Fig. 1. Research systems and procedures
Table 1. Differences in scientific area and humanities area for evaluation
Table 2. Evaluation criteria for online information sources at the University of California at Berkeley’s libraries
Table 3. Evaluation items for information sources at John Hopkins University’s libraries
Table 4. Evaluation criteria for internet data at Georgetown University’s libraries
Table 5. Evaluation criteria for online information at the University of Oregon’s libraries
Table 6. Analysis of the evaluation index for research achievements of humanities professors
Table 7. Reference by item of reliability evaluation index
Table 8. Matters applied in expert opinions for the reliability preliminary evaluation index
Table 9. Institution's own reliability evaluation - final
Table 10. Institution providing service and system reliability evaluation indexes: final
Table 11. Institution's own reliability evaluation index applied: final
Table 12. Final reliability evaluation index applied to the institution provided service and system
Table 13. Final reliability evaluation
References
- Berkeley Library. [n.d.]. Berkeley University Library Evaluating Resources. Retrieved from http://guides.lib.berkeley.edu/evaluating-resources#authority
- Centra, J. A. (1977). How universities evaluate faculty performance: A survey of department heads. Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/GREB-75-05BR.pdf
- Chung, Y. K., & Choi, Y. K. (2011). A Study on Faculty Evaluation of Research Achievements in Humanities and Social Sciences. Journal of Information management, 42(3), 211-233. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.3.211
- Dunsmore, C. (2002). A qualitative study of web-mounted pathfinders created by academic business libraries. Libri, 52(3), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2002.137
- Finkenstaedt, T. (1990). Measuring research performance in the humanities. Scientometrics, 19(5-6), 409-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020703
- Fogg, B. J., Kameda, T., Boyd, J., Marshall, J., Sethi, R., Sockol, M., & Trowbridge, T. (2002). Stanford-Makovsky web credibility study 2002: Investigating what makes web sites credible today. Report from the Persuasive Technology Lab. Retrieved from http://credibility.stanford.edu/pdf/Stanford-MakovskyWebCredStudy2002-prelim.pdf.
- Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D. R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., & Tauber, E. R. (2003, June). How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites?: a study with over 2,500 participants. In Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences (pp. 1-15). ACM.
- Fogg, B. J., & Tseng, H. (1999, May). The elements of computer credibility. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 80-87). ACM. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.83.8354&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- Gang, J. Y., Nam, Y. H., & Oh, H. J. (2017). An Evaluation of Web-Based Research Records Archival Information Services and Recommendations for Their Improvement: NTIS vs. NKIS. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(3), 139-160. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.3.139
- Georgetown Library. [n.d.]. Georgetown University Library Evaluating Internet Resources. Retrieved from https://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/research-guides/evaluating-internet-content
- Jackson, R., & Pellack, L. J. (2004). Internet subject guides in academic libraries: An analysis of contents, practices, and opinions. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 43(4), 319-327.
- Jackson, R., & Stacy-Bates, K. K. (2016). The enduring landscape of online subject research guides. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 55(3), 212.
- Jauch, L. R., & Glueck, W. F. (1975). Evaluation of university professors' research performance. Management Science, 22(1), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.22.1.66
- Jeong, W. C., & Rieh, H. Y. (2016). Users' Evaluation of Information Services in University Archives. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(1), 195-221. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.195
- Johns Hopkins Libraries. [n.d.]. Johns Hopkins University Libraries Evaluating Your Sources. Retrieved from https://guides.library.oregonstate.edu/c.php?g=286235&p=1906707
- Kang, H. I., & Jeong, Y. I. (2002). Measuring Library Online Service Quality: An Application of e-LibQual. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 19(3), 237-261. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2002.19.3.237
- Keum, J. D., & Weon, J. H. (2012). Establishing control system for the credibility of performance information. The Journal of Korean Policy Studies, 12(1), 59-75.
- Kim, D. N., Lee, M. H., & Park, T. G. (2006). Constructing an Evaluation Model for the Professors Academic Achievement in the Humanities. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 19(3), 1-20.
- Kim, H. S., Shin, K. J., & Choi, H. Y. (2007). A Study on the Development of Evaluation Framework for Public Portal Information Services. Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference, 5(1), 440-444.
- Kim, S. (2012). A Study on the Current State of Online Subject Guides in Academic Libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 29(4), 165-189. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.4.165
- Kim, Y. K. (2007a). How Do People Evaluate a Web Sites Credibility. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(3), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.38.3.200709.53
- Kim, Y. K. (2007b). A Study on the Influence of Factors That Makes Web Sites Credible. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 41(4), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2007.41.4.093
- Kim, Y. K. (2011). Comparative Study on Criteria for Evaluation of Internet Information. The Journal of Humanities, 27, 87-109.
- Lee, I. Y. (2005). A Study on the Evaluation System of Research Institutes. The Journal of Educational Administration. 23(4), 343-364.
- Lee, L. J. (2016). A Study on the Improvement Strategies of Moral Education Using Humanities (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
- Lee, Y. H. (2017). A New Evaluating System for Academic Books on Humanities and Social Sciences in Korea. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 17(3), 624-632. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.03.624
- Moed, H. F. (2008, December). Research assessment in social sciences and humanities. In ECOOM Colloquium Antwerp. Retrieved from https://www.ecoom.be/sites/ecoom.be/files/downloads/1%20Lecture%20Moed%20Ecoom%20Antwerp%209%20Dec%202011%20SSH%20aangepast%20(2).pdf
- Noh, Y., & Jeong, D. (2017). A Study to Develop and Apply Evaluation Factors for Subject Guides in South Korea. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(5), 423-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.02.002
- Oregon Libraries. [n.d.]. University of Oregon Libraries Guidelines for evaluating sources. Retrieved from http://diy.library.oregonstate.edu/guidelines-evaluating-sources
- Park, C. K. (2014). Evaluation in the Humanities: A Humanist Perspective. In/Outside, 37, 84-109.
- Park, N. G. (2006). Analysis of the evaluation status of teaching professions by university and development of assessment model of teaching achievement. Seoul: Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development.
- Skolnik, M. (2000). Does counting publications provide any useful information about academic performance?. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(2), 15-25.
- Song, H. H. (2011). Problems on current humanities journal assessment system and the alternatives. Studies of Korean & Chinese Humanities, 34, 457-481.
- Standler, B. R. (2004). Evaluation Credibility of Information on the Internet. Retrieved from http://www.rbs0.com/credible.pdf
- University of Queensland Library. [n.d.]. UQ Library Evaluate Information You Find. Retrieved from https://web.library.uq.edu.au/research-tools-techniques/search-techniques/evaluate-information-you-find
- Woo, B. K., Jeon, I. D., & Kim, S. S. (2006). The Effects of the Academic Research Evaluation System and the Research Achievements in Developed Countries. ICASE Magazine, 12(4), 21-32.
- Yoon, S. W. (1996). Reliability Analysis. Seoul: Jayu academy.