DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Crown Shape and Amount of Tooth Reduction for Primary Anterior Prefabricated Crowns

유전치 기성 크라운의 형태 및 치질 삭제량 비교

  • Kim, Soyoung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lim, Youjin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Sangho (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Nanyoung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jih, Myeongkwan (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 김소영 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 임유진 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이상호 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이난영 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 지명관 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2018.07.20
  • Accepted : 2018.09.13
  • Published : 2019.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain instructions for size selection of prefabricated crown and tooth reduction by 3-dimensional analysis of the size and shape of the maxillary primary central and lateral incisors and prefabricated crowns (celluloid strip, resin veneered stainless steel, and zirconia crowns). The maxillary primary central and lateral incisors of 300 Korean children was scanned with three types of prefabricated crown to create standard three-dimensional tooth models and prefabricated crowns. The shapes of the prefabricated crowns and natural teeth were compared according to four parameters (mesio-distal width, height, labio-palatal width, and labial surface curvature coefficient) and calculated the amount of tooth reduction required for each prefabricated crown. The size 2 resin veneered stainless steel crown, size 1 zirconia crown, and size 2 celluloid strip crown were most similar in shape to the primary central incisor. The size 3 rein veneered stainless steel crown, size 2 zirconia crown, and size 3 celluloid strip crown were most similar to the primary lateral incisor. The amount of tooth reduction was similar in both maxillary primary central and lateral incisors. The incisal reduction was greatest for the zirconia crown. At the proximal surface, the zirconia and celluloid strip crowns required a similar amount of tooth reduction, but more than the resin veneered stainless steel crown. The labial surface reduction was greatest for the zirconia crown. The degree of lingual surface reduction was not significant among the three prefabricated crowns. Among the assessment parameters, mesio-distal crown width was the most important for choosing a prefabricated crown closest to the actual size of the natural crown.

이 연구의 목적은 임상에서 많이 사용되고 있는 3종의 기성 크라운 즉, 레진관, 레진피복 금속관, 지르코니아 크라운의 크기와 형태를 3차원적으로 계측하여 자연치와 비교함으로써 기성 크라운의 크기 선택과 치질 삭제량에 대한 지침을 얻고자 하는데 있다. 300개의 유전치 석고모델과 3종의 기성 크라운을 대상으로 3D 스캐너와 컴퓨터 이미지 프로그램으로 3차원적 모델을 만들었다. 3차원 모델에서 치관의 근원심 너비, 치관 높이, 치관 ratio, 순면의 곡률반경 등 4가지 평가 척도에 의해 각 기성 크라운별로 한국인 자연치 표준모형과 가장 유사한 형태를 고르고 이를 기준으로 치질 삭제량을 비교, 평가하였다. 유중절치의 경우 기성 크라운별로 레진피복 금속관은 2번, 지르코니아 크라운은 1번, 레진관은 2번이, 유측절치의 경우 레진피복 금속관은 3번, 지르코니아 크라운은 2번, 레진관은 3번이 가장 유사한 형태를 보였다. 치아 삭제량은 상악 유중절치와 유측절치에서 같은 양상을 보였다. 절단연에서는 지르코니아 크라운의 삭제량이 가장 컸다. 인접면은 지르코니아 크라운과 레진관이 비슷한 삭제량을 보였으며 레진피복 금속관에 비해서 컸다. 순면 역시 지르코니아 크라운이 유중절치와 유측절치에서 삭제량이 가장 컸다. 설면의 경우 순면에 비해 전체적으로 삭제량이 적었으며 3종류의 기성 크라운 간에 삭제량 차이도 크지 않았다. 크라운의 형태를 비교하기 위한 4가지 평가 척도 중 치관의 근원심 너비가 기성 크라운의 크기를 선택하는데 가장 중요한 척도로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Waggoner WF : Restoring primary anterior teeth: updated for 2014. Pediatr Dent, 37:163-170, 2015.
  2. Lopez-Loverich AM, Garcia MM, Donly KJ : Retrospective study of retention of stainless steel crowns and preveneered crowns on primary anterior teeth. Pediatr Dent, 37:530-534, 2015.
  3. Lee JM, Lee HS, Choi SC, et al. : Three dimensional analysis of primary maxillary central and lateral anterior zirconia crown. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 43:176-186, 2016.
  4. Park JH, Lee SH, Lee NY, Jih MK : A morphometric study of primary anterior zirconia crowns in Korean models. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 45:41-56, 2018.
  5. Clark L, Wells MH, Harris EF, Lou J : Comparison of amount of primary tooth reduction required for anterior and posterior zirconia and stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent, 38:42-46, 2016.
  6. Baik BJ, Jeon SH, Kim JG, Kim YS : A study on the size of the deciduous teeth. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 29:382-388, 2002.
  7. Kim SR, Kim CM, Kim JH, et al. : Evaluation of accuracy and repeatability using CBCT and a dental scanner by means of 3D software. Int J Comput Dent, 20:65-73, 2017.
  8. Axelsson G, Kirveskari P : Crown size of deciduous teeth in Icelanders. Acta Odont Scand, 42:339-343, 1984. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358409033613
  9. Margetts B, Brown T : Crown diameters of the deciduous teeth in Australian Aboriginals. Am J Phys Anthropol, 48:493-502, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330480408
  10. Liu HH, Dung SZ, Yang YH : Crown diameters of the deciduous teeth of Taiwanese. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 16:299-307, 2000.
  11. de Almeida Anfe TE, Arakaki Y, Nakamura DM, Vieira GF : Mesiodistal and buccolingual crown size of deciduous teeth from a tooth bank in Brazil. Braz Dent Sci, 15:74-78, 2012.
  12. Venkataraghavan K, Chan J, Karthik S : Polycarbonate crowns for primary teeth revisited: restorative options, technique and case reports. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 32:156-159, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.130981
  13. Castro A, Badr SB, El-Badrawy W, Kulkarni G : Clinical performance of pedo jacket crowns in maxillary anterior primary teeth. J Dent Child (Chic), 83:125-131, 2016.
  14. Park SH, Noh BD, Ahn HJ, Kim HK : Celluloid strip-finished versus polished composite surface: difference in surface discoloration in microhybrid composites. J Oral Rehabil, 31:62-66, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01206.x
  15. Walia T, Salami AA, Rashid F, et al. : A randomised controlled trial of three aesthetic full-coronal restorations in primary maxillary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 15:113-118, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-013-0072-1