References
- J. Hur, E. Althoff, H. Sezen, R. Denning, T. Aldemir, Seismic assessment and performance of nonstructural components affected by structural modeling, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 49 (2) (2017) 387-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.01.004
- T.T. Tran, T.H. Nguyen, D. Kim, Seismic incidence on base-isolated nuclear power plants considering uni-and bi-directional ground motions, J. Struct. Integr. Mainten. 3 (2) (2018) 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2018.1461547
- M. Shinozuka, M.Q. Feng, H. Kim, T. Uzawa, T. Ueda, Statistical Analysis of Fragility Curves, 2003.
- A.S. Pisharady, P.C. Basu, Methods to derive seismic fragility of NPP components: a summary, Nucl. Eng. Des. 240 (11) (2010) 3878-3887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.08.002
- S. Kwag, D. Hahm, Development of an earthquake-induced landslide risk assessment approach for nuclear power plants, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 50 (8) (2018) 1372-1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.07.016
- L. Eads, E. Miranda, H. Krawinkler, D.G. Lignos, An efficient method for estimating the collapse risk of structures in seismic regions, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (1) (2013) 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2191
- A. Bakhshi, P. Asadi, Probabilistic evaluation of seismic design parameters of RC frames based on fragility curves, Sci. Iran. 20 (2) (2013) 231-241.
- M. Kohrangi, D. Vamvatsikos, P. Bazzurro, Site dependence and record selection schemes for building fragility and regional loss assessment, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (10) (2017) 1625-1643. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2873
- N.N. Pujari, T.K. Mandal, S. Ghosh, S. Lala, Optimisation of IDA-based fragility curves, in: Safety, Reliab. Risk Life-cycle Perform. Struct. Infrastructures-proc. 11th Int. Conf. Struct. Saf. Reliab. ICOSSAR 2013, 2013, pp. 4435-4440.
- A.H.M. Muntasir Billah, M. Shahria Alam, Seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges: a state-of-the-art review, Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11 (6) (2015) 804-832. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.912243
- B.R. Ellingwood, Earthquake risk assessment of building structures, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 74 (3) (2001) 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00105-3
- S. Günay, K.M. Mosalam, PEER performance-based earthquake engineering methodology, revisited, J. Earthq. Eng.. 17(6), 829-858. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2013.787377
- I. Zentner, Numerical computation of fragility curves for NPP equipment, Nucl. Eng. Des. 240 (6) (2010) 1614-1621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.02.030
- B.R. Ellingwood, K. Kinali, Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment, Struct. Saf. 31 (2) (2009) 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.001
- S.H. Jeong, A.M. Mwafy, A.S. Elnashai, Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of code-compliant multi-story RC buildings, Eng. Struct. 34 (2012) 527-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.019
- C.B. Haselton, J.W. Baker, A.B. Liel, G.G. Deierlein, Accounting for groundmotion spectral shape characteristics in structural collapse assessment through an adjustment for epsilon, J. Struct. Eng. 137 (3) (2009) 332-344. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000103
- A.K. Kazantzi, D. Vamvatsikos, Intensity measure selection for vulnerability studies of building classes, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (15) (2015) 2677-2694. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2603
- J.W. Baker, C. Allin Cornell, Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (9) (2006) 1077-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.571
- L. Eads, E. Miranda, D.G. Lignos, Average spectral acceleration as an intensity measure for collapse risk assessment, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (12) (2015) 2057-2073. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2575
- S.K. Kunnath, Modeling of reinforced concrete structures for nonlinear seismic simulation, J. Struct. Integr. Mainten. 3 (3) (2018) 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2018.1492669
- P.C. Nguyen, S.E. Kim, Distributed plasticity approach for time-history analysis of steel frames including nonlinear connections, J. Constr. Steel Res. 100 (2014) 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.04.012
- D.K. Kim, F. Wang, S. Chaudhary, Modal energy balance approach for seismic performance evaluation of building structures considering nonlinear behavior, J. Struct. Integr. Mainten. 1 (1) (2016) 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2016.1153309
- M. Vejmelka, M. PALUS, K. SUSMAKOVA, Identification of nonlinear oscillatory activity embedded in broadband neural signals, Int. J. Neural Syst. 20 (02) (2010) 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065710002309
- G. Puscasu, B. Codres, Nonlinear system identification and control based on modular neural networks, Int. J. Neural Syst. 21 (04) (2011) 319-334. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065711002869
- F. Bayramov, C. Tasdemir, M.A. Tasdemir, Optimisation of steel fibre reinforced concretes by means of statistical response surface method, Cement Concr. Compos. 26 (6) (2004) 665-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(03)00161-6
- L.E. Chavez-Valencia, A. Manzano-Ramirez, E. Alonso-Guzman, M.E. Contreras-Garcia, Modelling of the performance of asphalt pavement using response surface methodologydthe kinetics of the aging, Build. Environ. 42 (2) (2007) 933-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.10.013
- R. Brincker, L. Zhang, P. Andersen, Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition, Smart Mater. Struct. 10 (3) (2001), 441. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/303
- R.G. Budynas, J.K. Nisbett, Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, vol. 8, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2008.
