The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제11권4호
  • /
  • Pages.223-231
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of indirect resin composite to resin matrix ceramics

  • Celik, Ersan (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University) ;
  • Sahin, Sezgi Cinel (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Pamukkale University) ;
  • Dede, Dogu Omur (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University)
  • 투고 : 2019.04.12
  • 심사 : 2019.08.09
  • 발행 : 2019.08.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of an indirect resin composite (IRC) to the various resin matrix ceramic (RMC) blocks using different surface treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Ninety-nine cubic RMC specimens consisting of a resin nanoceramic (RNC), a polymer-infiltrated hybrid ceramic (PIHC), and a flexible hybrid ceramic (FHC) were divided randomly into three surface treatment subgroups (n = 11). In the experimental groups, untreated (Cnt), tribochemical silica coating (Tbc), and Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) laser irradiation (Lsr) with 3 W (150 mJ/pulse, 20 Hz for 20 sec.) were used as surface treatments. An indirect composite resin (IRC) was layered with a disc-shape mold ($2{\times}3mm$) onto the treated-ceramic surfaces and the specimens submitted to thermal cycling (6000 cycles, $5-55^{\circ}C$). The SBS test of specimens was performed using a universal testing machine and the specimens were examined with a scanning electron microscope to determine the failure mode. Data were statistically analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD test (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. According to the two-way ANOVA, only the surface treatment parameter was statistically significant (P<.05) on the SBS of IRC to RMC. The SBS values of Lsr-applied RMC groups were significantly higher than Cnt groups for each RMC material, (P<.05). Significant differences were also determined between Tbc surface treatment applied and untreated (Cnt) PIHC materials (P=.039). CONCLUSION. For promoting a reliable bond strength during characterization of RMC with IRC, Nd:YAG laser or Tbc surface treatment technique should be used, putting in consideration the microstructure and composition of RMC materials and appropriate parameters for each material.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hickel R, Brushaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations-criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater 2013;29:28-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.006
  2. Filho AM, Vieira LC, Araujo E, Monteiro Junior S. Effect of different ceramic surface treatments on resin microtensile bond strength. J Prosthodont 2004;13:28-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04007.x
  3. Kumbuloglu O, User A, Toksavul S, Vallittu PK. Intra-oral adhesive systems for ceramic repairs: a comparison. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61:268-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350310005556
  4. Elsaka SE. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent Mater J 2015;34:161-7. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-159
  5. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014;93:1232-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514553976
  6. Alt V, Hannig M, Wostmann B, Balkenhol M. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dent Mater 2011;27:339-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.012
  7. Balkenhol M, Mautner MC, Ferger P, Wostmann B. Mechanical properties of provisional crown and bridge materials: chemicalcuring versus dual-curing systems. J Dent 2008;36:15-20.
  8. Goncu Basaran E, Ayna E, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Loadbearing capacity of handmade and computer-aided designcomputer- aided manufacturing-fabricated three-unit fixed dental prostheses of particulate filler composite. Acta Odontol Scand 2011;69:144-50. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2010.545034
  9. Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Trottmann A, Ozcan M, Fischer J, Hammerle CH. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1669-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0670-4
  10. Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hammerle CH. Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J 2012;31:377-83. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-238
  11. Barutcigil K, Barutcigil C, Kul E, Ozarslan MM, Buyukkaplan US. Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength of resin cement to a CAD/CAM restorative material. J Prosthodont 2019;28:71-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12574
  12. Stawarczyk B, Trottmann A, Hammerle CH, Ozcan M. Adhesion of veneering resins to polymethylmethacrylatebased CAD/CAM polymers after various surface conditioning methods. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71:1142-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.757354
  13. Stawarczyk B, Ozcan M, Trottmann A, Schmutz F, Roos M, Hammerle C. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:325-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60309-1
  14. Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Irie M, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Sandblasting may damage the surface of composite CAD-CAM blocks. Dent Mater 2017;33:e124-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.12.003
  15. Gungor MB, Nemli SK, Bal BT, Unver S, Dogan A. Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:259-66. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.259
  16. Kurbad A, Kurbad S. A new, hybrid material for minimally invasive restorations in clinical use. Int J Comput Dent 2013;16:69-79.
  17. Albero A, Pascual A, Camps I, Grau-Benitez M. Comparative characterization of a novel cad-cam polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network. J Clin Exp Dent 2015;7:e495-500.
  18. Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1141-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.006
  19. Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:587-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016
