Fig. 1. 1D array push broom
Fig. 2. Aircraft height(Case3)
Fig. 3. Ground speed(Case 3)
Fig. 4. Aircraft route and heading vector
Fig. 5. Aircraft Angular_rate_Roll(Case1)
Fig. 6. Aircraft Angular_rate_Pitch(Case3)
Fig. 7. Aircraft Angular_rate_Yaw(Case1)
Fig. 8. 3-Axis of aircraft and sensor
Fig. 9. Footprint of nadir and slant
Fig. 10. 4-corner coordinates
Fig. 11. Overlap rate concept and parameters
Fig. 12. Gimbal of Yaw-Pitch axis
Fig. 13. Overlap rate results of 2-axis gimbal
Fig. 14. Overlap rate results of 3-axis gimbal
Fig. 15. Overlap rate @ 12.72 μrad(rms)
Table 1. Case study results
References
- R.Anderson, et al., "State-of-the-Art-Report," IRIA #246890-3-F, ERIM, 1994.
- Gerald C. Holst, "ElECTRO-OPTICAL IMAGING SYSTEM PERFORMANCE", SPIE PRESS
- S. Lee, “A Study on the Interior Orientation for Various Image Sensors,” Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 25, No. 3D, pp. 503-508, 2005.
- J. Park and S. Jung, “An Experimental Study on the Coordinates Tracker Realization for EOTS Slaved to the Radar of a Helicoter,” Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 369-377, April, 2005. https://doi.org/10.5302/J.ICROS.2005.11.4.369
- S. Lee, H. Park and J. Lee, "The Study for Performance of 2 Axis Gimbal Equipped with an Infrared Image Sensor," Conference on Information and Control Systems, pp. 232-233, 2015.