Asia-Pacific Journal of Business (아태비즈니스연구)

KNU The Institute of Management & Economy Research (강원대학교 경영경제연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Psychological Ownership and Innovative Behavior: Focus on Job Satisfaction and Job Engagement

심리적 주인의식과 혁신행동에 관한 연구: 직무만족과 직무열의를 중심으로

  • Received : 2018.11.30
  • Accepted : 2019.03.25
  • Published : 2019.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between psychological ownership and the innovative behavior of Korean employees. This paper also examined whether job satisfaction positively mediates the above relationship. In addition, we address the moderating role and moderated mediation role of job engagement in the relationship between job satisfaction and innovative behavior. By using cross-sectional data, with questionnaires administered to 289 employees working in Korean hospitals, the main hypotheses were tested. The result of empirical analysis has shown that psychological ownership was significantly positively related to both employee innovative behavior. The results also found that job satisfaction positively mediated the relationship between psychological ownership and innovative behavior of employees. In addition, there was significant moderating effect of job engagement on the relationship between psychological ownership and job satisfaction and the moderating mediating role of job engagement was found.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwon, In-Su and Young Keun Choi (2011), ʻA Study on the Antecedents of Job Engagement and Psychological Conditions as the Mediatorsʼ, Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 18(4), 113-133.
  2. Kim, Jae-Boong (2008), ʻThe Relationships of The ESOP, Psychological Ownership and Organizational Commitmentʼ, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 21(3), 913-934.ʼ
  3. Dang, Xiaohan and Soo-Jin Chung (2018), ʻThe Effect of Psychological Ownership on Job Satisfaction: the Mediator Effect of Organizational Trust and the Moderator Effect of Perceived Organizational Supportʼ, Management Education Research, 33, 201-223.
  4. Sim, Yoon-Hee and Tae-Yong Yoo (2009), ʻThe Influence of Person-Job fit on Job Engagement : Focus on Mediating of Meaning and Competenceʼ, Korean Journal of Industrial Psychology, 22(3), 399-420. https://doi.org/10.24230/ksiop.22.3.200908.399
  5. Cho, Young-Bohk and Na-Young Lee (2010), ʻA Study on The Effects of Psychological Ownership on Behavioral Support for Organizational Changeʼ, Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 17(2), 71-94.
  6. Lee, Na Young⋅Song, Kyoung-Soo Song, Jong Yeon An and Seung Min Kim (2016), ʻThe Influence of Psychological Ownership on Task Performance - The Mediating Effect of a Commitment to Change -ʼ, Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 23(4), 119-141. https://doi.org/10.14396/jhrmr.2016.23.4.119
  7. Jung, Hyun Woo (2015), ʻAn Empirical Study on the Structural Relationship Among Leader's Emotional Intelligence, Authenticity and Follower's Self Leadership, Innovative Behaviorʼ, Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 22(3), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.14396/jhrmr.2015.22.3.131
  8. Avey, J. B., B. J. Avolio, C. D. Crossley, and F. Luthans (2009), ʻPsychological Ownership: Theoretical Extensions, Measurement and Relation to Work Outcomes,ʼ Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), pp. 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.583
  9. Barney, J. B. (1991), ʻFirm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantageʼ, Journal of Business Management, 17, 99-120.
  10. Bharadwaj, S. and A. Menon (2000), ʻMaking Innovation Happen in Organizations: Individual Creativity Mechanisms, Organizational Creativity Mechanisms or Both?ʼ Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(6), 424-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1760424
  11. Bysted, R. (2013), ʻInnovative Employee Behavior: The Moderating Effects of Mental Involvement and Job Satisfaction on Contextual Variablesʼ European Journal of Innovation Management, 16, 268-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2011-0069
  12. Choi, S. B., K. Kim, and S. W. Kang (2017), ʻEffects of Transformational and Shared Leadership Styles on Employeesʼ Perception of Team Effectivenessʼ Social Behavior and Personality, 45(3), 377-386. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.5805
