디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제17권6호
  • /
  • Pages.177-184
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

공유리더십이 심리적 임파워먼트와 조직공정성 및 몰입에 미치는 영향요인

Effects of Shared Leadership, Psychological Empowerment and Organizational Justice on Organizational Commitment

  • Park, Eun-Mi (School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Seo, Joung-Hae (School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.04.30
  • 심사 : 2019.06.20
  • 발행 : 2019.06.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

현대 기업경영의 환경은 수평적 조직 구조화와 팀제도의 확산 등으로 많은 변화를 겪고 있는 가운데, 기존의 개인적 차원의 리더십을 넘어 구성원 모두가 함께 지향할 수 있는 집단적 리더십의 중요성이 날로 커져가고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 공유리더십이 심리적 임파워먼트와 조직공정성 및 조직몰입에 미치는 영향을 구조방정식 도구인 PLS를 사용하여 분석을 수행하였다. 분석 결과 첫째, 공유리더십은 심리적 임파워먼트와 조직공정성에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다. 둘째, 심리적 임파워먼트는 조직공정성과 조직몰입에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤으며, 마지막으로 조직공정성은 조직몰입에 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 있음을 확인할 수 있었다. 본 연구는 공유리더십과 심리적 임파워먼트 및 조직공정성 그리고 조직몰입과의 중요한 인과관계를 파악하고자 하였으며, 본 연구의 결과는 공유리더십, 심리적 임파워먼트, 조직공정성간의 중요성과 영향 요인들이 조직몰입을 높일 수 있는 가이드라인을 제공할 것으로 기대한다.

The environment of modern corporate management is undergoing many changes due to the horizontal organizational structure and the spread of team system. The importance of collective leadership that all members can pursue together beyond the existing personal leadership is increasing day by day. This study was conducted to analyze the effects of shared leadership on psychological empowerment, organizational justice and organizational commitment using PLS, a structural equation tool. The analysis highlighted the following. First, shared leadership exerted positive effects on psychological empowerment and organizational justice. Second, psychological empowerment exerted positive effects on organizational justice and organizational commitment and lastly, organizational justice exerted positive effects on organizational commitment. The causality between shared leadership, psychological empowerment, organizational justice and organizational commitment. This study demonstrated the important relationship between shared leadership and psychological empowerment and organizational justice, which will serve as a guideline for further organizational commitment.

키워드

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_177_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Research Models

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_177_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Hypotheses Testing

Table 1. Discriminant Validity Analysis

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_177_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Correlation between Latent Variable

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_177_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Hypotheses Testing

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_177_t0003.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Kim, Y. K. & Park, S. T. (2018). Impacts of Innovation Motives and Activities on Innovation Performance. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 9(8).
  2. Park, S. T., Choi, S, M. & Kim, Y. K. (2017). Effects of Patent Infringement Response Activities and Patent-based Activities on Corporate Image and Management Performance. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research. 15(2), 119-127.
  3. Perry, M. L., Pearce, C. L. & Sims Jr, H. P. (1999). Empowered selling teams: How shared leadership can contribute to selling team outcomes. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 19(3), 35-51.
  4. Hoch, J. E. & Dulebohn, J. H. (2013). Shared leadership in enterprise resource planning and human resource management system implementation. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.06.007
  5. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
  6. Suazo, M. M. (2003). An examination of antecedents and consequences of psychological contract breach (Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning).
  7. Pearce, C. L. & Manz, C. C. (2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: The importance of self-and shared leadership in knowledge work.
  8. Pearce, C. L. & Conger, J. A. (2002). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Sage.
  9. Jackson, S. E., DeNisi, A., & Hitt, M. A. (Eds.). (2003). Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage: Designing strategies for effective human resource management (Vol. 21). John Wiley & Sons.
  10. Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E. & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of management Journal, 50(5), 1217-1234. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159921
  11. Sanders, T. O. (2006). Collectivity and influence: The nature of shared leadership and its relationship with team learning orientation, vertical leadership and team effectiveness. ProQuest.
  12. Pearce, C. L. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.12690298
  13. Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of management review, 13(3), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306983
  14. Kizilos, P. (1990). Crazy about Empowerment?. Training, 27(12).
  15. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
  16. Gandz, J., & Bird, F. G. (1996). The ethics of empowerment. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(4), 383-392. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380359
  17. Thomas, K. W. & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management review, 15(4), 666-681. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1990.4310926
  18. Tymon, W. G. (1988). An empirical investigation of a cognitive model of empowerment (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University).
  19. Murphy, S. M., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C. & Erdogan, B. (2003). Understanding social loafing: The role of justice perceptions and exchange relationships. Human relations, 56(1), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726703056001450
  20. Adams, V. H., Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., King, E. A., Sigmon, D. R. & Pulvers, K. M. (2002). Hope in the workplace. Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance, 367-377.
  21. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of applied psychology, 86(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
  22. Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W. & Steers, R. M. (2013). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic press.
  23. Brown, M. E. (1969). Identification and some conditions of organizational involvement. Administrative science quarterly, 346-355.
  24. Bateman, T. S. & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee "citizenship". Academy of management Journal, 26(4), 587-595. https://doi.org/10.2307/255908
  25. Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human resource management review, 1(1), 61-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
  26. Mathieu, J. E. & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological bulletin, 108(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171
  27. Yukl, G. A. (1998). Leadership in organizations. Pearson Education India.
  28. Konovsky, M. A. & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 656-669. https://doi.org/10.2307/256704
  29. Thomas, K. W. & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management review, 15(4), 666-681. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1990.4310926
  30. Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of management review, 13(3), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306983
  31. Orpen, C. (1993). The effect of organizational cultural norms on the relationships between personnel practices and employee commitment. The Journal of psychology, 127(5), 577-579. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1993.9914896
  32. Konovsky, M. A. & Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of applied psychology, 76(5), 698. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.698
  33. Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
  34. Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling.
  35. Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H. & Berge, J. M. T. (1967). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226). New York: McGraw-hill.
  36. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  37. Thompson, R., Barclay, D. W. & Higgins, C. A. (1995). The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology studies: special issue on research methodology, 2(2), 284-324.
  38. Chin, W. W. & Todd, P. A. (1995). On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution. MIS quarterly, 237-246.
  39. Falk, R. F. & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.