Table 1. The Criteria for selecting scientists
Table 2. Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Davis, 1980)
Table 3. Empathy factors related to problem-solving steps
Table 4. An example of a professional questionnaire for the validation of the content validity of empathic cases in the problem solving situation of scientists (Lynn, 1986)
Table 5. Empathy element of Scientist extracted through critical incident technique analysis
Table 6. The active and passive empathy elements extracted from the problem-solving situation of scientists
Table 7. The personal and interpersonal empathy elements extracted from the problem-solving situation of scientists
References
- Basadur, M. (1994). Managing the creative process in organizations. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 237-268). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Blair, R. J. R. (2005). Responding to the emotions of others: dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Consciousness and cognition, 14(4), 698-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.06.004
- Bowler, P. J.(1990). Charles Darwin: The Man and His Influence.Cambridge University Press.
- Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S., and Krajcik, J. (2011). Reconceptualization of Scientific Literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
- Chun, O., Yang, H., & Kang, S. J. (2018). Exploration of empathy factors in the science and development of related scales. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1-23.
- Cox, C. M. (1983). The early mental traits of 300 geniuses. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence: The social psychology of creativity and exceptional achievement (pp. 46-51). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
- Crombie, A. C. (1990). Science, optics, and music in medieval and early modern thought. A&C Black.
- Davis, M. H., & American Psychological Association. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Retrieved from https://www.uv.es/friasnav/Davis_1980.pdf.
- Darwin, C. (1887). The Autobiography of Charles Darwin. Barnes & Noble Publishing.
- Desmond, A., & Moore, J. (2009). Darwin's sacred cause: race, slavery and the quest for human origins. Penguin UK.
- Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational researcher, 23(7), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176933
- Dunbar, K. (2000). How scientists think in the real world: Implications for science education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00050-7
- Duckworth, E. (2001). Inventing density. In E. Duckworth (Ed.), "Tell me more": Listening to learners explain(pp. 1 - 41). New York, NY: Teacher's College Press. (Original work published 1986)
- Egan, G. (1990). The skilled helper: A systematic approach to effective helping (4th ed.). Belmont, CA, US: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
- Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 101-131.
- Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. (2013). The future of employment. How susceptible are jobs to computerisation.
- Goldstein, A. P., & Michaels, G. Y. (1985). Empathy: Development, training, and consequences. Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Hanson, N.R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. London : Cambridge University Press
- Herbert, S.(1971). 'Darwin, Malthus, and selection'. Journal of the History of Biology. 4. 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00356983
- Hoffman, M. L. (1984). Empathy, its limitations, and its role in a comprehensive moral theory. In J. Gerwitz & W. Kurtines (Ends.). Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development, (pp. 283-302). New York: Wiley.
- Howe, D. (2012). Empathy: What it is and why it matters. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hwang, Hee-sook (2018). Thought Experiments: on the Working Imagination and its Limitation. philosophical studies, 146, 307-328.
- Isaacson, W. (2008). Einstein: His life and universe. Simon and Schuster.
- Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Learning to feel like a scientist. Science Education, 100(2), 189-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21202
- Jung, D. (2017). Double Helix and X-ray Diffraction Photograph of DNA-Can the Data used to construct aHypothesis be Evidence to the Hypothesis? -. Korean Journal of Philosophy, 132, 237-264. https://doi.org/10.18694/KJP.2017.08.132.237
- Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
- Keyes, T. (1997). Instantaneous normal mode approach to liquid state dynamics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 101(16), 2921-2930. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp963706h
- Kim, C., Jo, J., Kim, B., Kim, Ye., Pak, C., I Y., Jang, M., Ju, Ch., Hong, H., Yun, H., & Cha, S. (2012). Long-term Vision of National Education: Educational Vision and Strategy for the Next 10 Years (gug-ga-gyo-yug-ui jang-gi-bi-jeon: hyang-hu 10nyeon-ui gyo-yug-bi-jeon-gwa jeon-lyag) (CR2011-106). Chungbuk: Korean Educational Development Institute
- Kim, G. (1997). Physics of Galileo. Seoul; Bumyeongsa, 241-255.
