한국산학기술학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)

  • 제20권8호
  • /
  • Pages.122-132
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1975-4701(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4688(eISSN)
한국산학기술학회 (The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

제품의 속성별 선호역전에 따른 소비자의 선택변화 영향 연구 : 의료서비스 상품과 일반 제조품 비교 중심으로

A Study on the Influence of Consumer Choice on the Preference Reversals by Product Attribute : Focusing on Comparison of Medical Service Products and General Products

  • Han, Yong-Jun (Department of Business Administration, KyungHee University) ;
  • Jo, Seong-Chan (Department of Business Administration, KyungHee University)
  • 투고 : 2019.05.21
  • 심사 : 2019.08.02
  • 발행 : 2019.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 상품 특성 및 상황에 따른 선호역전 현상이 선택에 어떠한 영향을 미치는 지를 규명하여 소비자 의사결정 논리체계를 살펴보고, 선택변화에 영향을 미치는 변인들을 규명하여 효과적인 의사결정 및 마케팅 전략을 수립하는데 목적이 있다. 본 연구의 목적인 소비자 선호역전과 선택변화 간의 영향관계를 확인하기 위해 3가지의 연구문제를 설정하였으며, 범주형 종속변수를 고려하여 다항로지스틱 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 의료서비스 상품과 일반 제조품의 선호도 감소가 선택변화 및 선택연기에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것을 확인함으로써 연구문제 1을 해결하였다. 그리고 의료서비스 상품에서 속성의 중요도에 따른 선택변화가 일반 제조품에 비해 더욱 민감하게 작용한 반면, 선호역전에 따른 선택변화가 일반 제조품에서 더욱 높게 나타남을 확인하였다. 본 연구는 기존의 선호 및 선호역전 연구와는 다른 관점에서 소비자의 중심가치로서의 선호 개념을 조명하여 선택 간의 인과관계를 확인하였으며, 선호역전에 따른 선택변화 뿐만 아니라 선택연기와 같은 다른 대안까지 포함할 수 있음을 연구결과로 제시함에 따라 그에 따른 이론 실무적 시사점을 제공하는 데 의의가 있다.

