Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Experimental validation of the seismic analysis methodology for free-standing spent fuel racks

  • Received : 2018.07.06
  • Accepted : 2018.12.21
  • Published : 2019.04.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Spent fuel racks are steel structures used in the storage of the spent fuel removed from the nuclear power reactor. Rack units are submerged in the depths of the spent fuel pool to keep the fuel cool. Their free-standing design isolates their bases from the pool floor reducing structural stresses in case of seismic event. However, these singular features complicate their seismic analysis which involves a transient dynamic response with geometrical nonlinearities and fluid-structure interactions. An accurate estimation of the response is essential to achieve a safe pool layout and a reliable structural design. An analysis methodology based on the hydrodynamic mass concept and implicit integration algorithms was developed ad-hoc, but some dispersion of results still remains. In order to validate the analysis methodology, vibration tests are carried out on a reduced scale mock-up of a 2-rack system. The two rack mockups are submerged in free-standing conditions inside a rigid pool tank loaded with fake fuel assemblies and subjected to accelerations on a unidirectional shaking table. This article compares the experimental data with the numerical outputs of a finite element model built in ANSYS Mechanical. The in-phase motion of both units is highlighted and the water coupling effect is detailed. Results show a good agreement validating the methodology.

Keywords

References

  1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, OT position for review and acceptance of spent fuel storage and handling applications. Amended by NRC letter in 1979, 1978.
  2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Standard Review Plan for the review of safety analysis reports for nuclear power plants. Chapter 3-Design of structures, components, equipment and systems. NUREG-0800, formerly issued as NUREG-75/087, 1981.
  3. G. DeGrassi, Review of the technical basis and verification of current analysis methods used to predict seismic response of spent fuel storage racks, NUREG/CR-5912, 1992. BNL-NUREG-52335.
  4. H. Chung, S. Chen, Hydrodynamic mass, United States Government, 1984. CONF-840647d9.
  5. R.J. Fritz, The effect of liquids on the dynamic motions of immersed solids, Journal of engineering for industry (1972) 167-173.
  6. A. Soler, K.P. Singh, Seismic response of a free standing fuel rack construction to 3-D floor motion, Nucl. Eng. Des. 80 (1984) 315-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(84)90272-3
  7. A.I. Soler, K.P. Singh, Dynamic coupling in a closely spaced two-body system vibrating in a liquid medium: the case of fuel racks, 3rd Keswick International conference in nuclear plants, 1982.
  8. A. Gonzalez Merino, L. Costas, A. Gonzalez, Sources of uncertainty in the seismic design of submerged free-standing racks, Energy Procedia 127 (2017) 310-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.114
  9. Instituto de Hidraulica ambiental Cantabria, S.A. Equipos Nucleares, ANSTER - Almacenamiento Nuclear Seguro Ante TERremotos, 2016. Gobierno de Espana, Ministerio de economía, Industria y Competitividad, http://anster.ihcantabria.es/.
  10. K. Fujita, M. Tanaka, M. Nakamura, Y. Tsujikura, Study of the seismic isolated spent fuel storage rack, in: 9th World conference on earthquake engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto (Japan), 1988.
  11. K. Fujita, M. Tanaka, M. Nakamura, Y. Tsujikura, Seismic testing of the baseisolated PWR spent-fuel storage rack, JSME international Journal 3 (1990), 33-3.
  12. A. Iwasaki, Y. Nekomoto, H. Morita, K. Taniguchi, D. Okuno, T. Matsuoka, N. Chigusa, Experimental study on free standing rack loading full fuel assembly, in: ASME Pressure Vessels and piping conference PVP2012-78458, Toronto (Canada), 2012.
  13. S. Kaneko, H. Shirai, Construction of dynamic model for free standing spent fuel rack under seismic excitation, in: Pressure Vessels and piping conference PVP2015-45069, Boston (USA), 2015.
  14. R. Moudrik, J.C. Queval, F. Gantenbein, F. Champomier, C. Trollat, Test and calculations on a scale one spent fuel storage rack, in: Conference on structural mechanics in reactor technology (SMIRT-13) Porto Alegre (Brazil), 1995.
  15. J.C. Queval, P. Sollogoub, F. Champomier, S. Vallat, Seismic behaviour of spent fuel storage racks, in: Conference on structural mechanics in reactor technology (SMIRT-15) Seoul (Korea), 1999.
  16. K. Sakamoto, R. Kan, A. Takai, S. Kaneko, Construction of dynamic model of planar and rocking motion for free standing spent fuel rack, in: ASME pressure vessels and Piping Conference PVP2017-65172, Hawaii (USA), 2017.
  17. Y. Liu, D. Lu, H. Liu, Y. Huang, The shaking table experiments on sliding and overturning of CAP1400 spent fuel storage rack with the effect of FSI, Ann. Nucl. Energy 112 (2018) 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.10.023
