Phonetics and Speech Sciences (말소리와 음성과학)

Korean Society of Speech Sciences (한국음성학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Post-focus compression is not automatically transferred from Korean to L2 English

  • Liu, Jun (Department of English Language and Literature, Cheongju University) ;
  • Xu, Yi (Department of Speech, Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, University College London) ;
  • Lee, Yong-cheol (Department of English Language and Literature, Cheongju University)
  • Received : 2019.04.25
  • Accepted : 2019.06.07
  • Published : 2019.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Korean and English are both known to show on-focus pitch range expansion and post-focus pitch range compression (PFC). But it is not clear if this prosodic similarity would make it easy for Korean speakers to learn English focus prosody. In the present study, we conducted a production experiment using phone number strings to examine whether Korean learners of English produce a native-like focus prosody. Korean learners of English were classified into three groups (advanced, intermediate and low) according to their English proficiency and were compared to native speakers. Results show that intermediate and low groups of speakers did not increase duration, intensity, and pitch in the focus positions, nor did they compress those cues in the post-focus positions. Advanced speakers noticeably increased the acoustic cues in the focus positions to a similar extent as native speakers. However, their performance in post-focus positions was quite far from that of native speakers in terms of pitch and excursion size. These results thus demonstrate a lack of positive transfer of focus prosody from Korean to English in L2 learning, and learners may have to relearn it from scratch, which is consistent with a previous finding. More importantly, the results provide further support for the view proposed in other works that acoustic properties of PFC were not easily transferred from one language to another.

Keywords

References

  1. Alzaidi, M. S., Xu, Y., & Xu, A. (2019). Prosodic encoding of focus in Hijazi Arabic. Speech Communication, 106, 127-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2018.12.006
  2. Chen, Y. (2015). Post-focus compression in English by Mandarin learners. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 0287: 1-5). Glasgow, UK.
  3. Chen, Y., Guion-Anderson, S., & Xu, Y. (2012). Post-focus compression in second language Mandarin. Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2012 (pp. 410-413). Shanghai, China.
  4. Cooper, W. E., Eady, S. J., & Mueller, P. R. (1985). Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77(6), 2142-2156. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392372
  5. de Jong, K. (2004). Stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus in English: Patterns of variation in vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics, 32(4), 493-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.05.002
  6. Fery, C., & Kugler, F. (2008). Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German. Journal of Phonetics, 36(4), 680-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.05.001
  7. Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal, 50(3), 346-363. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810425
  8. Ipek, C. (2011). Phonetic realization of focus with no on-focus pitch range expansion in Turkish. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 140-143). Hong Kong.
  9. Jun, S. A. (1998). The accentual phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology, 15(2), 189-226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675798003571
  10. Jun, S. A. (2011). Prosodic markings of complex NP focus, syntax, and the pre-/post-focus string. Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 28) (pp. 214-230). Los Angeles, CA.
  11. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, H. B. (2013). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package) (R Package Version) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html
  12. Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  13. Lee, A., & Xu, Y. (2012). Revisiting focus prosody in Japanese. Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2012 (pp. 274-277). Shanghai, China.
  14. Lee, Y. (2009). The phonetic realization of contrastive focus and its neighbors in Korean and English: A cross-language study (Master's thesis). Hannam University, Korea.
  15. Lee, Y. (2012). Prosodic correlation between the focusing adverb ozik 'only' and focus/givenness in Korean. Journal of Speech Sciences, 2(2), 85-111. https://doi.org/10.20396/joss.v2i2.15034
  16. Lee, Y. (2015). Prosodic focus within and across languages (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  17. Lee, Y. (2017). Prosodic focus in Seoul Korean and South Kyungsang Korean. Linguistic Research, 34(1), 133-161. https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.34.1.201703.005
  18. Lee, Y., & Xu, Y. (2010). Phonetic realization of contrastive focus in Korean. Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2010 (pp. 100033:1-4). Chicago, IL.
  19. Lee, Y., Nambu, S., & Cho, S. (2018). Focus prosody of telephone numbers in Tokyo Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143(5), EL340-EL346. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5037360
  20. Lee, Y., Wang, B., Chen, S., Adda-Decker, M., Amelot, A., Nambu, S., & Liberman, M. (2015). A crosslinguistic study of prosodic focus. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2015) (pp. 4754-4758). Brisbane, Australia.
  21. Lee, Y., Wang, T., & Liberman, M. (2016). Production and perception of tone 3 focus in Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1058), 1-13.
  22. Nolan, F. (2003). Intonational equivalence: An experimental evaluation of pitch scales. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 771-774). Barcelona, Spain.
  23. Swerts, M., & Zerbian, S. (2010). Prosodic transfer in Black South African English. Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2010 (pp. 100198: 1-4). Chicago, IL.
  24. Ueyama, M., & Jun, S.-A. (1998). Focus realization in Japanese English and Korean English intonation. Japanese and Korean Linguistics 7 (pp. 629-645). Los Angeles, CA.
  25. Wang, B., Wang, L., & Qadir, T. (2011). Prosodic realization of focus in six languages/dialects in China. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 144-147). Hong Kong, China.
  26. Wang, B., Xu, Y., & Ding, Q. (2018). Interactive prosodic marking of focus, boundary and newness in Mandarin. Phonetica, 75(1), 24-56. https://doi.org/10.1159/000453082
  27. Wu, W. L., & Chung, L. (2011). Post-focus compression in English Cantonese bilingual speakers. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 148-151). Hong Kong, China.
  28. Xu, Y. (2011). Post-focus compression: Cross-linguistic distribution and historical origin. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 152-155). Hong Kong, China.
  29. Xu, Y. (2013). ProsodyPro-A Tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (pp. 7-10). Aix-en-Provence, France.
  30. Xu, Y. (2019). Prosody, tone and intonation. In W. F. Katz, & P. F. Assmann (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of phonetics (pp. 314-356). New York, NY: Routledge.
  31. Xu, Y., & Xu, C. X. (2005). Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation. Journal of Phonetics, 33(2), 159-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.11.001
  32. Xu, Y., Chen, S., & Wang, B. (2012). Prosodic focus with and without post-focus compression: A typological divide within the same language family? The Linguistic Review, 29(1), 131-147.