DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Necessity of Floor Design and Management Guideline for Group Housing Sows

모돈의 동물복지형 바닥 기준 설정 연구의 필요

  • Yang, Ka Young (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Jeon, Jung Hwan (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kwon, Kyeong Seok (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Jong Bok (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Ha, Jae Jung (Gyeongsngbuk-Do Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Jun Yeob (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • 양가영 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 전중환 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 권경석 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김종복 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 하재정 (경상북도 축산기술연구소) ;
  • 이준엽 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원)
  • Received : 2019.05.28
  • Accepted : 2019.08.02
  • Published : 2019.08.31

Abstract

Korea is introducing new animal welfare rearing standards for swine farmers in order to improve the breeding environment of livestock on Korean farms, Korea is establishing a policy to apply to all new farms in 2019 and to all existing farms in 2025. These guidelines are limiting stall breeding of sows after 4 weeks of pregnancy, the light intensity should be above 40lux, the ammonia level should be below 25ppm and the breeding density area should be increased from $1.4m^2$ to $2.25m^2$. In Europe, where animal welfare has been studied and applied for nearly 100 years, the facility specifications and management manuals are available and provided to farmers to introduce proper animal welfare for pigs and to enhance the convenience and utility of farmers who are converting to raising pigs. The EU has established independent standards for each country, and the EU has set the standards for floor facilities to improve animal welfare on pig farms and as applied by farmers. Yet in Korea, there are no methods and techniques for breeding methods that do not use an ordinary stall, except on a few leading farms. There has been no research on the welfare of sows so that farmer could improve sows' living conditions. Thus, farmers can minimize the difficulty of implementing the changing government policies, and they must develop farm turnover policies and specification management manuals to cope with the introduced regulations on sow group housing. We suggest that conducting research and evaluating the level of sows' welfare are important for farmers.