  18. G.W. Housner, The dynamic behaviour of water tanks, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 53 (2) (1963) 381-387. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0530020381
  19. Y. Takaki, T. Katsuhiko, J. Kishimoto, A. Iwasaki, Y. Nekomoto, T. Kuga, M. Kameyama, Seismic design of free standing racks in Japanese nuclear power plants, in: ASME Pressure Vessels and piping conference PVP2017-65740 Hawaii (USA), 2017.
  20. A. Iwasaki, Y. Nekomoto, H. Morita, Y. Kishimoto, K. Taniguchi, Y. Takaki, Development of free-standing rack seismic evaluation, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review 53 (2) (2016) 103-107.
  21. A. Iwasaki, Y. Nekomoto, H. Morita, K. Taniguchi, D. Okuno, T. Matsuoka, N. Chigusa, Experimental parameter study on free standing rack, in: ASME Pressure Vessels and piping conference PVP2012-78451, Toronto (Canada), 2012.
  22. ANSYS, Inc, ANSYS Mechanical User's guide, Release 15.0 (2013).
  23. ANSYS, Inc, ANSYS QA2012-01, 2012.
  24. H. Ashar, G. DeGrassi, Design and analysis of free-standing spent fuel racks in nuclear power plants (an overview), in: 10th International conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, (SMiRT-10); CONF-890855d43, BNL-NUREG-42667. Anaheim (USA), 1989.
  25. F. Champomier, J.Y. Peron, Seismic justification of free standing spent fuel storage racks: experimental versus computed behaviour, in: 9th International conference on nuclear engineering (ICONE-9), Nice (France), 2001.
  26. M. Hinderks, H. Ungoreit, G. Kremer, Improved method to demonstrate the structural integrity of high density fuel storage racks, Nucl. Eng. Des. 206 (2001) 177-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(00)00432-5
  27. A. Iwasaki, Y. Nekomoto, H. Morita, K. Taniguchi, D. Okuno, T. Matsuoka, N. Chigusa, Analysis study on free standing rack under the earthquake excitation, in: ASME Pressure Vessels and piping conference PVP2012-78462, Toronto (Canada), 2012.
  28. A. Iwasaki, Y. Nekomoto, H. Morita, K. Taniguchi, D. Okuno, T. Matsuoka, N. Chigusa, Development of seismic design method for free standing rack, in: ASME Pressure Vessels and piping conference PVP2013-97168, Paris (France), 2013.
  29. G.M. Lee, K.S. Kim, K.B. Park, J.K. Park, Three-dimensional seismic analysis for spent fuel storage rack, Journal of the Korean Nuclear Society 30 (1998) 91-98.
  30. Y. Zhao, P.R. Wilson, J.D. Stevenson, Nonlinear 3-D dynamic time history analysis in the reracking modification for a nuclear power plant, Nucl. Eng. Des. 165 (1996) 199-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(96)01197-1
  31. Y. Zhao, Finite element modelling and analysis of nonlinear impact and frictional motion response including fluid-structure coupling effects, Shock Vib. 4 (1997) 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1155/1997/496945
  32. Y. Liu, D. Lu, Y. Wuang, H. Liu, The sliding and overturning analysis of spent fuel storage rack based on dynamic analysis mode, Science and technology of nuclear installation (2016), 8368504.
  33. F. Champomier, R. Delemontey, P. Sollogoub, D. Toumbas, Seismic design of a spent fuel storage rack, in: 10th International conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT-10). CONF-890855, 1989, pp. 589-594. Anaheim (USA).
  34. J. Stabel, M. Ren, H. Swelim, Calculation of seismic loads on fuel storage racks under consideration of fluid-structure interaction, in: International conference on structural mechanics in reactor technology (SMIRT-12). Stuttgart (Germany), 1993.
  35. M. Ren, J. Stabel, Comparison of different analytical formulation for FSI between fuel storage racks, in: International conference on structural mechanics in reactor technology (SMiRT-15). Seoul (Korea), 1999.
  36. J. Stabel, M. Ren, Fluid-structure-interaction for the analysis of the dynamics of fuel storage racks in the case of seismic loads, Nucl. Eng. Des. 206 (2001) 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(00)00431-3
  37. H.M. Hilbert, T.J.R. Hughes, R.L. Taylor, Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 5 (1977) 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290050306
  38. N. Newmark, A method of computation for structural dynamics, J. Eng. Mech. Div. (1959) 67-95.
  39. A. Gonzalez Merino, L. Costas, A. Gonzalez, Influence of the modelling properties on the seismic response of free-standing spent fuel racks, Nucl. Eng. Des. (February 2019) 210-218.
  40. J.D. Stevenson, Structural damping values as a function of dynamic response stress and deformation levels, Nucl. Eng. Des. 60 (1980) 211-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(80)90238-1

Cited by

  1. Investigation of the Equivalent Test Condition for the Seismic Safety Assessment of a Spent Fuel Pool with regard to Sloshing Behavior vol.2019, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1418265
  2. Motion Model of Free-Standing Racks Considering Two-Dimensional Gap Flow vol.144, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052567