnbull distribution-free model. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 11(4): 37-45.
  24. Hwang, G., Y. Lee, C. Kim, M. Bang and S. Park(2017) Policy directions for resolving un-implemented long-term urban and Public Facility in Gyeonggi-Do, Korea, Gyonggi Development Institute.
  25. Irvine, K. N., S. L. Warber, P. Devine-Wright and K. J. Gaston(2013) Understanding urban green space as a health resource: A qualitative comparison of visit motivation and derived effects among park users in Sheffield, UK. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 10(1): 417-442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10010417
  26. Jobstvogt, N., V. Watson and J. O. Kenter(2014) Looking below the surface: The cultural ecosystem service values of UK marine protected areas (MPAs). Ecosystem Services 10: 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.006
  27. Jung, D. J., K. H. Kang, J. Heo, M. S. Sohn and H. S. Kim(2011) Valuation of biodiversity and ecosystem services using national forest inventory data. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 20(5): 615-625. https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2011.20.5.615
  28. Kang, K. R.(2010) Comparative study on monetary estimates of the preservation value of recreational forests through contingent valuation methods. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 38(2): 25-36.
  29. Kim, J. H., R. H. Kim, H. J. Youn, S. W. Lee, H. T. Choi, J. J. Kim, C. R. Park and K. D. Kim(2012) Valuation of nonmarket forest resources. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 16(4): 9-18. https://doi.org/10.34272/FOREST.2012.16.4.002
  30. Kim, N. W.(2017) Legal review on the long-term exploitation of urban parks. Public Land Law Review 79: 147-174.
  31. Kim, T.(2008) Comparison of economic value between mountain and marine national park: Focused on Mt. Juwang and Dadohae Marine National Park. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 12(4): 9-18.
  32. Kim, W., W. Kim, Y. Byun and J. A. Kim(2010) A study on ensuring carbon reservoir and reducing carbon emissions plan. Seoul, Seoul Development Institute.
  33. Koirala, I. and N. Adhikari(2015) Cost-benefit analysis of a community forest in Nepal. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 34(3): 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2014.1003074
  34. Koo, M., D. K. Lee and T. Y. Jung(2012) A study on the contexts of ecosystem services in the policymaking process. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 15(5): 85-102. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2012.15.5.085
  35. Kwon, O. S.(2007) Environmental Economics. Seoul: ParkYoungSa.
  36. Langemeyer, J., F. Baro, P. Roebeling and E. Gomez-Baggethun (2015) Contrasting values of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas: the case of park Montjuic in Barcelona. Ecosystem Services 12: 178-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.016
  37. Lee, I., K. Jo, G. Wang, M. Park and J. Sung(2011) A study of policy strategy for development and management of urban parks for low-carbon & green growth. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.
  38. Lee, J. H. and S. Y. Han(1998) An application of tobit model to value environmental goods. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 2(1): 79-90.
  39. Lee, S. R., Y. J. Lee and J. E. Lee(2018) Responsive Strategies for sunset release of long-term unexecuted urban planning facilities in Gyeonggi-Do, Gyeonggi Research Institute.
  40. MA (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment)(2005) Ecosystems and Human well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  41. MA (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment)(2003) Ecosystems and Human well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  42. Ministry of Environment(2012) A Study on the Improvement of Ecological Function of Urban Green Space.
  43. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport(2017) The Statistics Report of Urban Planning Status.
  44. Mo, Y., J. H. Park, Y. H. Son and D. K. Lee(2016) Establishment of additional protected areas and applying Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) for sustainability of Suncheonman-Bay. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 19(1): 171-184. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2016.19.1.171
  45. Moon, K. I. and C. H. Yim(2001) Estimating the benefit of nonperforming urban planning facilies by contingent valuation method. Journal of Korea Planning Association 36(1): 287-299.
