The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Wear resistance of indirect composite resins used for provisional restorations supported by implants

  • Received : 2019.05.22
  • Accepted : 2019.08.15
  • Published : 2019.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to investigate simulated localized and generalized wear of indirect composite resins used for implant supported provisional restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study investigated ten indirect composite resins. Two kinds of wear were simulated by 400,000 cycles in a Leinfelder-Suzuki (Alabama) machine. Localized wear was simulated with a stainless-steel ball bearing antagonist and generalized with a flat-ended stainless-steel cylinder antagonist. The tests were carried out in water slurry of polymethyl methacrylate beads. Wear was measured using a Proscan 2100 noncontact profilometer in conjunction with Proscan and AnSur 3D software. RESULTS. Both localized and generalized wear were significantly different (P<.05) among the indirect composite resins. SR Nexco and Gradia Plus showed significantly less wear than the other indirect composite resins. The rank order of wear was same in both types of wear simulation. CONCLUSION. Indirect composite resins are recommended when a provisional implant-supported restoration is required to function in place over a long period. Although only some indirect composite resins showed similar wear resistance to CAD/CAM composite resins, the wear resistance of all the indirect composite resins was higher than that of bis-acryl base provisional and polymethyl methacrylate resins.

Keywords

References

  1. Pjetursson BE, Asgeirsson AG, Zwahlen M, Sailer I. Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:308-24. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g5.2
  2. Slagter KW, den Hartog L, Bakker NA, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Immediate placement of dental implants in the esthetic zone: a systematic review and pooled analysis. J Periodontol 2014;85:e241-50. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.130632
  3. Hartlev J, Kohberg P, Ahlmann S, Andersen NT, Schou S, Isidor F. Patient satisfaction and esthetic outcome after immediate placement and provisionalization of single-tooth implants involving a definitive individual abutment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1245-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12260
  4. Yan Q, Xiao LQ, Su MY, Mei Y, Shi B. Soft and hard tissue changes following immediate placement or immediate restoration of single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:1327-40. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4668
  5. Bishti S, Strub JR, Att W. Effect of the implant-abutment interface on peri-implant tissues: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 2014;72:13-25. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2013.799712
  6. Chen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxillaa systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:186-215. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.3
  7. Weigl P, Strangio A. The impact of immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants on hard and soft tissues in the anterior maxilla. Eur J Oral Implantol 2016;9:S89-106.
  8. Santing HJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Werner A, Feilzer AJ, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ. Occlusal wear of provisional implant-supported restorations. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:179-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12072
  9. Tarnow DP, Eskow RN. Preservation of implant esthetics: soft tissue and restorative considerations. J Esthet Dent 1996;8:12-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1996.tb00904.x
  10. Chee WW. Provisional restorations in soft tissue management around dental implants. Periodontol 2000 2001;27:139-47. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0757.2001.027001139.x
  11. Belser UC, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Taylor TD. Prosthetic management of the partially dentate patient with fixed implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:126-45. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1126.x
  12. Burns DR, Beck DA, Nelson SK; Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:474-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00259-2
  13. Castellon P, Casadaban M, Block MS. Techniques to facilitate provisionalization of implant restorations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:72-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.152
  14. Shibasaki S, Takamizawa T, Suzuki T, Nojiri K, Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of different curing modes on polymerization behavior and mechanical properties of dual-cured provisional resins. Oper Dent 2017;42:526-36. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-335-L
  15. Abdullah AO, Pollington S, Liu Y. Comparison between direct chairside and digitally fabricated temporary crowns. Dent Mater J 2018;37:957-63. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-315
  16. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Scheidel D, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Mechanical properties and simulated wear of provisional resin materials. Oper Dent 2015;40:603-13. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-132-L.1
  17. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Fischer NG, Nojiri K, Nagura Y, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miazaki M. Wear of resin composites: Current insights into underlying mechanisms, evaluation methods and influential factors. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2018;54:76-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2017.11.002
  18. ISO Standards. ISO14569 Dental materials - Guidance on testing of wear - Part 2: Wear by two- and/or three-body contact. ISO 2001;1:1-31.
  19. Leinfelder KF, Suzuki S. In vitro wear device for determining posterior composite wear. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:1347-53. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0406
  20. Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Erickson RL, Tsujimoto A, Latta M, Miyazaki M. Localized and generalized simulated wear of resin composites. Oper Dent 2015;40:322-35. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-155-L
  21. Heintze SD, Reichl FX, Hickel R. Wear of dental materials: Clinical significance and laboratory wear simulation methods A review. Dent Mater J 2019;38:343-53. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-140
  22. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of thermal stress on simulated localized and generalized wear of nanofilled resin composites. Oper Dent 2018;43:380-90. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-206-L
  23. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of thermal cycling on flexural properties and simulated wear of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing resin composites. Oper Dent 2017;42:101-10. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-046-L
  24. Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Erickson RL, Lambrechts P. Comparison of laboratory and clinical wear rates of resin composites. Quintessence Int 2004;35:269-74.

Cited by

  1. Effect of Antibacterial Silver-Releasing Filler on the Physicochemical Properties of Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Denture Base Material vol.12, pp.24, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244146
  2. Bonding and wear properties of self‐adhesive flowable restorative materials vol.129, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12799