Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회지)

Korea Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Interaction Types in Home Economics Pre-service Teacher's Instruction Using Advanced Flanders Verbal Interaction Analysis Method

Flanders의 언어 상호작용 분석법을 활용한 가정과 예비교사의 수업 분석

  • Yang, Ji Sun (Graduate School of Education, Ewha Womans University)
  • Received : 2018.11.12
  • Accepted : 2019.03.05
  • Published : 2019.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the home economics pre-service teachers' verbal interactions during their teaching practicum. For this purpose, the class interactions of four pre-service teachers were recorded, and the data were analyzed using advanced Flanders' verbal interaction analysis. The major findings are as follows: First, the item with the highest proportion of occurrences consisted of the pre-service teachers' 'lectures', 'nonverbal conditions' and 'asks questions'. 'forms a positive learning atmosphere' and 'praises or encourages' exhibited fewer occurrences, and there was little 'giving direction', 'criticizing students or justifying authority'. Second, the instances of class interactions appeared in the form of 'asks questions-student talk response' or 'lecture-asks questions', and in the last class were 'ask questions-student talk initiation' and 'accepts or uses ideas of students'. Third, trends of verbal interactions tend to be generally indirect, and students' remarks have appeared acceptable and compassionate. Fourth, according to expert analysis, 'class management questions' and 'diffusion questions' have increased. Pre-service teachers can guide students through their learning activities, and students can expand their thinking through the teachers' questions. As these results demonstrate, self-study analyses of pre-service teachers and active support in field are needed.