  20. Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:227-35. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4244
  21. Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, Chandrasekaran I, Johnston WM. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:71-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.014
  22. Duzyol M, Sagsoz O, Polat Sagsoz N, Akgul N, Yildiz M. The effect of surface treatments on the bond strength between CAD/CAM blocks and composite resin. J Prosthodont 2016;25:466-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12322
  23. Venezia P, Torsello F, Cavalcanti R, D'Amato S. Retrospective analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldspathic porcelain veneering limited to the facial surface. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:506-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.010
  24. Ikeda M, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Shear bond strengths of indirect resin composites to hybrid ceramic. Dent Mater J 2005;24:238-43. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.24.238
  25. Kobayashi K, Komine F, Blatz MB, Saito A, Koizumi H, Matsumura H. Influence of priming agents on the short-term bond strength of an indirect composite veneering material to zirconium dioxide ceramic. Quintessence Int 2009;40:545-51.
  26. Komine F, Kobayashi K, Saito A, Fushiki R, Koizumi H, Matsumura H. Shear bond strength between an indirect composite veneering material and zirconia ceramics after thermocycling. J Oral Sci 2009;51:629-34. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.51.629
  27. Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:382-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12100
  28. Honda MI, Florio FM, Basting RT. Effectiveness of indirect composite resin silanization evaluated by microtensile bond strength test. Am J Dent 2008;21:153-8.
  29. Blum IR, Hafiana K, Curtis A, Barbour ME, Attin T, Lynch CD, Jagger DC. The effect of surface conditioning on the bond strength of resin composite to amalgam. J Dent 2012;40:15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.10.019
  30. Addison O, Marquis PM, Fleming GJ. The impact of hydrofluoric acid surface treatments on the performance of a porcelain laminate restorative material. Dent Mater 2007;23:461-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.002
  31. Akyil MS, Yilmaz A, Bayindir F, Duymus ZY. Microtensile bond strength of resin cement to a feldspathic ceramic. Photomed Laser Surg 2011;29:197-203. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2009.2746
  32. Heikkinen TT, Lassila LV, Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Effect of operating air pressure on tribochemical silica-coating. Acta Odontol Scand 2007;65:241-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350701459753
  33. Gokce B, Ozpinar B, Dundar M, Comlekoglu E, Sen BH, Gungor MA. Bond strengths of all-ceramics: acid vs laser etching. Oper Dent 2007;32:173-8. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-52
  34. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, Iwasaki N, Asakawa Y, Oki M, Finger WJ, Arksornnukit M. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J 2014;33:705-10. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-208
  35. Yavuz T, Dilber E, Kara HB, Tuncdemir AR, Ozturk AN. Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems. Lasers Med Sci 2013;28:1233-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1201-5
  36. Kern M, Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss, morphology, and changes in the surface composition. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:453-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90182-1
  37. Kajdas CK. Importance of the triboemission process for tribochemical reaction. Trib Int 2005;38:337-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2004.08.017
  38. Tekce N, Tuncer S, Demirci M. The effect of sandblasting duration on the bond durability of dual-cure adhesive cement to CAD/CAM resin restoratives. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:211-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.211
  39. da Silva Ferreira S, Hanashiro FS, de Souza-Zaroni WC, Turbino ML, Youssef MN. Influence of aluminum oxide sandblasting associated with Nd:YAG or Er:YAG lasers on shear bond strength of a feldspathic ceramic to resin cements. Photomed Laser Surg 2010;28:471-5. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2009.2528
  40. Kursoglu P, Motro PF, Yurdaguven H. Shear bond strength of resin cement to an acid etched and a laser irradiated ceramic surface. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:98-103. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.98
  41. Kamel M, Ghallab O, Wahsh M. Assessment of ER, CR: YSGG laser surface treatment and self-adhesive resin cements formulae on microtensile bond strength to various CAD/CAM ceramic esthetic materials: an in vitro study. Egyptian Dent J 2018;64:1-14. https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2018.76349
  42. Cengiz-Yanardag E, Yilmaz SK, Karakaya I, Ongun S. Effect of different surface treatment methods on micro-shear bond strength of CAD-CAM restorative materials to resin cement. J Adhes Sci Technol 2019;33:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2018.1547483
  43. Matsumura H, Yanagida H, Tanoue N, Atsuta M, Shimoe S. Shear bond strength of resin composite veneering material to gold alloy with varying metal surface preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:315-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114823
  44. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Maltezos C, Blatz U, Mercante D, Burgess JO. In vitro durability of the resin bond to feldspathic ceramics. Am J Dent 2004;17:169-72.

피인용 문헌

  1. Repair bond strength and surface topography of resin‐ceramic and ceramic restorative blocks treated by laser and conventional surface treatments vol.84, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23672
  2. Metallization by Sputtering to Improve the Bond Strength between Zirconia Ceramics and Resin Cements vol.12, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb12040062