한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제39권3호
  • /
  • Pages.415-426
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

초등 일반 및 과학영재 학생의 과학 유머 유형과 창의성 수준, 과학 유머 만들기의 교육적 효과에 대한 인식 비교

Comparing Types and Creativity Level of Scientific Humors Made by General and Scientifically-Gifted Elementary Students and Their Perceptions for Educational Benefits of Making Scientific Humor

  • 투고 : 2019.04.19
  • 심사 : 2019.05.09
  • 발행 : 2019.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 초등 일반 및 과학영재 학생이 만든 과학 유머의 유형과 창의성 수준, 과학 유머 만들기의 교육적 효과에 대한 인식을 비교하였다. 이를 위해 서울특별시 소재 초등학교의 일반 학생 42명과 과학영재교육원 소속 학생 38명을 선정하였다. 그리고 이 학생들이 만든 과학 유머의 유형과 창의성 수준, 과학 유머 만들기의 교육적 효과에 대한 인식을 분석 및 비교하였다. 연구 결과, 과학 유머의 유형의 경우 생성 형태와 기술 형태 등의 '형태' 측면과 교육과정 포함 여부, 과학 학문 영역, 과학 지식 활용 유형, 상황의 작위성 등의 '내용' 측면의 생성 비율에서 과학영재 학생과 일반 학생 사이에 약간의 차이가 있었다. 또한 일반 학생보다 과학영재 학생들이 더 유창하고 융통적이며 독창적인 과학 유머를 만들었으나, 과학 유머의 유용성에 대해서는 일반 학생과 과학영재 학생들이 유사하게 평가하는 경향이 있었다. 대부분의 초등 일반 및 과학영재 학생들이 과학 유머 만들기의 인지적 및 정의적 측면에서의 교육적 효과에 대하여 긍정적으로 인식하였다.

This study compared the types and creativity level of scientific humors made by general and scientifically-gifted elementary students and their perceptions for educational benefits of making scientific humor. To do this, fifth graders (n=42) at an elementary school and fifth graders (n=38) at a gifted science education institutes in Seoul were selected. Scientific humors made by the students were analyzed and compared according to their types and creativity levels in scientific humor. The students' perceptions for educational benefits of making scientific humor were also analyzed and compared through a questionnaire. Analysis of the results reveal that there were some differences in the incidence rates in 'form' aspects (e.g., generative and descriptive forms) and 'content' aspects (e.g., inclusion of curriculum, scientific discipline, type in use of scientific knowledge, and nature of the situation) between the scientifically-gifted and general elementary students. The scientifically-gifted students also made more fluent, flexible, and original, but similarly useful scientific humors than the general students. Most of general and scientifically-gifted elementary students perceived positively the educational benefits of making scientific humor based on various cognitive and affective aspects.

키워드

Table 1. Criteria and examples of scientific humor

GHGOBX_2019_v39n3_415_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Examples of analysis for creativity in scientific humor

GHGOBX_2019_v39n3_415_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Analysis of the types by form of scientific humor

GHGOBX_2019_v39n3_415_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Analysis of the types by contents of scientific humor

GHGOBX_2019_v39n3_415_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Analysis for creativity in scientific humor

GHGOBX_2019_v39n3_415_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Analysis of perception of educational benefits for making scientific humor