This study investigated the effects of preference reversal according to product characteristics and situation. To investigate the relationship between consumer preference reversal and selection change, three research problems were set up and multiple logistic regression analysis was performed considering categorical dependent variables. The results showed that the decrease in preference for the medical service products and general manufacturing products had a significant effect on selection change and selection delay. In addition, we found that selection change according to the importance of attributes in the medical service product was more sensitive than the general product, while selection change according to the preference reversal was higher in general products. This study examined the causal relationship between choices by illuminating the preference concept as the central value of consumers from a different viewpoint than the existing preference and preference inversion research. In addition, the results of this study suggest that it can include not only selective change according to preference reversal, but also alternatives such as selective delay.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. H. H. Ha, S. W. Ahn, Y. W. Ha. "The Effects of Choice Set Size and Composition on Preference for a No-choice Option", Korea Business Review, Vol.31, No.1, pp.95-113. 2002.
  2. S. Hoeffler, D. Ariely, P. West, R. Duclos. "Preference exploration and learning: the role of intensiveness and extensiveness of experience", Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol.23, No.3, pp.330-340, 2013. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.10.007
  3. A. Fagerstrom, J. P. Stratton, G. R. Foxall. "The impact of corporate social responsibility activities on the consumer purchasing situation" Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, Vol.35, No.3-4, pp.184-205, 2015. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2015.1093053
  4. S. M. Broniarczyk, J. G. Griffin. "Decision difficulty in the age of consumer empowerment" Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol.24, No.4, pp.608-625, 2014. DOI :https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.003
  5. S. Lichtenstein, P. Slovic. "Reversal of Preferences between Bias and Choices in Gambling Decisions", Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vo.89, pp.46-55, 1971. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0031207
  6. Y. W. Ha, S. W. Ahn, H. K. Ahn, J. H. Lee. "Preference Reversals in Evaluation Tasks: The Moderating Role of Attribute Familiarity and? Attribute-Value Range Information", Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol.14, No.1, pp.159-177, 2003.
  7. D. Kahneman, A. Tversky, Choices, values, and frames. In Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making: Part I. p. 269-278, World Scientific. 2013. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417358_0016
  8. J. S. Wang, Y. F. Cheng, Y. L. Chu. "Effect of celebrity endorsements on consumer purchase intentions: advertising effect and advertising appeal as mediators" Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, Vol.23, No.5, pp.357-367, 2013. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20336
  9. Q. Wang, P. Shukla. "Linking sources of consumer confusion to decision satisfaction: the role of choice goals" Psychology & Marketing, Vol.30, No.4, pp.295-304, 2013. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20606
  10. A. Tversky, S. Sattath, P. Slovic. "Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice", Psychological review, Vol.95, No.3, pp.371-384. 1988. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.371
  11. S. M. Nowlis, I. Simonson. "Attribute-Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Consumer Preference Reversals" Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.34, No.2, pp.205-218. 1997. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151859
  12. J. R. Hauser, S. Dong, M. Ding. "Self-Reflection and Articulated Consumer Preferences" Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.31, No.1, pp.17-32, 2014. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12077
  13. F. R. Kardes. "Selective versus comparative processing" Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol.23, No.1, pp.150-153, 2013. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.10.003
  14. C. K. Hsee. "The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals Between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.67, No.3, pp.247-257. 1996. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0077
  15. T. Y. Kim, J. Y. Lee. "The Effects of Self Regulatory Resource Depletion and Decision Modes on Products Evaluations and Choices", Journal Of Korean Marketing Association, Vol.32, No.2, pp.55-80. 2017. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.15830/kmr.2017.32.2.55
  16. H. A. Simon. "A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice", Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol69, No.99-128, 1955. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1884852
  17. J. Y. Lee. "An Overview of Behavioral Decision Theory (BDT) in Consumer Behavior : Focusing on 2000-2009 Korean Studies", Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol.21, No.2, pp.193-236. 2010.
  18. R. H. Thaler. "Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice", Marketing Science, Vol.4, No.3, pp.199-214. 1985. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199
  19. D. Kahneman, D. A. Tversky, A. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk", Econometirca, Vo.47, No.2, pp.263-291. 1979. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  20. R. Dhar. "Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option", Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.24, No.2, pp.215-231, 1997. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209506
  21. M F. Luce. "Choosing to Avoid: Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions", Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.24, No.4, pp.409-432. 1998. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209518
  22. R. Dhar, S. J. Sherman. "The Effect of Common and Unique Features on Consumer Choice", Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.23, No.3, pp.193-203. 1996. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209477
  23. D. Zakay, Y. Tsal. "The impact of using forced decision-making strategies on post-decisional confidence", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol.6, No.1, pp.53-68. 1993. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960060104
  24. R. Dhar, S. Nowlis. "The Effect of Time Pressure on Consumer Choice Deferral", Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25, No.25. pp.369-348. 1999. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209545
  25. H. H. Ha, J. S. Hyun. "The Effect of the Number of Alternatives and Presentation Format on Purchase Decision", The Korean Journal Of Consumer And Advertising Psychology, Vol.5, No.2, pp.29-47. 2004.
  26. M. H. Bazerman, G. H. Lowenstein, S. B. White. "Reversals of Preference in Allocation Decisions: Judging an Alternative versus Choosing among Alternatives", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.37, No.. pp.220-240, 1992. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393222
  27. Y. W. Ha, S. Y. Choi. "Consumer Preference Reversals between Present and Future Gains", Sogang Journal of Business, Vol.19, No.2, pp.185-204. 2008.
  28. V. H. M. Visschers, P. M. Wiedemann, H. Gutscher, S. Kurzenhauser, R. Seidl, C. G. Jardine, D. R. M. Timmermans, D. R. M. "Affect-inducing risk communication: current knowledge and future directions" Journal of Risk Research, Vol.15, No.3, pp.257-271, 2012. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.634521
  29. Y. J. Jang, J. H. Yang, "The Effect of Attribute Evaluability on Preference Reversals", The Journal of Professional Management, Vol.20, No.4, pp.221-238, 2017.
  30. W .H. Desvousges, M. C. Naughton, G. R. Parsons. "Benefit Transfer: Conceptual Problems in Estimating Water Quality Benefits Using Existing Studies", Water resources research, Vol.28, No.3, pp.675-683. 1992. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/91WR02592
  31. R. A. Peterson, S. Balasubramanian., B. J. Bronnenberg. "Exploring the Implications of the Internet for Consumer Marketing", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.25, No.4, pp.329-346, 1997. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092070397254005
  32. M. Y. Jeon, N. D. Kim. "Do experiences make people happier than material possessions?", Consumer Policy and Education Review, Vol.7, No.2, pp.55-75, 2011.