Digital Diplomacy via Social Networks: A Cross-National Analysis of Governmental Usage of Facebook and Twitter for Digital Engagement

  • Ittefaq, Muhammad (William Allen White School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of Kansas)
  • 발행 : 2019.07.22


Over the last couple of years, digital diplomacy has become a fascinating area of research among Mass Communication, Peace and Conflict Studies, and International Affairs scholars. Social media and new technology open up new avenues for governments, individuals, and organizations to engage with foreign audiences. However, developing countries' governments are still lacking in the realization of the potential of social media. This study aims to analyze the usage of social media (Facebook & Twitter) by the two biggest countries in South Asia (Pakistan and India). I selected 10 government officials' social media accounts including prime ministers', national press offices', military public relations offices', public diplomacy divisions', and ministries of foreign offices' profiles. The study relies on quantitative content analysis and a comparative research approach. The total number of analyzed Twitter tweets (n=1,015) and Facebook posts (n=1,005) include 10 accounts, five from each country. In light of Kent and Taylor's (1998) dialogic communication framework, the results indicate that no digital engagement and dialogue occurs between government departments and the public through social networking sites. Government departments do not engage with local or foreign audiences through digital media. When comparing both countries, results reveal that India has more institutionalized and organized digital diplomacy. In terms of departmental use of social media, the digital diplomacy division and foreign office of India is more active than other government departments in that nation. Meanwhile, Pakistan's military public relations office and press office is more active than its other government departments. In conclusion, both countries realize the potential of social media in digital diplomacy, but still lack engagement with foreign audiences.



