Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on online survey user experience -Focused on Google and Naver form-

온라인 설문조사 사용자 경험 연구 -구글과 네이버 폼을 중심으로-

  • Hwangbo, Yeon (Digital Media Design, HongIk University, International Design School for Advanced Studies) ;
  • Kim, Seung-In (Digital Media Design, HongIk University, International Design School for Advanced Studies)
  • 황보연 (홍익대학교 국제디자인전문대학원 디지털미디어디자인 전공) ;
  • 김승인 (홍익대학교 국제디자인전문대학원 디지털미디어디자인 전공)
  • Received : 2019.05.22
  • Accepted : 2019.08.20
  • Published : 2019.08.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is an online survey user experience study. The purpose of this research is user experience research to make use and development of online surveys. In-depth interviews were conducted with 8 native Koreans who were not experienced with Naver and Google, and were surveyed using Peter Morville's Honeycomb model. In addition, we performed evaluation through tasks and think-aloud. Naver is highly useful, usable, desirable and findable, and Google can confirm its superior accessible and flexible. Research has shown that improvements in usability and ease of functioning are needed by reclassifying and moving menu categories. Online survey user experience that has not been studied previously can predict the direction of usability improvement and can help the user side. We hope that this research will improve the usability of online surveys, and will lead to various related research.

본 연구는 온라인 설문조사 사용자 경험 연구이다. 온라인 설문조사의 활용과 발전을 위해 사용자 측면의 연구를 하는 것에 목적이 있다. 연구 방법으로는 네이버와 구글의 사용 경험이 없는 피험자 8명을 대상으로 사용자 경험에 영향을 미치는 요인을 태스크를 통한 수행 평가, 씽크얼라우드, 피터 모빌의 허니콤 모형을 이용한 설문, 심층 인터뷰를 통해 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 네이버는 유용성, 사용성, 매력성, 검색성이 높으며 구글은 접근성과 유연성이 우수하다는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 특히 인터페이스 메뉴 카테고리의 재분류와 이동으로 사용성을 높이고 기능을 쉽게 찾기 위한 개선안이 필요하다는 시사점을 도출했다. 본 연구는 기존에 연구되지 않았던 온라인 설문조사 사용자 경험으로 사용성 개선의 방향을 예측하고 사용자 측면에 도움을 줄 수 있다. 본 연구를 바탕으로 추후 온라인 설문조사의 사용성이 개선되고, 다양한 관련 연구가 진행될 것을 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. H. W. Tak, K. K. Ko & D. W. Jung. (2019). Does the Choice of a Survey Method Affect Results?: A Comparison of TAPI and PAPI Methods. Korean Journal of Public Administration, 57(1), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.24145/KJPA.57.1.4
  2. S. Y. Lee & M. G. Park. (2018). A Study on the Error of Questionnaire Measurement in Online Survey. Master dissertation. Korea University Seoul, 1-33.
  3. B. S. Paik. (2019). Revised mobile survey open survey. Zdnet Korea. https://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LS2D&mid=shm&sid1=105&sid2=226&oid=092&aid=0002155339
  4. E. Y. Kim, J. W. Kim, H. J. Jang & J. B. Shin. (2018). Implementation of Block Chain based Survey Platform utilizing Ethereum Smart Contract. Korea Information Science Society, 2018(12), 2182-2184.
  5. C. H. Jeon & H. K. Choi. (2006). Design and Implementation of a Respondent-Based Real-Time Survey System Using XML. Journal of Internet Computing and Services (JICS), 7(2), 53-69.
  6. Z. G. Chen & L. W. Seo. (2011). Design and Implementation of an Online Survey System About Make and Development of the Game. Department of Game Multimedia Engineering Graduate School of Paichai University Daejeon, 1-67.
  7. J. Y. Lee & J. G. Kim. (2006). Comparing Data Qualities of On-Line Panel and Off-Line Interview Surveys: Reliability and Validity. Korean Marketing Association, 21(4), 209-231.
  8. D. H. Ye. (2012). The Effect of Green Practices on Brand Image, Brand Preference, and Revisit Intention in the Branded Coffee Store. Major in Hotel, Restaurant & Institutional Management The Graduate School of Human Environmental Sciences Yonsei University, 1-98.
  9. S. W. Jeon & W. H. Lee & J. H. Jung & J. J. Shim & S. J. Ko. (1998). Development of Internet Online Survey System. KOREA INFORMATION SCIENCE SOCIETY, 25(2), 403-405.
  10. J. J. Ryu. (2001). Internet Survey System Construction Status. Proceedings of Spring Conference, 2001(0), 141-156.
  11. E. L. Park. (2011). Survey provider SurveyMonkey to enter the Korean market in earnest. Etoday. http://www.etoday.co.kr/news/section/newsview.php? TM=news&SM=0605&idxno=491022
  12. T. Y. Kim. (2008). Google adds information gathering capabilities to word processors. Bloter. http://www.bloter.net/archives/3528
  13. B. J. Kim. (2013). Providing form function service to Naver Office. Etoday. http://www.etoday.co.kr/news/section/newsview.php? idxno=689982
  14. H. J. Uhm. (2013). Noteworthy Cloud Office. SegyeNews. http://www.segye.com/newsView/20131104004932?O utUrl=naver
  15. J. H. Jo & S. I. Kim. (2019). Evaluation of Usability on Application -. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(5), 327-332. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.5.327
  16. J. Y. Lee & S. I. Kim. (2015). Webtoon Application's User Experience Study - Focused on the Naver, the Daum and the LezhinComics -. Journal of Digital Design, 15(3), 759-768. https://doi.org/10.17280/jdd.2015.15.3.072