지역연구 (Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association)

한국지역학회 (Korean Regional Science Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

산업 및 직종의 상호연관적 다양성과 비연관적 다양성이 지역의 경제성장에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Related and Unrelated Varieties of Industry and Occupation on Regional Economic Growth in Korea

  • 송창현 (연세대학교 대학원 도시공학과) ;
  • 김찬용 (연세대학교 대학원 도시공학과) ;
  • 임업 (연세대학교 도시공학과)
  • 투고 : 2019.06.19
  • 심사 : 2019.06.26
  • 발행 : 2019.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 산업 및 직종의 상호연관적 다양성과 비연관적 다양성이 지역의 경제성장에 미치는 영향을 실증적으로 분석하는 데에 있다. 지역경제성장의 메커니즘을 다룬 최근의 연구들은 산업을 넘어 직종의 상호연관적 다양성과 비연관적 다양성이 지식외부효과를 유발함으로써 지역경제성장의 동력으로 작용한다고 주장한다. 이에 본 연구에서는 산업다양성과 함께 직종다양성의 영향을 포괄적으로 분석하였다. 실증분석을 위해서는 전국사업체조사와 인구주택총조사 자료를 사용하였으며 지역노동시장권을 분석의 공간적 단위로 설정하였다. 종속변수는 2010년부터 2015년 사이의 지역별 지역내총생산 및 고용 성장으로 설정하였으며 핵심 설명변수인 산업 및 직종의 상호연관적 다양성과 비연관적 다양성은 엔트로피 접근법에 기초하여 측정하였다. 분석결과에 따르면, 산업의 상호연관적 다양성은 지역의 1인당 지역내총생산 성장에, 직종의 상호연관적 다양성은 지역의 고용 성장에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 반면 산업의 비연관적 다양성은 지역의 고용 성장에 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 산업 및 직종 부문의 다양성을 상호연관적 다양성과 비연관적 다양성으로 세분하여 지역경제성장에 미치는 영향을 분석함으로써 지역의 경제적 활력 강화를 목적으로 하는 지역 단위의 정책의제에 대한 시사점을 이끌어내고자 하였다.

