DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Oroantral fistula after a zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture

  • Ahn, Seung Ki (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Wee, Syeo Young (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2019.02.23
  • 심사 : 2019.05.23
  • 발행 : 2019.06.20

초록

Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures account for a substantial proportion of trauma cases. The most frequent complications of maxillofacial fracture treatment are infections and soft tissue flap dehiscence. Postoperative infections nearly always resolve in response to oral antibiotics and local wound care. However, a significant infection can cause a permanent fistula. A 52-year-old man visited our clinic to treat an oroantral fistula (OAF), which was a late complication of a ZMC fracture. Postoperatively, the oral suture site dehisced, exposing the absorbable plate. However, he did not seek treatment. After 5 years, an OAF formed with a $2.0{\times}2.0cm$ bony defect on the left maxilla. We completely excised the OAF, harvested a piece of corticocancellous bone from the iliac crest, inserted the harvested bone into the defect, and covered the soft tissue defect with a buccal mucosal transposition flap. Although it is necessary to excise OAFs, the failure rate is higher for large OAFs (> 5 mm in diameter) because of the extensive defect in the underlying bone that supports the overlying flap. Inappropriate management of postoperative wounds after a ZMC fracture can lead to disastrous outcomes, as in this case. Therefore, proper postoperative treatment and follow-up are essential.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Erol B, Tanrikulu R, Gorgun B. Maxillofacial fractures: analysis of demographic distribution and treatment in 2901 patients (25-year experience). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004;32:308-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2004.04.006
  2. Borgonovo AE, Berardinelli FV, Favale M, Maiorana C. Surgical options in oroantral fistula treatment. Open Dent J 2012;6:94-8. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601206010094
  3. Ehrl PA. Oroantral communication. Epicritical study of 175 patients, with special concern to secondary operative closure. Int J Oral Surg 1980;9:351-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(80)80059-7
  4. del Rey-Santamaria M, Valmaseda Castellon E, Berini Aytes L, Gay Escoda C. Incidence of oral sinus communications in 389 upper thirmolar extraction. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006;11:E334-8.
  5. Awang MN. Closure of oroantral fistula. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;17:110-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(88)80162-0
  6. Guven O. A clinical study on oroantral fistulae. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998;26:267-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(98)80024-3
  7. Yalcin S, Oncu B, Emes Y, Atalay B, Aktas I. Surgical treatment of oroantral fistulas: a clinical study of 23 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:333-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.061
  8. Hanazawa Y, Itoh K, Mabashi T, Sato K. Closure of oroantral communications using a pedicled buccal fat pad graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:771-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90329-1
  9. Hajiioannou J, Koudounarakis E, Alexopoulos K, Kotsani A, Kyrmizakis DE. Maxillary sinusitis of dental origin due to oroantral fistula, treated by endoscopic sinus surgery and primary fistula closure. J Laryngol Otol 2010;124:986-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215110001027
  10. Isler SC, Demircan S, Cansiz E. Closure of oroantral fistula using auricular cartilage: a new method to repair an oroantral fistula. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;49:e86-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.03.262
  11. ElShourbagy MH, Hussein MM, Khedr MS, Elal SA. Oroantral communication repair using bone substitute and platelets rich fibrin. Tanta Dental J 2015;12:65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tdj.2014.12.001