우리나라는 축산농가의 사육환경 개선을 위해 양돈 농가를 대상으로 새로운 동물복지형 사육기준을 도입하여 신규농가는 2019년, 기존농가는 2025년부터 적용 예정인 정책을 수립 중에 있다. 이는 임신 4주 이후 임신돈 스톨 사육을 제한하며, 조도는 40Lux이상, 암모니아 25ppm이하, 임신돈 사육밀도를 기존 $1.4m^2$에서 $2.25m^2$ 등으로 기준이 강화될 것이다. 동물복지를 100년 가까이 연구하여 적용하는 유럽의 경우, 동물복지형 양돈 도입을 위해 농가에서 활용할 수 있는 시설 및 사양관리 매뉴얼을 제공하여 전환 농가의 편이성 및 활용성을 높이고 있다. EU 자체 및 EU 내 국가별 독립적인 기준을 설정하여 돈사 내 동물복지 개선을 위한 바닥시설 기준을 정하여 농가에 적용하고 있는 실정이다. 하지만 국내의 경우 일부 선도 농가를 제외하고는 일반스톨을 사용하지 않는 사육방식에 대한 방법 및 기술이 전무한 상태이고, 사육면적 외의 모돈의 복지에 가장 크게 영향을 미치는 돈사바닥에 대한 복지수준에 대한 연구결과도 없는 실정이다. 따라서, 정부는 모돈 군사사육 정책변화에 대응 할 수 있으며, 농가의 어려움에 대한 최소화 및 활용 가능한 연구들이 필요하다. 즉, 농가의 시설전환 및 사양관리 매뉴얼 개발과, 동물복지 수준향상을 위한 모돈사 바닥에 대한 연구 및 모돈의 복지수준에 대한 평가 방법들에 대한 연구가 요구된다고 제언하는 바이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Word Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). Introduction to the recommendations for animal welfare. In Terrestrial animal health code. [Internet] Paris: World Organisation for Animal Health. c2017 [cited 2017 Jan 10], Available From: http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahc/current/chapitre_aw_introduction.pdf. (accessed Apr. 26, 2019)
  2. Animal protection management system. Farm animal [Internet] Google: Animal protection management system, c2011 [cited 2011 May 19], Available From: http://www.animal.go.kr/portal_rnl/farm_ani/certify_info.jsp. (accessed Apr. 30, 2019)
  3. B. J. Woo, D. Heo, H. J. Kim. A study on farm animal welfare and policy road-map for Korea, Research Report, Korea rural Economic Institute (KREI), Korea, pp.1-10.
  4. Welfare Quality(R), Welfare Quality(R) assessment protocol for pigs, Welfare Quality Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands Publishers, 2009. p.13-60.
  5. RSPCA, 2016 RSPCA, 2016. RSPCA Welfare Standards for Pigs. [Internet] Google: RSPCA Welfare Standards for Pigs, c2016 [cited 2016 Nov.], Available From: https://www.berspcaassured.org.uk/media/1171/rspca -standards-for-pigs-2016.pdf. (accessed Jun. 27, 2019)
  6. AHA, 2016 American Humane Association Animal Welfare Policy and Position Statements. [Internet] Google: American Humane Association Animal Welfare Policy and Position Statements, c2016 [cited 2016 Aug.], Available From: https://www.americanhumane.org/app/uploads/2016/08/animal-position.pdf. (accessed Jun. 27, 2019)
  7. J. H. Jeon, K. S. Hong, K. S. Kwon, J. Y. Leem J. B. Kim, K. Y. Yang, "Comparison of Animal Welfare Standards for Pigs", Proc. of 2019 Joint Congress of Korean Societies for Animal Science, Vol.2, No.1 pp. 581, Jun, 2019.
  8. S. J. Park, Effects of housing type of group or individual stall on reproductive performance and occurrence rate of accident ion sows, Master's thesis, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea, pp 12-13, 2017.
  9. G. M. Cronin, G. J. Simpson, P. H. Hemsworth, "The effects of the gestation and farrowing environments on sow and piglet behaviour and piglet survival and growth in early lactation", Applied Animal behaviour Science, Vol. 46, pp.175-195, Nov. 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)00657-5
  10. D. H. Kim, J. Y. Park, J. H. Woo, "Effects of Gestation Housing and Parity on the Farrowing Performance and Behaviour of Sows during the Pregnancy, Farrowing and Lactation", Journal of Animal Science & Technology, Vol.45, No.6 pp.1067-1078, Jan. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2003.45.6.1067
  11. J. Marchant, D. M. Nv Broom, S. Coming, "The influence of sow behaviour on piglet mortality due to crushing in an open farrowing system", Animal Science, Vol.72, pp.19-28, Feb. 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S135772980005551X
  12. L. A. Boyle, F. C. Leonard, P. B. Lynch, P. Brophy, "Influence of housing system during gestation on the behaviour and welfare of gilts in farrowing crates", Animal Science, Vol.71, pp.561-570, Dec. 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800055302
  13. M. J. Harris, H. W. Gonyou, "Increasing available space in a farrowing crate does not facilitate postural changes or maternal responses in gilts", Applied Animal behaviour Science, Vol. 59, pp.285-296, Sep. 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00142-7
  14. EUR-Lex. Summaries of EU Legislation, Protection of pig [Internet]. Eur-Lex, c2008 [cited 208 Jun 11], Available From: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM%3Asa0009 (accessed May. 19, 2019)
  15. Y. H. Yoo, J. I. Song, H. C. Shoi, J. H. Kim, K. H, Park, H. S. Kang. "Development of the Automatic Feeder for Growing-finishing", Journal of livestock housing and environment, Vol.15. No.3, pp.241-250, Dec. 2009. DOI: http://www.ndsl.kr/ndsl/commons/
  16. S. B. Jung, Study on the current situation of domestic and foreign policies for animal welfare, Master's thesis, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea, pp.57, 2010.
  17. T. H. Park, Effect of parity and lactation stage on behaviour of farrowing sows and suckling piglets, Master's thesis, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology, Jin-Ju, Korea, pp.31, 2019.
  18. D. H. Kim, D. M. Ha, "Comparison of Farrowing Sow and Piglet Vocalizations Between Welfare Certified Farm and Conventional Pig Farm", Annals of animal resources sciences, Vol.29 No.2, pp.77-84, Jun. 2018. DOI: https://www.earticle.net/Article/A333340 https://doi.org/10.12718/AARS.2018.29.2.77
  19. K. W. Kang, Y. H. Choi, K. H. Kim, Y. Y. Kim,, "Animal Behavior and Welfare : The Comparison of the Behavior between Miniature Pigs and Conventional Sows during Gestation to Lactation Period", Journal of Animal Science and Technology, Vol.52 No.1, pp.57-64, Feb. 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2010.52.1.057
  20. B. I. Kim, Survey on claw lesions of sows in Korea, Master's thesis, Kawgwon National University, Gang-Won, Korea, pp.34, 2013.
  21. J. Y. Park, Effects of gestation housing on the farrowing performance and the behaviour of sows during pregnancy, farrowing and lactation, Master's thesis, Chinju National University, Jin-Ju, Korea, pp.42, 2003.
  22. J. C. Jang, Influence of Animal Welfare Management System in Swine on Physiological Responses and Reproductive Performance, Ph.D dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, pp.129, 2016.
  23. J. Y. Lee, J. H. Jeon, K. H. Park, J. I. Song, "The Effects of different farrowing space on lactating sow performances and growth performances of piglets", Journal of livestock housing and environment Vol.18 No.3, pp.157-164, Dec. 2012. DOI: http://www.ndsl.kr/ndsl/commons/util/