DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Probabilistic analysis of RC beams according to IS456:2000 in limit state of collapse

  • Kulkarni, Anadee M. (Department of Applied Mechanics, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Dattaa, Debarati (Department of Applied Mechanics, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology)
  • Received : 2018.05.24
  • Accepted : 2019.03.28
  • Published : 2019.07.25

Abstract

This paper investigates the probability of failure of reinforced concrete beams for limit state of collapse for flexure and shear. The influence of randomness of the variables on the failure probability is also examined. The Indian standard code for plain and reinforced concrete IS456:2000 is used for the design of beams. Probabilistic models are developed for flexure and shear according to IS456:2000. The loads considered acting on the beam are live load and dead load only. Random variables associated with the limit state equation such as grade of concrete, grade of steel, live load and dead load are identified. Probability of failure is evaluated based on the limit state equation using First Order Reliability Method (FORM). Importance of the random variables on the limit state equations are observed and the variables are accordingly reduced. The effect of the reduced parameters is checked on the probability of failure. The results show the role of each parameter on the design of beam. Thus, the Indian standard guidelines for plain and reinforced concrete IS456:2000 is investigated with the probabilistic and risk-based analysis and design for a simple beam. The results obtained are also compared with the literature and accordingly some suggestions are made.

Keywords

References

  1. Balaji, A., Aathira, M. S., Pillai, T. M. and Nagarajan, P. (2016), "Reliability studies on RC beams exposed to fire based on IS456: 2000 design methods", Struct. Eng. Mech., 59(5), 853-866. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.59.5.853.
  2. Ceribasi, S. (2017), "Probabilistic computation of the structural performance of moment resisting steel frames", Steel Compos. Struct., 24(3), 369-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.24.3.369.
  3. COMREL Version 9 (2016). RCP GmbH. www.strurel.de
  4. Delgado, J., de Azeredo, M. and Delgado, R. (2000), "Probability of failure estimation of current reinforced structures using the Latin Hypercube Sampling", WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 45.
  5. Desayi, P. and Rao, K.B. (1989), "Reliability of reinforced concrete beams in limit state of cracking - Failure rate analysis approach", Mater. Struct., 22(4), 269-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472559.
  6. El-Reedy, M.A. (2012), Reinforced Concrete Structural Reliability, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  7. Galambos, T.V. and Ellingwood, B. (1986), "Serviceability limit states: Deflection", J. Struct. Eng., 112(1), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:1(67).
  8. Ghasemi, S. H. and Nowak, A. S. (2017), "Reliability index for non-normal distributions of limit state functions", Struct. Eng. Mech., 62(3), 365-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.3.365.
  9. Haldar, A. and Mahadevan, S. (2000), Probability, Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design, John Wiley and Sons, USA.
  10. Honfi, D., Martensson, A. and Thelandersson, S. (2012), "Reliability of beams according to Eurocodes in serviceability limit state", Eng. Struct., 35, 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.003.
  11. Hossain, N.B. and Stewart, M.G. (2001), "Probabilistic models of damaging deflections for floor elements", J. Performance Construct. Facilities, 15(4), 135-140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2001)15:4(135).
  12. Indian Standard, I. S. 456. (2000), Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Practice (4th revision), BIS, New Delhi, India.
  13. Jain, A. and Jain, A. (2002), Reinforced Concrete: Limit State Design, Nemchand and Bros., Roorkee, India
  14. Kmet, S., Tomko, M., Demjan, I., Pesek, L. and Priganc, S. (2016), "Analysis of a damaged industrial hall subjected to the effects of fire", Struct. Eng. Mech., 58(5), 757-781. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.58.5.757.
  15. NPTEL (2009), Numerical Problems on Singly Reinforced Rectangular Beams; IIT Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India. https://nptel.ac.in/courses/105105104/6
  16. Ranganathan, R. (1990), Reliability Analysis and Design of Structures, Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, India.
  17. Sakka, Z.I., Assakkaf, I.A. and Qazweeni, J.S. (2018), "Reliability-based assessment of damaged concrete buildings", Struct. Eng. Mech., 65(6), 751-760. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.65.6.751.
  18. Stewart, M.G. (1996a), "Optimization of serviceability load combinations for structural steel beam design", Structural Safety, 18(2), 225-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(96)00012-4.
  19. Stewart, M.G. (1996b), "Serviceability reliability analysis of reinforced concrete structures", J. Struct. Eng., 122(7), 794-803. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:7(794).
  20. Varghese, P.C. (2002), Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete, 2nd Edition, Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India.
  21. Zhao, W., Shi, X. and Tang, K. (2016), "A response surface method based on sub-region of interest for structural reliability analysis", Struct. Eng. Mech., 57(4), 587-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.57.4.587.