Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Policy Recommendation for New Regional Industrial Policy in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era

4차 산업혁명시대의 새로운 지역산업정책방향에 대한 정책제언

  • Lee, Daeshik (Department of Economics, College of Economics and Commerce, Pusan National University)
  • 이대식 (부산대학교 경제통상대학 경제학부)
  • Received : 2019.05.01
  • Accepted : 2019.06.20
  • Published : 2019.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzes the current status and performance of regional industrial policy in the face of the weakening industrial competitiveness under the global trend of the 4th industrial revolution and suggests the policy direction that regional industrial policy as a new national growth strategy. This study focuses on the suggestion of new regional industrial policy framework under new policy environment based on literature review. We propose a new industrial policy framework that simultaneously pursues equality between regions and efficiency within the region at the same time. As a core policy recommendation, we suggest first, establishing the region-centered industrial policy governance, second, strengthening planning function of local government through human resource development and institutionalized national government consulting, and the third, constructing lifestyle industry-ecosystem based on cultural asset and identity of region, fourth, utilizing Smart City, as a platform for participatory innovation, entrepreneurial and capital attraction, and cultivating new industry based on public procurement and data. Main suggestions of this study would be a new guideline coping with the declining industrial competitiveness and the Fouth Industrial Revolution. Details would be necessary.

본 연구는 4차 산업혁명의 글로벌 추세하에서 한국의 산업경쟁력약화라는 현실에 직면하여, 지역산업정책의 현황과 성과를 분석하고 향후 새로운 국가성장전략으로서의 지역산업정책이 지향해야 할 정책방향을 제시하고자 함에 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 본 연구는 문헌연구에 기초하여 변화된 정책환경에 부합되는 새로운 지역산업정책의 틀을 구상함에 주안점을 두었다. 먼저, 큰 틀의 정책방향으로 권역 간 형평과 권역 내 효율의 동시적 추구라는 산업정책틀을 제시한다. 이를 위한 구체적 정책방안으로 첫째, 지역주도 지역산업정책 거버넌스의 구축, 둘째, 인력양성중심, 중앙정부컨설팅을 법제화한 지역산업정책 기획, 셋째, 지역고유의 문화와 정체성에 기초한 라이프 스타일 산업 생태계 조성을 통한 지역전략산업 육성 넷째, 4차 산업혁명기술의 종합시현장인 스마트시티를 참여형 혁신플랫폼, 창업 및 자본유치 플랫폼, 공공조달과 데이터에 기반 한 신산업육성 플랫폼으로 활용할 것을 제안한다. 본 연구는 4차 산업혁명의 전개와 기존산업의 경쟁력 상실이라는 새로운 환경에 대한 대처전략의 제시에 의의가 있으며, 향후 세부적인 실천방안에 대한 추가연구가 요구된다.

Keywords

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_193_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. The Relationship between National Growth and Balanced Development

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_193_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Governance Structure of New Regional Industrial Policy Framework

Table 1. Industry Supporting Agencies By Region

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_193_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Comparison of Local R&D outcomes with National R&D

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_193_t0002.png 이미지

References

  1. K. Schwab. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum
  2. R. Gabriel, H. Fernando, S. Milena & J. Koen. (2017). Place-based Innovation Ecosystems, JRC science for policy report, Luxemburg: EU
  3. D. J. Jackson. (2015). What is an Innovation Ecosystem? National Science Foundation, Arlington : VA.
  4. Y. S. Kim. (2017). Fourth Industrial Revolution and Direction of Regional Industrial Development. Indusrial Economy, 2, KIET, 7-15.
  5. H. Bathelet & P. Cohendet. (2014). The Creation of Knowledge: local building, global accessing and economic development-toward an agenda. Journal of Economic Geography, 14, 869-882. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu027
  6. C. M. Jeong. (2017). Prospects of Urban Structural Change and Policy Agenda in the era of Fourth Industrial Revolution. Planning and Policy, 424, 11-16.
  7. B. Kats & J. Wagner. (2014). The Rise of Innovation Districts: A New Geography of Innovation in America. Brookings
  8. T. Hutton. (2004). The New Economy of the Inner City. Cities, 21(2), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2004.01.002
  9. M. Jaroff, D. Frenchman & F Rojas. (2009). New Century City Developments Creating Extraordinary Value. Cambridge: MIT
  10. D. H. Pink. (2011). A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainners Will Rule the Future. The Daily Telegraphy, UK.
  11. Y. S. Kim, S. B. Kim, H. W. Kim & N. H. Choi. (2015). Industrial Innovation Ecosystem Building Measures in the Korean Region. KIET.
  12. K. Y. Huh. (2016). Evaluation of Regional Industrial Competitiveness Reinforcement Program. National Assembly Budget Office.
  13. D. Lee. (2018). Regional Industrial Competitiveness. Response for Crisis of Korean Industry. 3rd Global Industry Competitiveness Forum, IGIC. Seoul.
  14. K. B. Nam. (2016), The End of 'Selection and Concentration': Towards a New Post-Cluster Regional Industrial Policies. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 19(4), 764-781. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2016.19.4.764
  15. OECD (2016). OECD Regions at a Glance 2016, Paris : OECD Publishing.
  16. S. Jang (2016). Direction of Regional Strategic Industry Development in the Era of the 4th Industrial Revolution. Gwangju-Junnam Yeongu, GERI, 1-27.
  17. S. B. Kim. (2017). New Regional Industrial Development Strategy: Establishment of Smart Regional Innovation Ecosystem. KIET Industrial Economy, 04, 65-73.
  18. S. J. Kim. (2017). Establishment of Self-Directed Regional R&D Innovation System by Decentralization. Issue Weekly, KISTEP, 215, 1-22.
  19. J. R. Mo. (2018). The Future of City and Commercial Sphere. PPT presentation Yonsei Univ.
  20. K. B. Kim, G. C. Kim & H. J. Cho. (2018). Status and Prospects of Smart City in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(9), 191-197. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.9.191
  21. L. Errichiello & A. Marasco. (2014). Open Service Innovation in Smart Cities: A framework for Exploring Innovation Networks in the Development of New City Services. Advanced Engineering, 11, 115-124
  22. N. Walravens, J. Breuer & P. Ballon. (2014). Open Data as a Catalyst for the Smart City as a Local Innovation Platform. Digital Economic Journal, 96(4), 15-33.
  23. K. A. Paskaleva. (2011). The Smart City: A nexus of Open Innovation?. Intelligent Building International, 3(3), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2011.586672