Journal of Technology Innovation (기술혁신연구)

Korea Society for Innovation Managemetn & Economics (기술경영경제학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mission-oriented Innovation Policy and Korea's Social Problem Solving Innovation Policy: a Case Study

'임무지향적 혁신정책'의 관점에서 본 사회문제 해결형 연구개발 정책 - '제2차 과학기술기반 사회문제 해결 종합계획' 사례 분석 -

  • Received : 2019.09.29
  • Accepted : 2019.11.29
  • Published : 2019.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examines the social problem-solving R&D policies from the perspective of 'Mission-oriented innovation policy'. To this end, we analyzed the 'second science and technology-based social problem solving plan' in terms of civil society's participation, securing the government's dynamic capabilities, and government's risk investments. The plan introduces an institutional framework for civic participation for social problem-solving innovation, strengthening R&D program coordination and integration, and new innovation ecosystem formation. However, there is a need for a concrete program to overcome a path dependency of existing activities. Otherwise new institutions are likely to be formalized. In addition, in order to derive risk investment, it is necessary to integrate innovation policy with social policy fields such as community care and climate change. It is necessary to establish an policy process that combines the agenda of social policy beyond with R & D policy, and to forms a platform for problem solving, integrates various technologies, industries and resources.

본 연구에서는 사회적 도전과제 해결을 임무로 설정하여 이론과 정책을 개발하고 있는 임무지향적 혁신정책론의 관점에서 사회문제 해결형 연구개발정책을 점검하고 그 시사점을 살펴본다. 이를 위해 시민사회의 참여, 정부의 동태적 능력의 확보, 선도적 투자와 후속 투자의 유도의 측면에서 '제2차 과학기술기반 사회문제 해결 종합계획'을 분석했다. 이 계획은 사회문제 해결형 혁신을 위한 시민참여의 제도화, 정부의 조정·통합능력 강화와 새로운 생태계 형성을 위한 제도들을 도입하고 있다. 그러나 기존 활동의 경로의존성이 있기 때문에 이를 넘어서기 위한 구체적인 프로그램이 요구되는 상황이다. 또 선도적인 투자를 이끌어내기 위해서는 커뮤니티 케어, 기후변화 대응과 같은 사회정책 분야의 전략 사업과 혁신정책을 통합적으로 전개하는 것이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. 과학기술정보통신부 (2018), 국민생활연구 추진전략.
  2. 국가과학기술심의회 (2013), 과학기술기반 사회문제해결 종합실천계획.
  3. 국가과학기술자문회의 (2018), 제2차 과학기술 기반 국민생활(사회) 문제 해결 종합계획(안).
  4. 미래창조과학부.한국과학기술기획평가원 (2016), 사회문제 해결형 R&D사업 운영.관리 가이드라인.
  5. 사회혁신팀 편역 (2014), 지속가능한 사회.기술시스템으로의 전환: 이론과 실천. (Sterrenberg L., Andringa, J., Loorbach, D., Raven, R., and Wieczorek, A.(2013), Low-carbon Transition through System Innovation: Theoretical notions and application, Pioneers into Practice Mentoring Programme 2013), 과학기술정책연구원.
  6. 송위진 엮음 (2017), 사회.기술시스템 전환: 이론과 실천, 한울아카데미.
  7. 송위진.김수은.성지은 (2019), "사례연구를 통해 본 공공연구기관의 사회문제 해결형 연구개발: 자원순환형 음식물 쓰레기 처리 시스템 개발", 과학기술학연구, 제19권, 제1호.
  8. 송위진.성지은 (2013), 사회문제 해결을 위한 과학기술혁신정책, 한울아카데미.
  9. 송위진.성지은(2019a), "지속가능한 전환의 관점에서 본 출연(연) 사회문제 해결형 연구개발의 현황과 과제 : 포커스 그룹 인터뷰를 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 제22권, 제1호.
  10. 송위진.성지은(2019b), "전환적 혁신정책의 관점에서 본 사회문제 해결형 R&D 정책: 제2차 과학기술기반 사회문제해결 종합계획을 중심으로", 과학기술학연구, 제19권, 제2호.
  11. 송위진.성지은.김종선.강민정.박희제 (2018), 사회문제 해결을 위한 과학기술과 사회혁신, 한울아카데미.
  12. Bonvillian, W. (2018), DARPA and its ARPA-E and IARPA Clones: a Unique Innovation Organization Model, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.27, No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty007
  13. Diercks, G., Larsen, H. and Steward, F. (2019), "Transformative Innovation Policy: Addressing Variety in an Emerging Policy Paradigm", Research Policy, Vol. 48, No. 4.
  14. Funtowicz, S. and J. Ravetz (1999), "Post-Normal Science: An Insight Now Measuring", Futures, Vol. 31, pp.641-646. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00023-3
  15. Geels, F. (2004), "From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-technical Systems Insights about Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional theory", Research Policy, Vol. 33, pp.897-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
  16. Grillitsch, M., Hansen, T., Coenen, L., Miorner, J., and Moodysson, J. (2019), "Innovation Policy for System-wide Transformation: The Case of Strategic Innovation Programmes(SIPs) in Sweden", Research Policy, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp.1048-1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.004
  17. Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (2019), A Mission-Oriented UK Industrial Strategy.
  18. Kattel, R. and Mazzucato (2018), M., Mission-oriented Innovation Policy and Dynamic Capabilities in the Public Sector, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.27, No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty007
  19. Kuhlmann S. and Rip, A. (2018), "Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges", Science and Public Policy, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp.448-454. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy011
  20. Leadbeater, C. (2018), "Postscript: Movements with Mission make Markets", Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 27, No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty007
  21. Loorbach, D. and Rotmans, J.(2010), "The Practice of Transition Management: Examples and Lessons from Four Distinct Cases", Futures, 42, pp.237-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009
  22. Mazzucato, M. (2018a), Mission-oriented Research and Innovation in the European Union, European Commission.
  23. Mazzucato, M. (2018b), Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 27, No. 5.
  24. Mazzucato, M. (2019), Governing Missions in the European Union. European Commission.
  25. Meyer, W., and Rowan,. B. (1977). "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony," American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83, pp.340-63. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
  26. Muir, R. and Parker, I. (2014), Many to Many: How the Relational State will transform Public Service, Institute for Public Policy Research.
  27. Mulgan, G. (2012), Government with People: the Outlines of Relational State, Institute for Public Policy Research.
  28. OECD (2015), System Innovation: Synthesis Report.
  29. PROSO (2018), Engaging Society for Responsible Research and Innovation, European Commission.
  30. Schot, J. and E. Steinmueller (2018), "Three Frames for Innovation Policy: R&D, Systems of Innovation and Transformative Change", Research Policy, Vol. 47, pp.1554-1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
  31. Sutcliffe, H. (2011), A Report on Responsible Research & Innovation, London: MATTER Business Group.
  32. Teece, D. (2016), "Dynamic Capabilities and Entrepreneurial Management in Large Organization: Towards a Theory of the (entrepreneurial) Firm", European Economic Review, Vol. 86, 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.11.006
  33. Teece, D., Pisano, G. and Amy, S. (1997). "Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management". Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  34. Uyarra, E., Ribeiro, B., and Dale-Clough, L. (2019), "Exploring the Normative Turn in Regional Innovation Policy: Responsibility and the Quest for Public Value", European Planning Studies, Vol. 27, No. 12.
  35. VITO (2012), Transition in Research. Research in Transition.