  13. Di Fan, Lin Cui, Mike Mingqiong Zhang, Cherrie Jiuhua Zhu, Charmine E.J. Hartel, and Chris Nyland. (2014), ʻInfluence of High Performance Work Systems on Employee Subjective Well-being and Job Burnout: Empirical Evidence from the Chinese Healthcare Sectorʼ, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(7): 931-950. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.876740
  14. Edwards, J. R., and L. S. Lambert (2007), ʻMethods for Integrating Moderation and Mediation: a General Analytical Framework Using Moderated Path Analysisʼ, Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
  15. Jeremy A. Bauer and Paul E. Spector (2015), ʻDiscrete Negative Emotions and Counterproductive Work Behaviorʼ, Human Performance, 28: 307-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2015.1021040
  16. Karina Van De Voorde, and Susanne Beijer (2015), ʻThe Role of Employee HR Attributions in the Relationship between High-Performance Work Systems and Employee Outcomesʼ, Human Resource Management Journal, 25(1): 62-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12062
  17. Hayes, A. F. (2012), PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
  18. Leitch, C. M., C. McMullan and R. T. Harrison (2013), ʻThe Development of Entrepreneurial Leadership: The Role of Human, Social and Institutional Capitalʼ, British Journal of Management, 24, 347-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00808.x
  19. Liu, J., Wang, H., Hui, C., and C. Lee (2012), ʻPsychological Ownership: How Having Control Mattersʼ, Journal of Management Studies, 49, 869-895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01028.x
  20. Mayhew, M. G., Ashkanasy, N. M., Bramble, T. and J. Gardner (2007), ʻA Study of the Antecedents and Consequences of Psychological Ownership in Organizational Settingsʼ, Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 477-500. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.5.477-500
  21. Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., and K. T. Dirks (2001), ʻToward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizationsʼ, Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378028
  22. Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., and K. T. Dirks (2003), ʻThe State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Researchʼ, Review of General Psychology, 7, pp. 84-107. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84
  23. Pierce, J. L., Oʼdriscoll, M. P., and A-M. Coghlan (2004), ʻWork Environment Structure and Psychological Ownership: The Mediating Effects of Control,ʼ The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(5), pp. 507-534. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.144.5.507-534
  24. Pierce, J. L., Rubenfeld, S. A., and S. Morgan (1991), ʻEmployee Ownership: A Conceptual Model of Process and Effectsʼ, Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279000
  25. Robbins, S. P. (2005), Organizational Behavior 11 th edition. Prentice Hall.
  26. Scott, S. G., and Bruce, R. A. (1994), ʻDeterminants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplaceʼ, Academy of Management Journal, 37 (3), 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  27. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995), ʻPsychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validationʼ, Academy of Management Journal, 26, 1442-1465.
  28. Sturman, M. (2003), ʻSearching for the Inverted U-shaped Relationship between Time and Performance. Meta-Analyses of the Experience, and Age Relationshipsʼ, Journal of Management, 29, 609-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00028-X
  29. Stamper, C. L. and M. C. Johlke (2003), ʻThe Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on the Relationship between Boundary Spanning Role Stress and Work Outcomesʼ, Journal of Management, 29(4), 569-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00025-4
  30. Swetman, D. and F. Luthans(2010), ʻThe Power of Positive Psychology: Psychological Capital and Work Engagement. in A. B. Baker and M. P. Leiter.(Eds.)ʻ, Work engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research. New York, NY: Psychology Pres.
  31. Van Dyne, L. and J. L. Pierce (2004), ʻPsychological Ownership and Feeling of Possession: Three Field Studies Predicting Employee Attitudes and Organizational Behaviorʼ, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, pp.439-460. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.249

Cited by

  1. 상사의 비인격적 감독이 부하직원의 직무 열의에 미치는 영향과 심리적 계약 위반의 매개 효과 vol.11, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.32599/apjb.11.2.202006.119.