  46. Muthke, T. and K. Holm-Mueller(2004) National and international benefit transfer testing with a rigorous test procedure. Environmental and Resource Economics 29(3): 323-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-004-5268-8
  47. Odum, E. P.(1959) Fundamentals of Ecology. Saunders.
  48. OECD(2010) Paying for Biodiversity: Enhancing the Cost-effectiveness of Payment for Ecosystem Services.
  49. Park, J. H., D. K. Lee, C. Park, H. G. Kim, T. Y. Jung and S. Kim(2017) Park accessibility impacts housing prices in Seoul, Sustainability 9(2): 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020185
  50. Plieninger, T., S. Dijks, E. Oteros-Rozas and C. Bieling(2013) Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33: 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013
  51. Quintas-Soriano, C., B. Martin-Lopez, F. Santos-Martin, M. Loureiro, C. Montes, J. Benayas and M. Garcia-Llorente(2016) Ecosystem services values in Spain: A meta-analysis. Environmental Science and Policy 55: 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.001
  52. Roebeling, P., M. Saraiva, A. Palla, I. Gnecco, C. Teotonio, T. Fidelis, F. Martins, H. Alves and J. Rocha(2016) Assessing the socio-economic impacts of green/blue space, urban residential and road infrastructure projects in the confluence (Lyon): A hedonic pricing simulation approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 1-18.
  53. Rosenberger, R. S. and J. B. Loomis(2000) Using meta-analysis for benefit transfer: In-sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database. Water Resources Research 36(4): 1097-1107. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900006
  54. Rosenberger, R. S. and J. B. Loomis(2001) Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation use values: A technical document supporting the forest service strategic plan (2000 Revision), general technical report-rocky mountain research station. USDA Forest Service.
  55. Ryu, D. H. and D. K. Lee(2013) Evaluation on economic value of the greenbelt's ecosystem services in the Seoul metropolitan region. Journal of Korea Planning Association 48(3): 279-292.
  56. Sander, H. A. and R. G. Haight(2012) Estimating the economic value of cultural ecosystem services in an urbanizing area using hedonic pricing. Journal of Environmental Management 113: 194-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.031
  57. Schaubroeck, T., G. Deckmyn, O. Giot, M. Campioli, C. Vanpoucke, K. Verheyen, B. Rugani, W. Achten, H. Verbeeck, J. Dewulf and B. Muys(2016) Environmental impact assessment and monetary ecosystem service valuation of an ecosystem under different future environmental change and management scenarios: A case study of a Scots pine forest. Journal of Environmental Management 173: 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.005
  58. Seoul(2012) Reorganization City Planning of Unexecuted Urban Planning Facilities.
  59. Seoul(2014) A Study on the Management Plan of Private Operation City Planning Facilities.
  60. Seoul(2015) Basic Plan of Urban Green Space of Seoul in 2030.
  61. Shrestha, R. K. and J. B. Loomis(2001) Testing a meta-analysis model for benefit transfer in international outdoor recreation. Ecological Economics 39(1): 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00193-8
  62. TEEB(2010) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations, UNEP/Earthprint.
  63. Tol, R. S. J.(2013) Targets for global climate policy: An overview. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37(5): 911-928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2013.01.001
  64. Tol, R. S. J.(2015) Modified Ramsey discounting for climate change, CESifo Group Munich.
  65. Tyrvainen, L. and H. Vaananen(1998) The economic value of urban forest amenities: An application of the contingent valuation method. Landscape and Urban Planning 43(1-3): 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00103-0
  66. van Berkel, D. B. and P. H. Verburg(2014) Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecological Indicators 37: 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.025
  67. Vandermeulen, V., A. Verspecht, B. Vermeire, G. Van Huylenbroeck and X. Gellynck(2011) The use of economic valuation to create public support for green infrastructure investments in urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 103(2): 198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.010
  68. Yoo, J. C., M. Kim, K. Kong and B. I. Yoo(2010) Estimation of public values of forest in Korea: Using choice experiment approach. Journal of Rural Development 33(4): 43-62.
  69. Yoon, E. J., E. J. Song, Y. H. Jeung, E. Y. Kim and D. K. Lee(2018) Spatial decision support system for development and conservation of unexecuted urban park using ACO: Ant colony optimization. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 21(2), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2018.21.2.39