The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education (컴퓨터교육학회논문지)

The Korean Association of Computer Education (한국컴퓨터교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring Information Ethics Issues based on Text Mining using Big Data from Web of Science

Web of Science 빅데이터를 활용한 텍스트 마이닝 기반의 정보윤리 이슈 탐색

  • Received : 2019.05.18
  • Accepted : 2019.05.30
  • Published : 2019.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore information ethics issues based on academic big data from Web of Science (WoS) and to provide implications for information ethics education in informatics subject. To this end, 318 published papers from WoS related to information ethics were text mined. Specifically, this paper analyzed the frequency of key-words(TF, DF, TF-IDF), information ethics issues using topic modeling, and frequency of appearances by year for each issue. This paper used 'tm', 'topicmodel' package of R for text mining. The main results are as follows. First, this paper confirmed that the words 'digital', 'student', 'software', and 'privacy' were the main key-words through TF-IDF. Second, the topic modeling analysis showed 8 issues such as 'Professional value', 'Cyber-bullying', 'AI and Social Impact' et al., and the proportion of 'Professional value' and 'Cyber-bullying' was relatively high. This study discussed the implications for information ethics education in Korea based on the results of this analysis.

본 연구의 목적은 Web of Science(WoS)에서 제공하는 학술 빅데이터를 활용하여 정보윤리 이슈를 탐색하고 향후 정보과 정보윤리 교육을 위한 시사점을 제공하는 것에 있다. 이를 위해 WoS에서 제공하는 학술논문 중 정보윤리와 관련해 출판된 318편의 논문을 텍스트 마이닝 하였다. 구체적으로는 R을 활용해 주요키워드에 대한 빈도 분석(TF, DF, TF-IDF), 토픽 모델링 기반의 정보윤리 이슈 분석, 그리고 각 이슈에 대한 연도별 출연 빈도를 분석하여 정보윤리 연구의 경향성을 탐색하였다. 주요 결과를 살펴보면 다음과 같다. 첫째, TF-IDF를 통해 'digital', 'student', 'software', 'privacy' 등의 단어가 주요 키워드임을 확인하였다. 둘째, 토픽 모델링 분석 결과, 'Professional value', 'Cyber-bullying', 'AI and Social Impact' 등을 포함한 총 8개 이슈로 분석되었고, 그 중, 'Professional value'와 'Cyber-bullying' 이슈가 상대적으로 높은 비율을 차지하고 있었다. 본 연구는 이러한 분석 결과를 기초로 우리나라 정보윤리 교육을 시사점을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. WEF (2016). World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2016 : Mastering the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Davos-Klosters, Switzerland 20-23 January.
  2. Sandra, W. (2017). Normative Challenges of Identification in the Internet of Things: Privacy, Profiling, Discrimination, and the GDPR. Computer Law & Security Review, 34 (3), 436-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.02.002
  3. Sung, W., Kim, D. (2016). Effects of Internet Users' Perception Regarding the R isks and Benefits of the Internet on Cybers pace Trust. International Journal of Security and Its Applications, 10 (7), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijsia.2016.10.7.07
  4. Hashim, M, G., Kannan, K, N., Wegener, D, T. (2018). Central Role of Moral Obligations in Determining Intentions to E ngage in Digital Piracy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35 (3), 934-963. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1481670
  5. Gorniak, K., (2007). From computer ethics to the ethics of global ICT society. Library HI Tech, 25(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830710735858
  6. Choi, M. (2016). A Concept Analysis of Digital Citizenship for Democratic Citiz enship Education in the Internet Age. Theory and Research in Social Education, 44 (4), 565-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1210549
  7. Huang, S., Huang, Y., Wu, T. (2016). Problem-based learning effectiveness on micro-blog and blog for students: a case study. Interactive Learning Environments, 24 (6). 1334-1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1004353
  8. 교육부 (2015). 실과(기술.가정)/정보과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호 별책 10. 교육부.
  9. 교육부 (2015). 도덕과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호 별책 6. 교육부.
  10. 민용성 (2011). 교과 내용의 적합성 준거 개발. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 11(3), 19-41.
  11. Bynum, T. (2018). Computer and Information Ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition). Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
  12. Wiener, N. (1950). The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; Second Edition Revised. NY: Doubleday Anchor 1954.
  13. Maner, W. (1980). Starter Kit in Computer Ethics, Hyde Park. NY: Helvetia Press and the National Information and Resource Center for Teaching Philosophy.
  14. Johnson, D. (1985). Computer Ethics. First Edition, Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  15. Moor, J. (1985). What Is Computer Ethics?. Metaphilosophy, 16 (4), 266-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00173.x
