DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Differentiation and Improvement in Arbitration Systems in Construction Disputes

건설분쟁 중재제도의 차별화 및 개선방안에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2019.05.08
  • Accepted : 2019.05.31
  • Published : 2019.06.01

Abstract

The importance of ADR(Alternative Dispute Resolution), which has the advantage of expertise, speed and neutrality due to the increase of arbitration cases due to domestic and foreign construction disputes, has emerged. Therefore, in order for the nation's arbitration system and the arbitration Organization to jump into the ranks of advanced international mediators, it is necessary to research the characteristics and advantages of these arbitration Organization through a study of prior domestic and foreign research and operation of international arbitration Organization. As a problem, First, education for the efficient promotion of arbitrators (compulsory education, maintenance education, specialized education, seminars, etc.). second, The effectiveness of arbitration in resolving construction disputes (hearing methods, composition of the tribunal, and speed). third, The issue of flexibility and diversity of arbitration solutions (the real problem of methodologies such as mediation and arbitration) needs to be drawn on the Arbitration laws and practical problems, such as laws, rules and guidelines. Therefore, Identify the problems presented in the preceding literature and diagnosis of the defects and problems of the KCAB by drawing features and benefits from the arbitration system operated by the international arbitration Institution. As an improvement, the results of an empirical analysis are derived for "arbitrator" simultaneously through a recognition survey. As a method of improvement, First, as an optimal combination of arbitration hearing and judgment in the settlement of construction disputes,(to improve speed). (1) A plan to improve the composition of the audit department according to the complexity, specificity, and magnification of the arbitration cases - (1)Methods to cope with the increased role of the non-lawyer(Specialist, technical expert). (2)Securing technical mediators for each specialized expert according to the large and special corporation arbitration cases. (2) Improving the method of writing by area of the arbitration guidelines, second, Introduction of the intensive hearing system for psychological efficiency and the institutional improvement plan (1) Problems of optimizing the arbitration decision hearing procedure and resolution of arbitration, and (2) Problems of the management of technical arbitrators of arbitration tribunals. (1)A plan to expand hearing work of technical arbitrator(Review on the introduction of the Assistant System as a member of the arbitration tribunals). (2)Improved use of alternative appraisers by tribunals(cost analysis and utilization of the specialized institution for calculating construction costs), Direct management of technical arbitrators : A Study on the Improvement of the Assessment Reliability of the Appraisal and the Appraisal Period. third, Improvement of expert committee system and new method, (1) Creating a non-executive technical committee : Special technology affairs, etc.(Major, supports pre-qualification of special events and coordinating work between parties). (2) Expanding the standing committee.(Added expert technicians : important, special, large affairs / pre-consultations, pre-coordination and mediation-arbitration). This has been shown to be an improvement. In addition, institutional differentiation to enhance the flexibility and diversity of arbitration. In addition, as an institutional differentiation to enhance the flexibility and diversity of arbitration, First, The options for "Med-Arb", "Arb-Med" and "Arb-Med-Arb" are selected. second, By revising the Agreement Act [Article 28, 2 (Agreement on Dispute Resolution)], which is to be amended by the National Parties, the revision of the arbitration settlement clause under the Act, to expand the method to resolve arbitration. third, 2017.6.28. Measures to strengthen the status role and activities of expert technical arbitrators under enforcement, such as the Act on Promotion of Interestments Industry and the Information of Enforcement Decree. Fourth, a measure to increase the role of expert technical Arbitrators by enacting laws on the promotion of the arbitration industry is needed. Especially, the establishment of the Act on Promotion of Intermediation Industry should be established as an international arbitration agency for the arbitration system. Therefore, it proposes a study of improvement and differentiation measures in the details and a policy, legal and institutional improvement and legislation.

