Figure 1. Scientific model of Giere(Giere et al., 2006)
Figure 2. The characteristic of level 1 students’ modeling
Figure 3. The characteristic of level 2 students’ modeling
Table 1. The research procedure
Table 2. Progression levels of science meta-modeling knowledge(Kim, Kim, & Paik, 2019)
Table 3. The modeling of student B
Table 4. The modeling of student E
Table 5. The modeling of student A
Table 6. The modeling of student C
Table 7. The modeling of student D
References
- Alonzo, A. C., & Gotwals, A. W. (2012). Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions. Springer Science & Business Media. Rotterdam: The Netherlands.
- Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). 'An experiment is when you try it and see if it works': a study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 514-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110504
- Cho, E. J., Kim C. J., & Choe, S. U. (2017). An investigation into the secondary science teachers' perception on scientific models and modeling. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(5), 859-877. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.5.859
- Cho, H. S., Nam, J. H., & Oh, P. S. (2017). A review of model and modeling in science education: Focus on the metamodeling knowledge. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(2), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.2.0239
- Clement, J. J. (2000). Model-based learning as a key research area of science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1041-1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416901
- Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
- Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening students' understandings of modern genetics across the 5th-10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655-674. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20312
- Giere, R. N., Bickle, J, & Mauldin, R. (2006). Understanding scientific reasoning. Thomson/Wadsworth.
- Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799-822. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280907
- Jeon, Y., & Choi, A. R. (2016). Analysis of inquiry activities in high school chemistry II textbooks based on the 2009 revised science curriculum: Focus on 8 science practices. Journal of Korea Chemical Society, 60(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.1.59
- Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modeling, teachers' views on the nature of modeling, and implications for the education of modelers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110110142
- Kim, H. K., & Song, J. W. (2003). Middle school students' ideas about the purposes of laboratory work. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(3), 254-264.
- Kim, S. K., Choi, H., Park, C. Y., & Park, S. H. (2019). The chemistry teachers' perceptions and interpretations about three acid-base models. Journal of Korea Chemical Society, 63(1), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.5012/JKCS.2019.63.1.56
- Kim, S. K., Kim, J. E., & Paik, S. H. (2019). Exploring progression levels for science metamodeling knowledge of the science gifted. Journal of Korea Chemical Society, 63(2), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.5012/JKCS.2019.63.2.102
- Kim, S. K., Park, C. Y., Choi, H., & Paik, S. H. (2018). Evaluation of stated models for the floating and sinking phenomena in the chemical domain. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 62(3), 226-234. https://doi.org/10.5012/JKCS.2018.62.3.226
- Kousathana, M., Demerouti, M., & Tsaparlis, G. (2005). Instructional misconceptions in acid-base equilibria: An analysis from a history and philosophy of science perspective. Science & Education, 14(2), 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-5719-9
- Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of research in science teaching, 29(4), 331-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404
- Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. Handbook of research on science education, 2, 831-879
- Mislevy, R. J., Haertel, G., Riconscente, M., Rutstein, D. W., & Ziker, C. (2017). Evidence-centered assessment design. In Assessing Model-Based Reasoning using Evidence-Centered Design (pp. 19-24). Springer, Cham.
- Morrison, M., & Morgan, M. S. (1999). Models as mediating instruments. In M. Morrison & M. S. Morgan (Eds.), Models as mediators (pp.10-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- National Research Council(2013). The Next Generation Science Standards. National Academy Press: Washington, DC.
- Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2011). What teachers of science need to know about models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1109-1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.502191
- Park, H. K., Cho, J. R., Kim, C. J., Kim, H. B., Yoo, J. H., Jang S. H., & Choe, S. U. (2016). The change in modeling ability of science-gifted students through the co-construction of scientific model. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0015
- Rea-Ramirez, M. A., Clement, J., & Nunez-Oviedo, M. C. (2008). An instructional model derived from model construction and criticism theory. In Model based learning and instruction in science (pp. 23-43). The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
- Schwarz, C. V. (2002). Is there a connection? The role of meta-modeling knowledge in learning with models. In P. Bell, R. Stevens, & T. Satwicz (Eds.), Keeping learning complex: The proceedings of the fifth international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Schwarz, C. V., & White B. Y. (2005). Metamodeling knowledge: developing students' understanding of scientific modeling, Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165-205. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2302_1
- Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
- Somerville, R. C., & Hassol, S. J. (2011). The science of climate change. Physics Today, 64(10), 48. https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.1296
- Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Developing a hypothetical multi‐dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 687-715. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20324
Cited by
- 2009·2015 개정 교육과정 화학 I 및 화학 II 교과서 및 교사용 지도서에 제시된 산·염기 모델 내용에 대한 '이그노런스' 분석 vol.64, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.3.175