- A.I. Khuri, S. Mukhopadhyay, Response surface methodology, Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev.: Comput. Stat. 2 (2) (2010) 128-149. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.73
- B. Sadhukhan, N.K. Mondal, S. Chattoraj, Optimisation using central composite design (CCD) and the desirability function for sorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution onto Lemna major, Karbala Int. J. Modern Sci. 2 (3) (2016) 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kijoms.2016.03.005
- M. Hussan, M.S. Rahman, F. Sharmin, D. Kim, J. Do, Multiple tuned mass damper for multi-mode vibration reduction of offshore wind turbine under seismic excitation, Ocean Eng. 160 (2018) 449-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.04.041
- NUREG, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Seismic Fragility of Nuclear Power Plant Components [PHASE II], NUREG/CR-4659, BNL-NUREG-52007, vols. 2-4, Department of Nuclear Energy, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Long Island, NY, 1987.
- P.P. Cordova, G.G. Deierlein, S.S. Mehanny, C.A. Cornell, Development of a twoparameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure, in: The Second US-Japan Workshop on Performance-based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, 2000, pp. 187-206. September.
- PEER. PEER NGA, Database. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley. California, 2006. http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga/.
- J. Alam, D. Kim, B. Choi, Uncertainty reduction of fragility curve of intake tower using bayesian inference and Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation, Struct. Eng. Mech. 63 (1) (2017) 47-53. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.63.1.047
- M.S. Kircil, Z. Polat, Fragility analysis of mid-rise R/C frame buildings, Eng. Struct. 28 (9) (2006) 1335-1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.004
- R.P. Kennedy, M.K. Ravindra, Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies, Nucl. Eng. Des. 79 (1) (1984) 47-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(84)90188-2
- J.W. Baker, Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis, Earthq. Spectra 31 (1) (2015) 579-599. https://doi.org/10.1193/021113EQS025M
- C.A. Cornell, F. Jalayer, R.O. Hamburger, D.A. Foutch, Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines, J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4) (2002) 526-533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)
- F. Jalayer, R. De Risi, G. Manfredi, Bayesian Cloud Analysis: efficient structural fragility assessment using linear regression, Bull. Earthq. Eng. 13 (4) (2015) 1183-1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9692-z
Cited by
- Earthquake risk assessment of concrete gravity dam by cumulative absolute velocity and response surface methodology vol.17, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.17.5.511
- Application of Tuned Mass Damper to Mitigation of the Seismic Responses of Electrical Equipment in Nuclear Power Plants vol.13, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13020427
- Identifying significant earthquake intensity measures for evaluating seismic damage and fragility of nuclear power plant structures vol.52, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.06.013
- Grouping effect on the seismic response of cabinet facility considering primary-secondary structure interaction vol.52, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.11.024
- Seismic capacity evaluation of NPP electrical cabinet facility considering grouping effects vol.57, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2020.1724206
- Seismic Vulnerability of Cabinet Facility with Tuned Mass Dampers Subjected to High- and Low-Frequency Earthquakes vol.10, pp.14, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144850
- Verification of structural integrity and cooling performance of DRCS cabinet in power plant vol.12, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814020954630
- Seismic Qualification of Electrical Cabinet Using High-Fidelity Simulation under High Frequency Earthquakes vol.12, pp.19, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198048
- Effect of Frequency Content of Earthquake on the Seismic Response of Interconnected Electrical Equipment vol.1, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng1030012
- Embankment Seismic Fragility Assessment under the Near-Fault Pulse-like Ground Motions by Applying the Response Surface Method vol.2021, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8849043
- Seismic capacity evaluation of fire-damaged cabinet facility in a nuclear power plant vol.53, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.09.004
- Optimal Earthquake Intensity Measures for Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models of Base-Isolated Nuclear Power Plant Structures vol.14, pp.16, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14165163
- Probabilistic Seismic Demand Model and Seismic Fragility Analysis of NPP Equipment Subjected to High- and Low-Frequency Earthquakes vol.195, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.1920796