디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제17권8호
  • /
  • Pages.187-196
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

문화·예술 산업의 변혁적 리더십과 집단효능감 간의 관계에 관한 연구 - 직무의미성의 매개효과 -

A Study on the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Collective Efficacy in Culture and Art Industry - Mediating effect of job meaning -

  • 이선규 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 김은경 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 송찬섭 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 배정미 (금오공과대학교 경영학과)
  • Lee, Sun-Kyu (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Kyeong (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Song, Chan-sub (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Bae, Jeong-mi (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2019.05.31
  • 심사 : 2019.08.20
  • 발행 : 2019.08.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 문화 예술 산업의 조직이 타 조직과 비교하여 전통을 중시하고 예술적 가치에 큰 비중을 두는 특성에 초점을 두었다. 이러한 특징을 반영하여 산업의 발전과 경제적 가치 창출에 대한 방법을 제시하고자 변혁적 리더십과 직무의미성, 집단효능감의 관계를 실증분석하고, 효과를 밝히고자 한다. 이 관계를 밝히고자, 문헌 연구를 바탕으로 연구모형 및 가설을 설정하였고, 해당 산업 종사자를 대상으로 377부의 설문지를 배포 회수하여 실증분석을 시행하였다. 연구결과, 변혁적 리더십은 집단효능감에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것을 확인하였다. 그리고 변혁적 리더십이 직무의미성에 미치는 영향과 직무의미성이 집단효능감에 미치는 영향, 직무의미성의 매개 효과를 확인하였다. 이러한 연구결과는 문화 예술 산업에서 변혁적 리더십이 구성원들의 태도에 미치는 효과를 파악함으로써 조직 변화에 대한 가이드라인을 제공할 수 있을 것이다.

This study focuses on the characteristics of culture and art industry organizations that emphasize tradition and artistic values. The purpose is to investigate the relationship between transformational leadership, job meaning and collective efficacy, and to clarify the effect of this study. In order to clarify this relationship, research models and hypotheses were set up based on literature research, and 377 questionnaires were distributed and retrieved for the relevant industry workers. The results showed that transformational leadership had a significant effect on group efficacy. In addition, the influence of transformational leadership on job meaning, the effect of job meaning on collective efficacy, and the mediating effect of job semantics were confirmed. These findings can provide guidelines for organizational change by identifying the effects of transformational leadership on the attitudes of members in the culture and arts industry.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. H. S. Lee. (2011). A Study on the Recognition and Development Direction of Cultural Arts Workers on Linking Culture Arts and Contents Industry. Culture and Arts Management Studies, 4(2), 41-69.
  2. R. J. House. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 321-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391905
  3. J. A. Conger & R. N. Kanungo. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 637-647. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306715
  4. B. M. Bass. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Collier Macmillan.
  5. N. Tichy & M. Devanna. (1986). Transformational leadership. New York: Wiley.
  6. F. J. Yammarino & B. M. Bass. (1990). Transformational leadership and multiple levels of analysis. Human Relations, 43(10), 975-995. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679004301003
  7. B. M. Bass & B. J. Avolio. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Consulting Psychologists Press.
  8. A. Bandura. (1986). The Explanatory and Predictive Scope of Self-Efficacy Theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
  9. A. Bandura. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/SpringerReference_223312
  10. R. D. Goddard, W. K. Hoy & A. W. Hoy. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037002479
  11. G. P. Shea & R. A. Guzzo. (1987). Groups as human resources. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 5, 323-356.
  12. D. H. Lindsley, D. J. Brass & J. B. Thomas. (1995). Efficacy-Performing Spirals: A Multilevel Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 645-678. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080333
  13. C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen. (2003). Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness. Wiley.
  14. M. L. Riggs & P. A. Knight. (1994). The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: A causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 755. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.79.5.755
  15. S. M. Jex & D. M. Gudanowski. (1992). Efficacy beliefs and work stress: An exploratory study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(5), 509-517. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130506
  16. K. Whitney. (1994). Improving group task performance: The role of group goals and group efficacy. Human Performance, 7(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0701_5
  17. R. A. Guzzo, P. R. Yost, R. J. Campbell & G. P. Shea. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb00987.x
  18. G. E. Prussia & A. J. Kinicki. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.187
  19. J. J. Sosik, B. J. Avolio & S. S. Kahai. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.82.1.89
  20. P. C. Earley, (1993). Culture, self-identity, and work. Oxford University Press on Demand.
  21. D. L. Feltz & C. D. Lirgg. (1998). Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.557
  22. A. Bandura & D. H. Schunk. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 41(3), 586. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586
  23. B. Shamir, R. J. House & M. B. Arthur. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577-594. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.4.577
  24. J. R. Hackman & G. R. Oldham. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied psychology, 60(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076546
  25. L. Smircich & G. Morgan. (1982). Leadership: The management of meaning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18(3), 257-273. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638201800303
  26. E. Goffman. (1974). Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
  27. G. R. Salancik & J. Pfeffer. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative science quarterly, 224-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563
  28. J. E. Bono & T. A. Judge. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 554-571. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040649
  29. B. Bass & B. Avolio. (1995). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire. Mind Garden.
  30. J. R. Hackman & G. R. Oldham. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 250-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
  31. B. Han, Y. Cho, C. Song, E. Kim & S. Lee. (2018). A study of the relationship of Entrepreneurship, Absorptive capacity and Creative product. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(10), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.10.187
  32. C. Song, S. Lee, Y. Kim & E. Kang. (2016). A Study on the influence of Self-Efficacy to Goal Setting in the age of Convergence: Focusing on the Self-regulatory depletion and non-depletion group. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(3), 151-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.3.151