Keywords

References

  1. 김갑유, 임수현, 김홍중, 김준우 외, "중재실무강의", 2016. 9.
  2. 대법원(사법정책연구원2016-04), "한국형 대체적분쟁해결(ADR)제도의 발전방향에 관한연구", 2016. 4.
  3. 대법원(사법정책연구원), "중재활성화를 위한 법원의 역할", 2018. 4.
  4. 대법원(사법정책연구원), "영국과 미국의 법관에 의한 중재 및 그 도입 가능성에 관한 연구" 연구총서 2015-10.
  5. 대한상사 중재원, "2017 중재인교육(자료)", 2017.11.
  6. 대한상사중재원, "2017 건설중재 판정사례집", 2017.11.
  7. 마르틴 크릴레(Martin Kriele) 홍성방 옮김, "정의의 판단기준", 유로, 2014. 2.
  8. 서울중앙지방법원 "건설소송실무연구회건설소송실무",유로. 2017. 9.
  9. 손동환, "국제 플랜트 계약과 클레임 강의", 법률출판사, 2016.11.
  10. 윤재윤, "건설분쟁관계법(제6판)", 박영사, 2015. 9.
  11. 임성우, "국제중재", 박영사, 2016. 9.
  12. 임동진, "대안적갈등해결방식(ADR)제도의 운영실태 및 개선방안 연구", KIPA 연구보고서 2012-39, 한국행정연구원
  13. 정원, 정유철, 이강만, "공공계약 판례여행", 건설경제. 2017. 6.
  14. 법무부 중앙대학교 산학협력단, "ADR기본법 제정방향 및 현행 ADR기구의 합리적 운영방안", 2015. 12.
  15. 최진수, "요건사실과 주장증명책임", 진원사, 2013. 6.
  16. 칼 슈미트(Carl Schmitt), 홍성방 옮김, "법률과 판결", 유로, 2014. 2.
  17. Per Molander 저(홍지수 역), "무엇이 불평등을 낳는가, 새로운 현재, 2017. 3.
  18. 강수미, "다수당사자중재에 있어서 중재인 선정방법", 중재연구 제18권제2호, 2008. 8. 2. 한국중재학회 https://doi.org/10.16998/JAS.2008.18.2.33
  19. 강수미, "중재감정계약의 의의 및 법적성질", 중재연구제12권, 2002년 상반기 정기학술발표, 한국중재학회
  20. 김상찬, "중재감정에 관한 비교법적 연구", 중재연구제12권2호, 2002년 상반기 정기학술발표, 한국중재학회
  21. 김상찬, "ICSID 중재판정 취소제도," 중재연구 제25권제4호, 2015. 6. 2. 한국중재학회
  22. 김석철, "한국중재의 영역확대방안에 관한 연구", 중재연구 제20권제3호, 2010. 12. 1. 한국중재학회
  23. 김용진, "중재와 법원 사이의 역할분담과 절차협력 관계(국제적 중재합의의 효력에 관한 다툼과 중재합의관철 방안을 중심으로)", 중재연구 제27권제1호, 2017. 3. 1. 한국중재학회
  24. 김영주, "ASEAN 국가들의 외국중재판정에 관한 승인 및 집행," 중재연구 제25권제4호, 2015. 6. 한국중재학회
  25. 이선재(주저자), 유선봉(교신저자), "잠재적 클레임의 담론과 실제에 관한 연구("공공건설공사를 중심으로")", 공공사회연구지 제16권제3호, 2016. 8. 한국공공사회학회
  26. 이선재, "민사소송사건에서 조정의 성립률향상을 위한 실체적운용방안." 조정마당 열린대화 제9호. 서울중앙지방법원 조정위원협의회
  27. 박원형, 김철호. "중재인선정과 법원의 역할에 관한 연구, 중재연구 제20권제2호, 2010. 8. 2. 한국중재학회
  28. 박종삼, "국제중재인의 자격과 양성방안에 관한 연구", 중재연구 제25권제4호, 2015. 12. 1. 한국중재학회
  29. 박준선, "상사중재활성화를 위한 중재판정부의 임시적 처분 제도에 관한 연구(2016년 개정 중재법을 중심으로)", 중재연구 제26권제2호, 2016. 6. 1. 한국중재학회 https://doi.org/10.16998/JAS.2016.26.2.45
  30. 박철규, "대체적 분쟁해결총론", 2016.8.30. 도서출판 오래
  31. 박철규, "Authrities and Duties of Arbitrators Under the Korean Arbitration Act and the American Arbitration Acts," 중재연구 제16권제1호, 2006. 3. 2. 한국중재학회
  32. 서정일, "조정제도의 통합적 운용방안에 관한 연구", 중재연구 제23권제2호, 2013. 6. 1. 한국중재학회
  33. 신군재, "중재인선정 및 분야별 중재인 특성에 관한 연구". 중재연구 제19권, 제3호, 2009.12. 한국중재학회
  34. 안건형, 비변호사 중재인 활용의 문제점과 개선방안", 중재연구 제25권 제1호, 2015.4. 3. 한국중재학회
  35. 안병희, "중재인의 권한확정권한에 관한 연구", 한국중재학회, 중재연구 제18권제1호, 2008. 3. 2. 한국중재학회
  36. 오원석, 김용일, "ICC중재에서 중재인 선정과 확인에 관한 연구",중재연구 제17권제2호, 2007. 8. 1. 한국중재학회
  37. 윤진기, "2016년 개정 중재법의 중재판정 집행에 관한 문제점",중재연구 제26권제4호, 2016. 12. 1. 한국중재학회 https://doi.org/10.16998/JAS.2016.26.4.43
  38. 이주원, 신군재, "중재인의 중재절차 진행사 유의사항에 관한 연구(대한상사중재원의 절차를 중심으로)", 중재연구 제22권,제1호, 2012. 3. 한국중재학회 https://doi.org/10.16998/JAS.2012.22.1.23
  39. 이태식, 이동욱, 김영현, "건설공사의 분쟁관리와 상사중재", 2003년 동계학술세미나, 한국중재학회
  40. 정용균, "미국의 조정-중재(Med-Arb)제도에 관한 연구", 중재연구 제24권제1호, 2014. 3. 2. 한국중재학회
  41. 한종규, "국제중재의 활성화를 위한 법원의 역할," 법학논집 20권3호, 2016. 이화여자대학교 법학연구소
  42. 최혁준, "중재판정부 구성에 관한 연구(외국의 중재규칙을 중심으로), 중재연구 제16권제1호, 2006. 3. 2. 한국중재학회
