대한물리의학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine)

  • 제14권2호
  • /
  • Pages.97-105
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1975-311X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7215(eISSN)
대한물리의학회 (The Korean Society of Physical Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

경직성 뇌성마비가 있는 학령기 아동의 학교기반 신체 활동수행력에 영향을 주는 요인

Predictors Related to Activity Performance of School Function Assessment in School-aged Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy

  • 투고 : 2019.01.08
  • 심사 : 2019.04.03
  • 발행 : 2019.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE: This study examined the factors related to school-based activity performance in school-aged children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: The Gross Motor Function Systems (GMFCS), Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) as functional classifications, and the physical activity performance of the School Function Assessment (SFA) were measured in 79 children with spastic CP to assess the student's performance of specific school-related functional activities. RESULTS: All the function classification systems were correlated significantly with the physical activity performance of the SFA ($r_s=-.47$ to -.80) (p<.05). The MACS (${\beta}=-.59$), GMFCS (${\beta}=-.23$), CFCS (${\beta}=-.21$), and age (${\beta}=-.15$) in order were predictors of the physical activity performance of the SFA (84.8%)(p<.05). CONCLUSION: These functional classification systems can be used to predict the school-based activity performance in school-aged children with CP. In addition, they can contribute to the selection of areas for intensive interventions to improve the school-based activity performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barnes D, Linton JL, Sullivan E, et al. Pediatric outcomes data collection instrument scores in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy: an analysis by age groups and severity level. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(1):97-102. https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0b013e31815a60e6
  2. Case-Smith J. Occupational Therapy for Children (5th ed). Mosby. 2005.
  3. Coleman A, Weir KA, Ware RS, et al. Relationship between communication skills and gross motor function in preschool-aged children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(11):2210-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.025
  4. Compagnone E, Maniglio J, Camposeo S, et al. Functional classifications for cerebral palsy: correlations between the gross motor function classification system (GMFCS), the manual ability classification system (MACS) and the communication function classification system (CFCS). Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(11):2651-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.005
  5. Coster WJ, Deeney T, Haltiwanger J, et al. School Function Assessment, User's manual. San Antonio : Psychological Corp. 1998.
  6. Davies PL, Soon PL, Young M, et al. Validity and reliability of the school function assessment in elementary school students with disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2004;24(3):23-43. https://doi.org/10.1300/J006v24n03_03
  7. Effgen SK, McCoy SW, Chiarello LA, et al. Outcomes for students receiving school-based physical therapy as measured by the school function assessment. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2016;28(4):371-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000279
  8. Eliasson AC, Krumlinder-Sundholm L, Rosblad B, et al. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for chidren with cerebral palsy: Scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(7):549-54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162206001162
  9. Gates PE, Otsuka NY, Sanders JO, et al. Relationship between parental PODCI questionnaire and School Function Assessment in measuring performance in children with CP. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(9):690-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03011.x
  10. Gray L, Ng H, Bartlett D. The gross motor function classification system: an update on impact and clinical utility. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010;22(3):315-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181ea8e52
  11. Gunel MK, Mutlu A, Tarsuslu T, et al. Relationship among the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and the functional status (WeeFIM) in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Eur J Pediatr. 2009;168(4):477-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-008-0775-1
  12. Hidecker MJ, Paneth N, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System for individuals with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(8):704-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03996.x
  13. Himmelmann K, Lindh K, Hidecker MJ. Communication ability in cerebral palsy: a study from the CP register of western Sweden. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2013;17(6):568-74 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2013.04.005
  14. Howard J, Soo B, Graham HK, et al. Cerebral palsy in Victoria: motor types, topography and gross motor function. J Paediatr Child Health. 2005;41(9-10):479-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2005.00687.x
  15. Huang CY, Tseng MH, Chen KL, et al. Determinants of school activity performance in children with cerebral palsy: a multidimensional approach using the ICF-CY as a framework. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(11):4025-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.08.022
  16. Hwang JL, Davies PL. Rasch analysis of the School Function Assessment provides additional evidence for the internal validity of the activity performance scales. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63(3):369-73. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.63.3.369
  17. Jain A, Sponseller PD, Shah SA, et al. Subclassification of GMFCS Level-5 cerebral palsy as a predictor of complications and health-related quality of life after spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(21):1821-8. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.01359
  18. Majnemer A, Shevell M, Law M, et al. Participation and enjoyment of leisure activities in school-aged children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(10):751-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03068.x
  19. Malt MA, Aarli A, Bogen B, et al. Correlation between the Gait Deviation Index and gross motor function (GMFCS level) in children with cerebral palsy. J Child Orthop. 2016;10(3):261-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0738-4
  20. Morris C, Barlett D. Gross motor function classification system: Impact and utility. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46(1):660-5.
  21. Ohrvall AM, Eliasson AC, Lowing K, et al. Self-care and mobility skills in children with cerebral palsy, related to their manual ability and gross motor function classifications. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(11):1048-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03764.x
  22. Palisano RJ, Hanna SE, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Validation of a model of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2000;80(10):974-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.10.974
  23. Park EY, Kim WH. Relationship between activity limitations and participation restriction in school-aged children with cerebral palsy. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015a;27(8):2611-4. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2611
  24. Park EY, Kim WH. Relationship between function classification systems and the PEDI functional sills in children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther Kor. 2014;21(3):55-62. https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2014.21.3.055
  25. Park EY, Kim WH. Relationship between the gross motor function classification system and functional outcomes in children with cerebral palsy. Indian J Sci Technol. 2015b;8(18):75902-7.
  26. Park EY, Lee YJ, Kim WH. Reliability of the manual ability classification system for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther Kor. 2010;17(1):62-8.
  27. Parkes J, Hill N, Platt MJ, et al. Oromotor dysfunction and communication impairments in children with cerebral palsy: a register study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(12):1113-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03765.x
  28. Paulson A, Vargus-Adams J. Overview of Four Functional Classification Systems Commonly Used in Cerebral Palsy. Children (Basel). 2017;4(4).
  29. Pfeifer LI, Silva DB, Funayama CA, et al. Classification of cerebral palsy: association between gender, age, motor type, topography and Gross Motor Function. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2009;67(4):1057-61. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2009000600018
  30. Rabinovich RV, Patel NV, Gates PE, et al. The Relationship between the School Function Assessment (SFA) and the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) in Ambulatory Patients with Cerebral Palsy. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2015;73(3):204-9.
  31. Rosenbaum P. Cerebral palsy in the 21st century: is there anything left to say? Neuropediatrics. 2009;40(2):56-60. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1234104
  32. Schenker R, Coster W, Parush S. Participation and activity performance of students with cerebral palsy within the school environment. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(10):539-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280400018437
  33. Sin YN, Park SH, Lee JY, et al. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the school function assessment. Korean J Soc Occup Ther. 2014;22(4):27-37.
  34. van Gorp M, Van Wely L, Dallmeijer AJ, et al. Long-term course of difficulty in participation of individuals with cerebral palsy aged 16 to 34 years: a prospective cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(2):194-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14004
  35. Wood E, Rosenbaum P. The gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy: a study of reliability and stability over time. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42(5):292-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162200000529