본 연구는 교육실습 동안 가정과 예비교사의 수업 상황에서 언어 상호작용을 분석하는 데 목적을 두었다. 4명의 가정과 예비교사를 대상으로 수업참여 관찰을 한 이후 녹화된 자료를 AF 분석을 활용하여 분석하였으며, 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 가정과 예비교사의 언어 상호작용을 항목별로 살펴보면 교사의 '강의', '비언어적 상황', 교사의 '질문' 순으로 높게 나타났다. 학습자의 '긍정적인 학습 분위기 조성', '칭찬이나 격려' 항목에서는 빈도가 낮게 나타났으며 학습자에게 '지시' 혹은 '학생 비판이나 교사의 권위를 정당화'는 거의 이루어지지 않았다. 둘째, 수업 상호작용의 형태는 '교사의 질문-학생의 반응적인 발언' 혹은 '강의-질문'의 형태로 나타났으며 마지막 수업에서는 '교사의 질문-학생의 주도적인 발언', '강의-교사의 질문-칭찬이나 격려, 학생의 아이디어 수용 및 활용' 순으로 나타났다. 셋째, 수업에서 지수 경향은 전체적으로 비지시적인 경향을 띠며, 학습자의 발언에 허용적으로 나타났다. 교사의 질문비가 높고 첫 수업에서 학생의 발언비와 넓은 답변비는 낮게 나타났으나 마지막 수업에서는 높게 나타났다. 넷째, 전문가 분석에서 수업 운영에 대한 질문과 확산형 질문이 증가하였으며 교사는 학생들의 학습활동을 안내하고 학생들은 교사의 질문에 대하여 확산적인 사고를 하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구를 통해 예비교사들이 교과 지식의 전달을 촉진하고 학생과 적극적인 언어 상호작용이 이루어지도록 자기수업 분석과 함께 현장에서의 적극적인 지원이 요구된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baek, J. E., & Kim, K. H. (2010). Analysis of Flanders' verbal instruction type on excellent class in elementary school. Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 20(1), 79-98.
  2. Baek, J. E., & Kim, K. H. (2015). Design and development of the verbal interaction analysis program for supporting teaching consultation. The Journal of Korean Association Of Computer Education, 18(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2015.18.1.001
  3. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  4. Blosser, P. E. (2000). How to ask the right questions. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
  5. Byun, Y. K., & Lee, S. S. (2003). 수업설계 [Instructional design]. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  6. Cheon, H. S. (2005). A study of the method of the classroom activities analysis in social studies: Focusing on observation, lesson recording, view of analysis. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 37(3), 231-253.
  7. Cho, Y. D. (1999). Participation structures in secondary economic education of Korea. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 29, 193-225.
  8. Chun, S. Y., Lee, O. H., & Jeon, M. A. (2017). Analysis of teachers' teaching effectiveness by utilizing the ICALT observation tool. Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 517-536. doi:10.17232/KSET.33.2.517
  9. Chung, M. K., & Kim, K. H. (2006). Development on instructional analysis program for improvement of teacher's instructional profession. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 10(3), 371-384.
  10. Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional learning. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  11. Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. MA: Addison Wesley.
  12. Gagne, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1979). Principles of instructional design(2nd ed.). NY: Holt. Rinehart, & Winston.
  13. Imm, C. B., & Lee, H. J. (2006). 수업 전문성 일반 기준과 활용 방안 [General standard of instruction professionalism and utilization plan]. Jincheon: Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  14. Imm, C. B., Lee, H. J., Choi, S. H., Oh, E. S., Lee, K. E., Lee, S. J.,...Kwon, S. D. (2006). 수업평가 기준 개발 연구 (III) [Development of evaluation standards for instruction III]. Jincheon: Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  15. Kang, C. S. (2014). Observation and analysis of pre-service teachers' verbal interaction in the social studies class. Research in Social Studies Education, 21(3), 67-83.
  16. Kang, S. C. (2005). Developing the online system for observing the instruction to improve Flanders' linguistic interaction analysis method. Korea Association of Educational Information & Media, 11(2), 243-267.
  17. Kim, K. H. (2004). The effects of computer assisted self-supervision on the improvement of teaching skill and teaching efficacy for beginning teachers. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 21(1), 53-85.
  18. Kim, K. H. (2009). 수업의 새로운 발견: AF 분석 따라잡기 [New discovery of instruction: emulate AF analysis]. 2009 경기도 초등수업분석 연구회 하계연수자료.
  19. Kim, S. M., & Kim, M. H. (2013). Case studies for consulting of elementary mathematics teaching based on Flanders's interaction analysis category system. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 16(3), 211-227. doi:10.7468/jksmec.2013.16.3.211
  20. Kramsch, C. J. (1987). Foreign language textbooks' construction of foreign reality. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 44, 95-119. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.44.1.95
  21. Kwak, E. C., Joo, B. H., & Bae, K. B. (2017). An analysis on the verbal interaction of advanced physical education teachers in middle school. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 56(2), 289-301. doi:10.23949/kjpe.2017.03.56.2.20
  22. Kwon, G. D., & Choi, M. S. (2013). A comparison study between excellent classes & regular classes of elementary schools using the Flanders interaction analysis system. The Korean Journal of Child Education, 22(2), 37-51.
  23. Lee, E. H., & Park, I. W. (2017). A Conceptual analysis on instructional coaching, instructional supervision, and instructional consulting. Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 105-135. doi:10.17232/KSET.33.1.105
  24. Lee, H. G. (2008). 수업, 비평의 눈으로 읽다 [Class, read with critical eyes]. Seoul: Uri Education.
  25. Lee, H. J., Oh, S. C., & Hong, S. J. (2006). A study on plan for activation of instructional consulting. Study on Open Education Implementation, 10, 33-63.
  26. Lee, Y. G., & Lee, J. K. (2014). Analysis on gifted class in mathematics using Flanders category system. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 14(5), 512-523. doi:10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.05.512
  27. McGraw, F. M. (1965). The use of 35mm: Time lapse photography as a feedback and observation instrument in teacher education. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  28. McMillan, J. H. (2014). Classroom assessment: principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction, 6th Edition. Pearson Education.
  29. Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1996). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Sin, J. H. (2014). An analysis of differences between preservice teachers and career teachers of instructional form using Flanders interaction analysis method. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 17(3), 115-137. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2014.17.3.115
  31. Tuckman, B. W. (1976). Feedback and the change process. Phi Delta Kappan, 57(5), 341-344.
  32. Withall, J. (1949). The development of a technique for the measurement of social-emotional climate in classrooms. Journal of Experimental Education, 17, 347-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1949.11010391