  43. Andy Hewitt, Construction Claims & Responses(effective writing & presentation), Wiley Blackwell. 6. 2015.
  44. Cooley John W.(Author), The Mediator's Handbook Paperback-July 1, 2006.
  45. Harvard Law School,"Mediation Secrets for Better Business Negotiations: Top Techniques from Mediation Training Experts - 2008-2018 Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School", 6. 2018.
  46. Long Richard J., P.E, Rod C. Cartet, CCP,PSP. Harold E. Buddemeyer,"Cumulative Impact and Other Dispution Claims in Construction". Long Internation. 2014.
  47. Niemic Robert J. 외 2인, Robert J. Niemic et al., "Guide to Judicial Management of Cases in ADR," Federal Judicial Center. July 1, 2001.
  48. Birkir Kuuld Peetursson. "Disputes and Conflicts within Construction Contracts in the Icelandic Construction Industry "Thesis of 30 ECTS credits Master of Science in Construction Management, January 2015
  49. Patcharang Chaiworamukkul, "Arbitration as an Alternative Means of Settlementof Disputes Arising Out of Thailand's StateContracts Involving Foreign Direct Investments, Golden Gate University School of Law, 11-2009
  50. STACY SINCLAIR, "designing+(dis)assembling disputesan ethnography of disputes & lawyers in the construction industrial", This is an electronic version of a PhD thesis awarded by the University of Westminster. MAY 2016
  51. William Henry Fisher MSc, Dip. Surv (building), Dip. Arb. FRICS (retired), FCIArb(retired). "The use of arbitration in the construction industry in England and Wales: an evaluation of its continuing role following the Arbitration Act 1996" A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Wolverhampton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), NOVEMBER 2017
  52. 국제상업재판소, https://iccwbo.org/contact-us/. 프랑스 파리
  53. 김갑유외, https://www.lawtimes.co.kr/Legal-Info/LawFirm-NewsLetter-view
  54. 대한상사중재원(KCAB), http://www.kcab.or.kr
  55. 미국중재협회(AAA), https://www.adr.org,
  56. 미국중재협회 건설중재분야 Panel, https://www.adr.org/Construction.
  57. 미국중재협회 교육 및 자원 panel, https://www.adr.org/adr-resources. Education & Resources, ADR Resources.
  58. 미국중재협회 조정센터, https://www.aaamediation.org,
  59. 싱가포르국제중재센터(SIAC). http://www.siac.org.sg/
  60. 영국중재법원(LCIA), http://www.lcia.org/
  61. 영국정부, 고등법원 홈페이지, https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations
  62. 영국정부 법원 행정부, https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/h/hm-courts-and-tribunalsservice/about.
  63. 홍콩국제중재센터(HKIAC), http://www.hkiac.org/
  64. Harvard Law School, "Med-Arb, Arb-Med", https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/
  65. ICDR. https://www.icdr.org/about_icdr (미국 국제분쟁해결센터)
  66. AAA, Practice Areas(건설중재분야,수행사례) https://www.adr.org/sites/default/files/document_repository/Construction_Arbitration_Rules_7May2018.pdf
  67. Queen Mary University of London, school of International Arbitration, "2018. International Arbitration Survey:-The Evolution of International Arbitration(국제중재 설문조사 및 통계분석자료)" http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/2018-International-Arbitration-Survey,