한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)

  • 제38권3호
  • /
  • Pages.395-405
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1598-3099(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8436(eISSN)
한국초등과학교육학회 (The Korean Elementary Science Education Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

초등학생의 창의적 과학문제해결과정 분석

Analysis of Creative Science Problem Solving Process of Elementary School Students

  • 투고 : 2019.07.31
  • 심사 : 2019.08.23
  • 발행 : 2019.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze the process of creative science problem solving (CSPS) in elementary school students. To do this, 6 graders (n=9) at a elementary school in Seoul were participated. In this study, fixed eye-tracker with 250 Hz sampling and observation camera were used. The results of this study, the students with higher ability to solve creative science problems had a slower saccade, and had more visual attention on core clues and a greater number of eye changes. Therefore, students with higher ability to solve creative science problems showed more effective eye movement and faster information processing to solve problems. The CSPS types of elementary students were classified as 'declarative knowledge type', 'procedural knowledge type', 'conditional knowledge type', 'knowledge lack type'. Because each type appears to be complementary, CSPS process for elementary students who have integrated the four types was devised. The results of this study can be used as basic data for understanding elementary school students' CSPS and will help to develop and guide creative science teaching and learning programs useful to elementary school students and science gifted students.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
  2. Basaraba, D., Zannou, Y., Woods, D. & Ketterlin-Geller, L. (2013). Exploring the utility of student-think alouds for providing insights into students' metacognitive and problem-solving processes during assessment development. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1-11.
  3. Choi, H. D., Shin, W. S. & Shin, D. H. (2012). Differences in eye movement patterns in the classification process of elementary science gifted and normal children. Elementary Science Education, 31(4), 501-512.
  4. Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Shulman, G. L. & Petersen, S. E. (1993). Attention modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. Science, 248, 1556-1559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2360050
  5. Corbetta, M., Shulman, G. L., Miezin, F. M. & Petersen, S. E. (1995). Superior cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction. Science, 270, 802-805. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5237.802
  6. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
  7. Holyoak, K. J. & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. US: MIT Press.
  8. Isaksen, S. G. (1994). Versions of CPS. Buffalo. NY: Cencer for Studies in Creativity, Buffalo State Colleage.
  9. Jung, J. J. (2015). Principles and practices of brain-based learning. Seoul: Governor.
  10. Kwon, M. J. & Cho, S. H. (2014). An analysis of the relationship between the scientifically gifted brain utilization and scientific creative problem solving ability. Gifted Education Research, 24(6), 961-974.
  11. Kim, J. S. & Jang, S. H. (2017). Analysis of visualization activities in the process of creative science problem solving for elementary school students. Elementary Science Education, 36(1), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.1.073
  12. Kim, Y. J., Kim, J. Y. & Kwon, C. S. (2005). Differences in EEG activity between elementary science gifted students and normal children. Biology Education, 33(1), 23-32.
  13. Lee, G. N. & Shin, J. H. (2019). The effect of barefoot experience program on EEG and brain utilization of elementary school students. Learner Centered Curriculum Education Research, 19, 219-238.
  14. Lee, S. J., Bae, J. H. & Kim, E. J. (2007). Types and characteristics of thinking in scientific creative problem solving of elementary science gifted children and ordinary children. Elementary Science Education, 25(5), 567-581.
  15. Lim, C. S. (2012). Development of a creative scientific problem solving instruction model based on a brainbased evolutionary approach. Biology Education, 40(4), 429-452. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.4.429
  16. Lim, C. S. (2014). Develop and apply scientific creativity assessment formulas. Elementary Science Education, 33(2), 242-257. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.2.242
  17. Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850
  18. Ministry of Education (2015). Revised primary school science curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice 2015-74.
  19. Muller, H. J. & Krummenacher, J. (2006). Visual search and selective attention. Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), 389-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500527676
  20. Mumford, M. D., Marks, M. A., Connelly, M. S., Zaccaro, S. J. & Johnson, J. F. (1998). Domain-based scoring in divergent-thinking tests: Validation evidence in an occupational sample. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1102_5
  21. Navalpakkam, V. & Itti, L. (2002) A goal oriented attention guidance model. Biologically Motivated Computer Vision Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 25, 453-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36181-2_45
  22. Shim, H. J. & Jang, S. H. (2007). A case study of the creative science problem solving process of science gifted children and ordinary children. Elementary Science Education, 25(5), 532-547.
  23. Shin, D. H. & Kwon, Y. J. (2007). A review of brain research methods in elementary science educationfocusing on fMRI utilization. Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 49-62.
  24. Shin, W. S. (2016). A study of eye tracking method in elementary science education research. Elementary Science Education, 35(3), 288-304. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.3.288
  25. Shin, W. S. & Shin, D. H. (2013a). Analysis of eye movement according to science achievement of elementary school students in observation problems. Elementary Science Education, 32(2), 185-197.
  26. Shin, W. S. & Shin, D. H. (2013b). Development of heuristic attention model by analyzing eye movements of elementary school students in discrimination task. Korean Journal of Science Education, 33(7), 1471-1485.
  27. Shin, W. S. & Shin, D. H. (2016). Analysis of attention characteristics of elementary school students through eye tracking and attention test in science class. Korean Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 705-715.
  28. Slykhuis, D. A., Wiebe, E. N. & Annetta, L. A. (2005). Eye-tracking students’ attention to powerpoint photographs in science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(6), 509-520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-0225-z
  29. Snowden, R., Thompson, P. & Troscianko, T. (2011). Basic vision: An introduction to visual perception. translated by Oh, S. J. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  30. Torrance, E. P. (1998). The torrance tests of creative thinking norms - Technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
  31. You, T. S. & Jeon, Y. S. (2017). A case study on the creative problem solving process of the elementary school students. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 28, 53-69. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.28..201705.53