  16. 임상수 (2003). 정보윤리교육의 방법론 모색. 윤리연구, 54, 261-291.
  17. 김한성.정혜진.이원규 (2010). 정보교과의 정보윤리 교육내용에 대한 고찰. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 10(2), 95-119.
  18. 교육과학기술부 (2011). 실과(기술.가정) 교육과정. 교육과학기술부 고시 제 2011-361 호 별책10. 교육과학기술부.
  19. 교육과학기술부 (2011). 도덕과 교육과정. 교육과학기술부 고시 제 2011-361호 [별책 6]. 교육과학기술부.
  20. 백영민 (2017). R를 이용한 텍스트 마이닝. 경기도 : 한울아카데미.
  21. Gotterbarn, D. (2001). Informatics and Professional Responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics. 7 (2). 221-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-001-0043-5
  22. Ferguson, S., Thornley, C., Gibb, F. (2016). Beyond Codes of Ethics: How Library and Information Professionals Navigate Ethical Dilemmas in A Complex and Dynamic Information Environment. International Journal of Information Management. 36 (4), 543-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.02.012
  23. Namlu, A, G., Odabasi, H. F. (2007). Unethical Computer Using Behavior Scale: A Study of Reliability and Validity on Turk ish University Students. Computers & Education, 48 (2), 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.006
  24. Bussey, K., Fitzpatric, S., Raman, A. (2015). The Role of Moral Disengagement and Self-Efficacy in Cyber bullying. Journal of School Violence, 14 (1), 30-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.954045
  25. Wang, X., Yang, L., Yang, J. (2017). Trait Anger and Cyberbullying among You ng Adults: A Moderated Mediation Model of Moral Disengagement and Moral Identity. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 519-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.073
  26. Flores, Y., Nadia, Y., Vidales, G., Plemons, A. (2011). The Latino Cyber-Moral Panic Process in the United States. Information Communication & Society, 14 (4), 568-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.562222
  27. Mittelstadt, B. (2016). Auditing for Transparency in Content Personalization Systems. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4991-5002.
  28. Seyvanizad, J., Kashkuli, M. H. (2017). General Principles of International Law concerning Law of Media. Helix, 7 (4), 1606-1613.
  29. Wolf, M., Fresco, N. (2016). Ethics of the Software Vulnerabilities and Exploits Market. Information Society, 32 (4), 269-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2016.1177764
  30. Vanacker, B., Heider, D. (2012). Ethical Harm in Virtual Communities convergence. The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 18 (1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856511419916
  31. Rehg, W. (2015). Discourse Ethics for Computer Ethics: a Heuristic for Engaged Dialogical Reflection. Ethics and Information Technology, 17 (1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9359-0
  32. Healey, K., Stephens, N. (2017). Augmenting justice: Google glass, body ca meras, and the Politics of Wearable Technology. Journal of Information Communication & Ethics in Society, 15 (4), 370-384. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-04-2016-0010
  33. Liu, C. J., Yang, S. C. (2012). Applying the Practical Inquiry Model to Investigate the Quality of Students' Online Discourse in an Information Ethics Course Based on Bloom's Teaching Goal and Bird's 3C model. Computers & Education, 59 (2), 466-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.018
  34. Tang, J., Fam, C. (2005). The Effect of Interpersonal Influence on Softlifting Intention and Behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 56 (2), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-2170-9
  35. Akbulut, Y., Donmez, O. (2018). Predictors of Digital Piracy among Turkish Undergra duate Students. Telematics and Informatics, 35 (5), 1324-1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.004
  36. Powers, T. M. (2013). On the Moral Agency of Computers. An International Review of Philosophy, 32 (2), 227-236.
  37. Vassilis, G. (2016). Singularitarianism and Schizophrenia. AI & Society, 32 (4), 573-590.
  38. Floridi, L. (2016). Faultless Responsibility: on the Nature and Allocation of Moral Responsibility for Distributed Moral Actions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society : Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374 (2083), 20160112. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0112
  39. IEEE (2019). Ethically Aligned Design : A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems, First Edition. IEEE.
  40. ACM (2018), ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. ACM.

Cited by

  1. 인공지능의 이해와 사회적 영향력에 관한 교육 프로그램 개발 및 적용 vol.23, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2020.23.2.003