GHGOBX_2019_v39n3_415_t0006.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Ardalan, K. (2015). Using entertaining metaphors in the introduction of the case method in a case-based course. In M. Li & Y. Zhao (eds) Exploring Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (pp. 69-96). Berlin: Springer.
  2. Bae, J., Cha, Y., & Choi, J. (2016). The effects of discussion activities with the use of humor on young children's creativity and flow. Journal of Future Early Childhood Education, 23(3), 293-321. https://doi.org/10.22155/JFECE.23.3.293.321
  3. Banas, J., Dunbar, N., Rodriguez, D., & Liu, S. J. (2011). A review of humor in educational settings: Four decades of research. Communication Education, 60(1), 115-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.496867
  4. Berge, M. (2017). The role of humor in learning physics: A study of undergraduate students. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 427-450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9508-4
  5. Cha, M., & Oh, H. (2006). A study on correlation between the effect of science learning and teacher's sense of humor. Journal of Science Education, 30(1), 67-83.
  6. Choi, K., Lee, S., & Chae, Y. (2016). A relationship among teaching presence, students' perceptions of class, and learning outcomes in an online science gifted education program. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 22(2), 381-408. https://doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.22.2.383
  7. Choi, W., Son, J., Lee, B., Lee, I., & Shin, Y. (2009). Development and understanding of instruments for identifying the scientifically-gifted elementary students. Seoul: Bookshill.
  8. Christensen, A. P., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., & Beaty, R. E. (2018). Clever people: intelligence and humor production ability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(2), 136-143. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000109
  9. Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  10. Greengross, G., Martin, R. A., & Miller, G. (2012). Personality traits, intelligence, humor styles, and humor production ability of professional stand-up comedians compared to college students. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025774
  11. Gentry, M., & Owen, S. V. (2004). Secondary student perceptions of classroom quality: Instrumentation and differences between advanced/honors and nonhonors classes. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(1), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2004-464
  12. Han, S. (2002). A principle of humor text and its linguistic analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyungwon University.
  13. Hur, Y. (2009). Type of teacher's humor and differential success and failure by purpose, material and expression form of teacher's humor. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 21(2), 21-50. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2009.21.2.21
  14. Hur, Y. (2011). Study on patterns of teacher's humor and educational effects of different patterns. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 23(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2011.23.1.1
  15. Ji, S., & Song, Y. (2012). Assessing instructor humor in the university classes. Global Business Administration Review, 9(4), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.17092/jibr.2012.9.4.65
  16. Jung, H., Sin, Y., & Cho, S. (2013). Analyses of curriculums at institutes for science gifted education in universities: Focused on enrichment step. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 23(2), 215-236. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2013.23.2.215
  17. Kang, J., & Yoo, M. (2016). Comparison of sense of humor, self-leadership and interpersonal skills between scientifically gifted elementary school students and general students and analysis of its relationship. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 8(1), 1-13.
  18. Kang, K. (2015). An analysis on STEAM based-gifted and talented education programs which were developed by in-service teachers. Educational Research, 64, 75-93. https://doi.org/10.17253/swueri.2015.64..003
  19. Kellerby, D. K. (2011). Effective use of humor in a secondary science classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Montana State University.
  20. Kim, Y. (2017). The expressive characteristic and meaning of 'the epic rap battle of history' genre on speech education : Focused on ERB and K-ERB. Journal of Ewha Korean Language And Literature, 43, 25-55.
  21. Koo, H. (2000). Structure and formation mechanism of humorous discourse. HAN-GEUL, 248, 159-184. https://doi.org/10.22557/HG.2000.06.248.159
  22. Koo, H. (2017). Thoughts on humor education in Korean language curriculum. Korean Language Research, 46, 5-30.
  23. Lamminpaa, J., & Vesterinen, V. (2018). The use of humour during a collaborative inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 40(14), 1718-1735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1508926
  24. Lee, B. (2015). The effect on the emotional intelligence, humor and creative personality on college students. The Journal of Creativity Education, 15(1), 35-47.
  25. Lee, B., & Son, J. (2017). Exploring the improvement plan for science-gifted education through analysis of the performance result of master plan for identifying and nurturing of science-gifted student. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(5), 775-785. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.5.775
  26. Lee, B., Son, J., Choi, W., Lee, I.,, Jhun, Y., & Choi, J. (2008). Difficulties experienced by teachers in science gifted education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 27(3), 252-260.
  27. Lee, E. J. (2010). The comparison of creativity, humor sense, and humor style between gifted and common students (Master's thesis). Incheon University, Incheon.
  28. Lee, H. (2006). Theory and practice of gifted education. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  29. Lee, J., & Kang, H. (2018). An analysis of types of scientific humors made by scientifically-gifted elementary school students and their perceptions of the making scientific humor. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 37(3), 267-284. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2018.37.3.267
  30. Lim, B., & Oh, J. (2008). A phenomenological study on the meaning of language amusement in young children's play. Journal of the Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 13(6), 219-240.
  31. Lim, C. (2014). Development of an assessment formula for scientific creativity and its application. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(2), 242-257. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.2.242
  32. Lim, J. (2007). Regarding the formation elements of humorous discourse-Focused on the humor appeared on the TV advertisements. The Studies of Korean Language and Literature, 28, 129-157.
  33. Martin, R. A. (2007). A comparison of humor styles, coping humor, and mental health between Chinese and Canadian university students. Humor, 20(3), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2007.011
  34. Nusbaum, E. C. (2015). A meta-analysis of individual differences in humor production and personality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
  35. Park, J. (2004). A suggestion of cognitive model of scientific creativity (CMSC). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(2), 375-386.
  36. Park, J. (2013). A study of leadership skills, humor sense and humor style of scientifically gifted (Master's thesis). Kyungnam University, Changwon.
  37. Park, J., Lee, K., Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2005). Developing an analysis model to evaluate science-gifted education programs and analyzing biology part of education programs of science-gifted centers in Korea. Biology Education, 33(1), 122-131.
  38. Park, K., Ryu, J., Bang, S., Yuk, K., Yoon, Y., Park, I., Lee, M., Lee, S., Lee, J., Chun, M., Jhun, Y., Cho, S., & Jin, S., (2014). Gifted education at a glance. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  39. Park, S., & Lew, K. (2014). Relationship between sense of humor and creative personality in high school students. Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 13(2), 329-342.
  40. Renzulli, J. S., & Hartman, R. K. (1971). Scale for rating behavioral characteristics of superior students. Exceptional Children, 38(3), 243-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440297103800309
  41. Roth, W. M., Ritchie, S. M., Hudson, P., & Mergard, V. (2011). A study of laughter in science lessons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 437-458. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20412
  42. Ruch, W., & Hehl, F.-J. (1998). A two-mode model of humor appreciation: Its relation to aesthetic appreciation and simplicity-complexity of personality. In W. Ruch (Ed.), The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  43. Sin, M. (2003). Language education's study on metalinguistic property of riddles. Korean Language Education, 110, 67-89.
  44. Son, M., & Kang, H. (2019). The relationships among integrative creativity, creativity in scientific humor, and perceptions of educational benefits for making scientific humor of elementary students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 38(2), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2019.38.2.191
  45. Wanzer, M. B. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903367238
  46. Ziegler, J. B. (1998). Use of humour in medical teaching. Medical Teacher, 20(4), 341-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421599880779

피인용 문헌

  1. PCK에 근거한 초등학교 교사의 과학영재수업과 발명영재수업 구성과 실천의 특징 비교 vol.39, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.3.338
  2. 초등학생의 유머 감각과 창의성, 과학 유머 창의성, 과학 유머 만들기의 교육적 효과에 대한 인식의 관계 vol.39, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.4.465