The purpose of this paper is to empirically analyze the effects of related and unrelated varieties of industry and occupation on regional economic growth. Recent studies dealing with the mechanism of economic growth argue that occupation as well as industry act as the driving force of regional economic growth by inducing knowledge externalities. Therefore, this study comprehensively analyzed the effects of occupational diversity along with industrial diversity. For the empirical analysis, we set the regional labor market areas as the spatial units of analysis. Dependent variables include regional per capita GRDP and employment growth between 2010 and 2015, and related and unrelated variety of industry and occupations measured based on the entropy approach are used as key explanatory variables. Our empirical results show that the related variety of industry has a positive effect on per capita GRDP in the region, and the related variety of occupation has a positive effect on regional employment growth. On the other hand, the unrelated variety of industries shows a negative correlation with regional employment growth. Based on the empirical results, this paper provides regional policy implications for strengthening economic vitality by dividing the diversity of industry and occupation into related and unrelated varieties and analyzing how they affect regional economic growth.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 류수열.최기홍.윤성민, 2013, 산업구조 다양성이 지역경제의 성과에 미치는 영향, 지역사회연구, 21(1), pp.73-94. https://doi.org/10.22921/JRS.2013.21.1.004
  2. 안국신, 1999, 신경제학개론(제3판), 서울: 율곡출판사.
  3. 윤윤규.배기준.윤미례.이상호.최효미.김준영.신인철.정준호, 2012, 한국의 지역노동시장권 2010: 방법론, 설정 및 평가, 서울: 한국노동연구원.
  4. 이번송.홍성효, 2001, 시군구별 제조업 생산성 성장요인과 수도권집중억제정책의 효과, 국제경제연구, 7(1), pp.125-146.
  5. 이상호, 2008, 지역노동시장권(LLMAs)의 측정과 적용가능성에 관한 연구, 노동정책연구, 8(4), pp.147-182. https://doi.org/10.22914/JLP.2008.8.4.006
  6. 통계청, 2007, 도시권획정, 대전: 통계청.
  7. Attaran, M., 1986, Industrial diversity and economic performance in U.S areas, Annals of Regional Science, 20(2), pp.44-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287240
  8. Barbour, E., and Markusen, A., 2007, Regional occupational and industrial structure: Does one imply the other?, International Regional Science Review, 30(1), pp.72-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017606296727
  9. Currid, E., and Stolarick, K., 2008, The occupational-industry mismatch: New trajectories for regional cluster analysis and economic development, Urban Studies, 47(2), pp.337-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009349024
  10. Boschma, R., 2005, Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment, Regional Studies, 39(1), pp.61-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
  11. Drucker, J., and Feser, E., 2012, Regional industrial structure and agglomeration economies: An analysis of productivity in three manufacturing industries, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(1), pp.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.04.006
  12. Duranton, G., and Puga, D., 2004, Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies, In Henderson, J. V., and Jacques Francois, T. (Eds), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 4 (pp.2063-2117) Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
  13. Feser, E. J., 2003, What regions do rather than make: A proposed set of knowledge-based occupation clusters, Urban Studies, 40(10), pp.1937-1958. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000116059
  14. Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., and Verburg, T., 2007, Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth, Regional Studies, 41(5), pp.685-697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296
  15. Gabe, T. M., and Kraybill, D. S., 2002, The effect of state economic development incentives on employment growth of establishments, Journal of Regional Science, 42(4), pp.703-730. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9787.00278
  16. Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., and Shleifer, A., 1992, Growth in cities, Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), pp.1126-1152. https://doi.org/10.1086/261856
  17. Henderson, V., Kuncoro, A., and Turner, M., 1995, Industrial development in cities, Journal of Political Economy, 103(5), pp.1067-1090. https://doi.org/10.1086/262013
  18. Jacobs, J., 1969, The Economy of Cities, New York, NY: Vintage Books.
  19. Jacquemin, A. P., and Berry, C. H., 1979, Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth, Journal of Industrial Economics, 27(4), pp.359-369. https://doi.org/10.2307/2097958
  20. Koo, J., 2005, How to analyze the regional economy with occupation data, Economic Development Quarterly, 19(4), pp.356-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242405279910
  21. Malizia, E. E., and Ke, S., 1993, The influence of economic diversity on employment and stability, Journal of Regional Science, 33(2), pp.221-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1993.tb00222.x
  22. Markusen, A., and Schrock, G., 2001, Occupational Advantage: Detecting and Enhancing Occupational Mix in Regional Development, Working Paper 256, Project on Regional and Industrial Economics, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
  23. Markusen, A., 2004, Targeting occupation in regional and community economic development, Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(3), pp.253-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976377
  24. Neffke, F., and Henning, M., 2013, Skill relatedness and firm diversification, Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), pp.297-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2014
  25. Nolan, C., Morrison, E., Kumar, I., Galloway, H., and Cordes, S., 2011, Linking industry and occupation clusters in regional economic development, Economic Development Quarterly, 25(1), pp.26-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242410386781
  26. Pagano, P., and Schivardi, F., 2003, Firm size distribution growth, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 105(2), pp.255-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.t01-1-00008
  27. Parr, J. B., 1965, Specialization, diversification, and regional development, Professional Geography, 17(6), pp.21-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1965.021_h.x
  28. Porter, M. E., 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York, NY: Free Press.
  29. Rodger, A., 1957, Some aspects of industrial diversification in the United States, Economic Geography, 33(1), pp.16-31. https://doi.org/10.2307/142564
  30. Thompson, W. R., and Thompson, P. R., 1985, From industries to occupations: Rethinking local economic development, Economic Development Commentary, 9(1), pp.12-18.
  31. Van Stel, A., and Storey, D., 2004, The link between firm births and job creation: Is there a upas tree effect?, Regional Studies, 38(8), pp.893-909. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280929
  32. Wixe, S., and Andersson, M., 2017, Which types of relatedness matter in regional growth? Industry, occupation and education, Regional Studies, 51(4), pp.523-536. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1112369