Figure 1. Floor plan of a conventional EMP shielding facility[9]
Figure 2. Mechanism of EMP shielding
Figure 3. Specification of the name of specimens
Figure. 4. Specimens of EMP shielding concrete
Figure 5. Diagram of ATMSM[23]
Figure 6. ATMSM procedure using Zn-Al wire
Figure 7. Set up of experimental specimen
Figure 8. Results of total specimens
Figure 9. The increment of SE by ATMSM
Figure 10. Shielding effectiveness of ATMSM specimens
Table 1. Experimental variables
Table 2. Mix proportion of concrete
Table 3. Physical properties of total specimens
Table 4. Shielding effectiveness of non-ATMSM specimens
Table 5. Shielding effectiveness of total specimens
Table 6. The increment of SE by ATMSM
References
- IEC 61000-2-9. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 2: Environment - Section 9: Description of HEMP environment - Radiated disturbance. International Electrotechnical Commission; 1996. 49 p.
- Kim HS. Truth of EMP threat and development plan. Defence Tech. 2013 Aug;414:98-103.
- Savage E, Gilbert J, Radasky W. The Early-Time (E1) High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) and Its Impact on the U.S. Power Grid. Goleta (CA): Metatech Corporation; 2010 Jan. 168 p. Report No.: Meta-R-320. Contract No.: 6400009137. Supported by Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
- Gurevich V. Protection of substation critical equipment against intentional electromagnetic threats. London: Wiley; 2017. 240 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119271444
- Foster JS, Gjelde E, Graham WR, Hermann RJ, Kluepfel HM, Lawson RL, Soper GK, Wood LL, Woodard JB. Report of the commission to assess the threat to the United States from electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack. Virginia: Electromagnetic Pulse(EMP) Commission; 2008. 208 p.
- MIL-STD-188-125-1. High-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) protection for ground-based C41 facilities performing critical, time-urgent missions - part 1 fixed facilities. Department of Defense Interface Standard; 2005. 106 p.
- IEEE-299. IEEE Standard Method for Measuring the Effectiveness of Electromagnetic Shielding Enclosures. IEEE Standards Association; 2006. 50 p. https://doi.org/10.1109/ieeestd.2007.323387
- Kim YS, Choi IK, Kim SS. Analysis of electromagnetic wave shielding effectiveness from electrical conductivity of metalized conductive sheets. Korean Journal of Materials Research. 1999 Aug;9(9):913-8.
- Lee HS, Choe HB, Baek IY, Singh JK, Ismail MA. Study on the shielding effectiveness of an arc thermal metal spraying method against an electromagnetic pulse. Materials. 2017 Oct;10(10):1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10101155
- Nam IW, Kim HK, Lee HK. Influence of silica fume additions on electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of multi-walled carbon nanotube/cement composites. Construction and Building Materials. 2012 May;30:480-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.025
- Kim HK, Nam IW, Lee HK. Enhanced effect of carbon nanotube on mechanical and electrical properties of cement composites by incorporation of silica fume. Composite Structures. 2014 Jan;107:60-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.042
- Khushnood RA, Ahmad S, Savi P, Tulliani JM, Giorcelli M, Ferro GA. Improvement in electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of cement composites using carbonawceous nano/micro inerts. Construction and Building Materials. 2015 Jun;85:208-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.069
- Cao J, Chung DDL. Colloidal graphite as an admixture in cement and as a coating on cement for electromagnetic interference shielding. Cement and Concrete Research. 2003 Nov;33(11): 1737-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-8846(03)00152-2
- Wu J, Chung DDL. Improving colloidal graphite for electromagnetic interference shielding using 0.1 lm diameter carbon filaments. Carbon. 2003 Jan;41(6):1313-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6223(03)00033-2
- Chung DDL. Exfoliation of graphite. Journal of Materials Science. 1987 Dec;22(12):4190-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01132008
- Chung DDL. Review graphite. Journal of Materials Science. 2002 Apr;37(8):1475-89. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014915307738
- Luo X, Chung DDL. Electromagnetic interference shielding reaching 130 dB using flexible graphite. Carbon. 1996 Jan;.34 (10):1293-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(96)82798-9
- Kim YJ, Yeman DM, Kim BJ, Yi CK. Effect of fiber geometry on the electromagnetic shielding performance of mortar. Computers and Concrete. 2016 Feb;17(2):281-94. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2016.17.2.281
- Wen S, Chung DDL. Electromagnetic interference shielding reaching 70 dB in steel fiber cement. Cement and Concrete Research. 2004 Feb;34(2):329-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.08.014
- KS F 2405. Standard test method for compressive strength of concrete. Seoul(Korea). Korea Standard; 2017. 12 p.
- KS L 5201. Portland cement. Seoul(Korea). Korea Standard; 2016. 16 p.
- KS F 2403. Standard test method for making and curing concrete specimens. Seoul(Korea). Korea Standard; 2014. 14 p.
- Lee HS, Park JH, Singh JK, Ismail MA. Protection of reinforced concrete structures of waste water treatment reservoirs with stainless steel coating using arc thermal spraying technique in acidified water. Materials. 2016 Apr;9(9):1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9090753
- ASTM D 4935. Standard test method for measuring the electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of planar materials. PA: American Society of Testing Materials; 2010. 11 p. https://doi.org/10.1520/d4935-10
- Chung YC, Kang TW, Chung NS. Electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of the composite materials in the far field region. Electromagnetic Wave Technology. 1994 Mar;5(1):31-9.