  1. Baloch, M. S. (2017 December 19). After Quetta Church Attack, Pakistan Continues to Blame Foreign Powers for Terrorism. The Diplomat. Retrieved from
  2. Central Intellegence Agency (2019). The World Factbook. Retierved from
  3. Cha, H., Yeo, S., & Kim, B. (2014). Social Media's Dialogic Communication of Foreign Embassies in Korea and Public Diplomacy: Based on Dialogic Communication Theory, Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.63 (NGCIT 2014), pp.175-178
  4. Ciolek, M. (2010). Understanding Social Media's Contribution to Public Diplomacy" How Embassy Jakarta's Facebook Outreach Illuminates the Limitations and Potential for the State Department's Use of Social Media. USC Center on Public Diplomacy at Annenberg School. Winner, Best Student Paper in Public Diplomacy 2010.
  5. Cull, N. J. (2009). Public diplomacy: Lessons from the past. CPD Perspectives on Public diplomacy, 2(19).
  6. Cull, N. J. (2018). The Long Road to Digitalized Diplomacy: A Short History of the Internet in U.S. Public Diplomacy. Revista Mexicana de Política Exterior.
  7. Dhanapalan, B. (2014). Communicating India's soft power: Buddha to Bollywood [Review of the book Communicating India's soft power: Buddha to Bollywood]. Asian Journal of Communication 24, (6), 617-618,
  8. Dodd, M. D., & Collins, S. J. (2017). Public relations message strategies and public diplomacy 2.0: An empirical analysis using Central-Eastern European and Western Embassy Twitteraccounts. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 417-425.
  9. Fan, Y., & Shahani, A. (2016). Country image of Pakistan: a preliminary study. International Journal of Tourism Research, 18(3), 220-227.
  10. Golan, G. J., Manor, I., & Arceneaux, P. (2019). Mediated Public Diplomacy Redefined: Foreign Stakeholder Engagement via Paid, Earned, Shared, and Owned Media. American Behavioral Scientist, 0002764219835279.
  11. Hanson, C. E. (2012). Proceedings from International Political Science Association Congress on Public Diplomacy and Rising Powers in the Digital Age Madrid, Spain.
  12. Ittefaq, M. (2017, September 27). Pakistan: A Sorry State of Digital Diplomacy. Retrieved from
  13. Ittefaq, M., & Iqbal, A. (2018). Digitization of the health sector in Pakistan: challenges and opportunities to online health communication: A case study of MARHAM social and mobile media. Digital Health, 4, 2055207618789281.
  14. Jiang, L., & Bjola, C. (2015). Social media and public diplomacy: a comparative analysis of the digital diplomatic strategies of the EU, US and Japan in China. In Digital Diplomacy (pp. 85-102). Routledge.
  15. Jiang, Y. (2016). The use of Chinese social media by foreign embassies: How 'generative technologies' are offering opportunities for modern diplomacy. In M. G. and K.B. Making Publics, Making Places. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.
  16. Kampf, R., Manor, L., & Segev, E. (2015). Digital Diplomacy 2.0? A Cross-national Comparison of Public Engagement in Facebook and Twitter. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 10 (4).
  17. Kaplan, D. R. (2012). What's Wrong with Pakistan: Why geography--unfortunately-is destiny for South Asia's troubled heartland. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from
  18. Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321-334.
  19. Khatib, L., Dutton, W., & Thelwall, M. (2012). Public Diplomacy 2.0: A Case Study of the US Digital Outreach Team. The Middle East Journal, 66, (3), 453-472.
  20. Lee, B. J. (2017). Social Media-based Public Diplomacy in Korea. Asian Communication Research, 14(2), 69-99.
  21. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human communication research, 28(4), 587-604.
  22. Manor, I. (2017, August). The Digitalization of Diplomacy: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Terminology. Working Paper. Exploring Digital Diplomacy.
  23. Manor, I. (2019). The Digitalization of Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
  24. Mahapatra, D. A. (2016). From a latent to a 'strong' soft power? The evolution of India's cultural diplomacy. Palgrave Communications, 2, 16091.
  25. Malone, D. M. (2011). Soft power in Indian foreign policy. Economic and Political Weekly, 35-39.
  26. Ministry of External Affairs India. (2017). Retrieved from
  27. Ministry of Foreign Affairs Pakistan. (2017). Retrieved from
  28. Mishra, A. (2017). Winning hearts and minds": Assessing India's soft power diplomacy in Afghanistan. South Asia Journal. Retrieved from
  29. Murti, B. (2013). India's Use of Digital Media to Engage with Diaspora as Part of its Public Diplomacy Outreach: A case study analysis of the website of Overseas Indian Facilitation Centre. (Electronic Thesis or Dissertation). American University, Washington: D.C.
  30. Observer Research Foundation. (2018). The Rising Role of Buddhism in India's Soft Power Strategy Issue No. 228. New Delhi, India: SHANTANU KISHWAR.
  31. O'Boyle, J. (2018). Twitter diplomacy between India and the United States: Agenda-building analysis of tweets during presidential state visits. Global Media and Communication, 1742766518818859.
  32. Ociepka, B. (2012). Impact of New Technologies on International Communication: The Case of Public Diplomacy. Information Science, (59), 24-36.
  33. Park, S., Chung, D., & Park, H. W. (2018). Analytical framework for evaluating digital diplomacy using network analysis and topic modeling: Comparing South Korea and Japan. Information Processing & Management.
  34. Purushothaman, U. (2010). Shifting perceptions of power: Soft power and India's foreign policy. Journal of Peace Studies, 17(2&3), 1-16.
  35. Samuel-Azran, T., Ilovici, B., Zari, I., & Geduild, O. (2019). Practicing citizen diplomacy 2.0: "The Hot Dudes and Hummus-Israel's Yummiest" campaign for Israel's branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15(1), 38-49.
  36. Sevin, E., & Manor, I. (2019). From Embassy Ties to Twitter Links: Comparing Offline and Online Diplomatic Networks. Policy & Internet.
  38. Simons, G. (2014). Russian public diplomacy in the 21st century: Structure, means and message. Public Relations Review, 40(3), 440-449.
  39. Simunjak, M., & Caliandro, A. (2019). Twiplomacy in the age of Donald Trump: Is the diplomatic code changing? The Information Society, 35(1), 13-25.
  40. Spry, D. (2018). Facebook diplomacy: A data-driven, user-focused approach to Facebook use by diplomatic missions. Media International Australia, 168(1), 62-80.
  41. Sundstorm, B., & Levenshus, B. A. (2017). The art of engagement: dialogic strategies on Twitter, Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 21 Issue: 1, pp.17-33,
  42. Straus, N., Kruikemeier, S., van der Meulen, H., & van Noort, G. (2015). Digital diplomacy in GCC countries: Strategic communication of Western embassies on Twitter. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 369-379.
  43. Suri, N. (2014a). Public Diplomacy in India's Foreign Policy. Strategic Analysis, 35:2, 297-303, DOI: 10.1080/09700161.2011.542927.
  44. Suri, N. (2014b). India Is-Old & New. Rising Soft Powers India. (pp. 55-57). Los Angeles, CA: Center on Public Diplomacy (CPD).
  45. Tauqeer Sheikh, A. (2017, March 25). Pakistan's water diplomacy. Dawn. Retrieved from
  46. Tharoor, S. (2011). India as a soft power. India international centre quarterly, 38(3/4), 330-343.
  47. Tomiczek, M. (2012). About communication in social media - an analysis of the Polish Presidency Facebook Profile from a perspective of social communication theory, Journal of Education Culture and Society No. 1_2012: DOI: 10.15503/jecs20121-47-60.
  48. Twiplomacy Study. (2018). Twiplomacy Study 2018. Retrieved from
  49. United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy (2015). Comprehensive Annual Report on Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting Focus on Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Data. Edited by Katherine Brown, Chris Hensman and Palak Bhandari.
  50. Waters, R. D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., & Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 102-106.
  51. Yepsen, E. A. (2012). Practicing successful twitter public diplomacy: A model and case study of US efforts in Venezuela. CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy Paper, 6.
  52. Zia, L. (2014, July 25). Transitioning from traditional diplomacy to digital diplomacy. Daily Times. Retrieved from

피인용 문헌

  1. Do North Korean Social Media Show Signs of Change?: An Examination of a YouTube Channel Using Qualitative Tagging and Social Network Analysis vol.19, pp.1, 2020,