Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improved nodal equivalence with leakage-corrected cross sections and discontinuity factors for PWR depletion analysis

  • Lee, Kyunghoon (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Woosong (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Yonghee (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2018.12.28
  • Accepted : 2019.02.18
  • Published : 2019.06.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper introduces a new two-step procedure for PWR depletion analyses. This procedure adopts the albedo-corrected parameterized equivalence constants (APEC) method to correct the lattice-based raw cross sections (XSs) and discontinuity factors (DFs) by accounting for neutron leakage. The intrinsic limitations of the conventional two-step methods are discussed by analyzing a 2-dimensional SMR with the commercial DeCART2D/MASTER code system. For a full-scope development of the APEC correction, the MASTER nodal code was modified so that the group constants can be corrected in the middle of a microscopic core depletion. The basic APEC methodology is described and color-set problems are defined to determine the APEC functions for burnup-dependent XS and DF corrections. Then the new two-step method was applied to depletion analyses of the SMR without thermal feedback, and its validity was evaluated in terms of being able to predict accurately the reactor eigenvalue and nodal power profile. In addition, four variants of the original SMR core were also analyzed for a further evaluation of the APEC-assisted depletion. In this work, several combinations of the burnup-dependent and -independent XS and DF corrections were also considered. The results show that the APEC method could enhance the nodal equivalence significantly with inexpensive additional costs.

Keywords

References

  1. K.S. Smith, Assembly homogenization techniques for light water reactor analysis, Prog. Nucl. Energy 17 (3) (1986) 303-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-1970(86)90035-1
  2. R.J.J. Stamm'ler, M.J. Abbate, Methods of Steady-State Reactor Physics in Nuclear Design, Academic Press, London, 1983.
  3. J.Y. Cho, K. Lee, J.S. Song, Nuclear design parameter evaluation of 2-step procedure by DeCART for a SMR core, in: Proc. PHYSOR 2018, Cancun, Mexico, April 22-26, 2018.
  4. K.S. Smith, Nodal diffusion methods and lattice physics data in LWR analyses:understanding numerous subtle details, Prog. Nucl. Energy 101 (2017) 360-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.06.013
  5. F. Rahnema, E.M. Nichita, Leakage corrected spatial (assembly) homogenization technique, Ann. Nucl. Energy 24 (6) (1997) 477-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4549(96)00084-9
  6. S.P. Palmtag, Advanced Nodal Method for MOX Fuel Analysis, Thesis (doctoral), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1997.
  7. K.T. Clarno, M.L. Adams, Capturing the effects of unlike neighbors in single-assembly calculations, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 149 (2005) 182-196. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE04-31
  8. J.J. Herrero, N. Garcia-Herranz, D. Cuervo, C. Ahnert, Neighborhood-corrected interface discontinuity factors for multi-group pin-by-pin diffusion calculations for LWR, Ann. Nucl. Energy 46 (2012) 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.03.022
  9. Y.S. Ban, Development of Advanced Leakage Feedback Method for Two-step Core Analyses, Thesis (doctoral), Seoul National University, 2018.
  10. W. Kim, W. Heo, Y. Kim, Improvement of nodal accuracy by using albedo-corrected parameterized equivalence constants, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 188 (2017) 207-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2017.1354592
  11. W. Kim, K. Lee, Y. Kim, Functionalization of the discontinuity factor in the albedo-corrected parameterized equivalence constants (APEC) method, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 192 (2018) 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2018.1497396
  12. M.A. Motalab, W. Kim, Y. Kim, A new two-step methodology for CANDU analysis with the APEC-assisted nodal equivalence theory, Nucl. Tech. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1582942.
  13. M.R. Wagner, K. Koebke, H.-J. Winter, A nonlinear extension of the nodal expansion method, in: Proc. International Topical Meeting on Advances in Mathematical Methods for the Solution of Nuclear Engineering Problems, Munich, Germany, April 27-29, 1981.
  14. J.Y. Cho, et al., DeCART2D v1.0 Methodology Manual, KAERI/TR-5283/2013, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2013.
  15. J.Y. Cho, et al., MASTER-4.0: Multi-Purpose Analyzer for Static and Transient Effects of Reactor, KAERI/TR-6947/2017, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2017.
  16. J.Y. Cho, H.G. Joo, K.S. Kim, S.Q. Zee, Cell based CMFD formulation for acceleration of whole-core method of characteristics calculations, Nucl. Eng. Tech 34 (3) (2002) 250-258.
  17. J.S. Song, et al., PROLOG 1.1 User's Manual, KAERI/UM-4/99, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 1999.
  18. C.B. Shim, K. Lee, J.Y. Cho, Improvement of axial reflector cross section generation model for PWR core analysis, in: Trans. Kor. Nucl. Soc. Autumn Mtg., Gyeongju, Korea, October 27-28, 2016.
  19. J.I. Yoon, H.G. Joo, Two-level coarse mesh finite difference formulation with multigroup source expansion nodal kernels, J. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 45 (7) (2008) 668-682. https://doi.org/10.3327/jnst.45.668
  20. K. Lee, et al., The Nuclear Design Report for SMART Standard Design Cycle 1, KAERI/TR-4622/2012, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2012.

Cited by

  1. A STUDY OF LEAKAGE-CORRECTED TWO-STEP METHOD BASED ON THE NODAL EQUIVALENCE THEORY FOR FAST REACTOR ANALYSIS vol.247, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124702026