- Kim, T. (2015). A Study on Empathy. Elementary Moral Education, 47, 1-27.
- Kim, Y., Seo, H., & Park, J. (2013). An analysis on problem-finding patterns of well-known creative scientists. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 33(7), 1285-1299. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1285
- Klahr, D., & Simon, H. A. (1999). Studies of scientific discovery: Complementary approaches and convergent findings. Psychological Bulletin, 125(5), 524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.524
- Krznaric, R. (2014). Empathy: A handbook for revolution. Random House
- Kragel, P. A., & LaBar, K. S. (2015). Multi-variate neural bio-markers of emotional states are categorically distinct. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(11), 1437-1448. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv032
- Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Lawson, A. E. (2002). What does Galileo's discovery of Jupiter's moons tell us about the process of scientific discovery? Science & Education, 11, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013048828150
-
Lee Choong Hoon. (2014). Une <
> anticipee et prepare par Lavoisier:idee et perspective de la revolution lavoisienne de la chimie. Revue d'Etudes Francophones, 24, 287-320. - Lee, J., You S., & Lee, Y. (2014b). A Study on the Development of Empathy based Learning Model. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 30(4), 151-177. https://doi.org/10.14333/KJTE.2014.30.4.151
- Lee, Y., Yoon, J., Hong, S., Lim, J., Baek, B. (2018). A Meta-Analysis of the New Challenges and Approaches for Future Education. Journal of Education & Culture, 24(5), 127-153.
- Lemke, J. L. (1995). Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics Taylor & Francis. Inc. Bristol, PA Google Scholar.
- Lim, S. (2005). Trends and significance of research about beliefs in physics education and cultural approaches. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 25(3), 371-381
- Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196101010-00004
- Mansfield, R. S., & Busse, T. V. (1981). The psychology of creativity and discovery: Scientists and their work. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
- Marton, F., Fensham, P., & Chaiklin, S. (1994). A Nobel's eye view of scientific intuition: discussions with the Nobel prize-winners in physics, chemistry and medicine (1970-86). International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 457-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069940160406
- Martin, R. L. (2010). Design thinking. (Lee, G. Trans.). Soeul: Ungjinwingseu. (Original work published in 2009).
- Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 Science curriculum (Notification No.2015-74 of the Ministry of Education).
- Millar, A. I. (2000). Insights of genius: Imagery and creativity in science and art. London, UK: The MIT Press.
- Mun, J., Mun, K., Kim, S-W (2013). Scientists'Perceptions of Imagination and Characteristics of the Scientific Imagination. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(7), 1403-1417. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1403
- National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. National Committee for Science Education Standards and Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
- National Research Council (NRC). 2011. A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Newton, C., & Wells, B. (1999). The development of between-word processes in the connected speech of children aged between three and seven. Whurr Publishers Ltd.
- OECD. (2013). PISA 2015 Draft collaborate problem solving framework, March 2013. Paris: OECD publishing.
- OECD (2016). Global competency for an inclusive world. Paris: OECD publishing.
- Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simmon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 41(10), 994-1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
- Park, J. (2010). Future Education Vision Research (Mirae gyoyung bijeon yeongu). Chungbuk: Korean Educational Development Institute.
- Park, S. (2004). Empathy: Yesterday and Today (kong-kam-hak: eo-je-wa o-neul). Hakjisa: Seoul.
- Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: "Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
- Prisecaru, P. (2016). Challenges of the fourth industrial revolution. Knowledge Horizons. Economics, 8(1), 57.
- Rifkin, J. (2009). The empathic civilization: The race to global consciousness in a world in crisis Penguin (Lee, K. Trans.). Seoul: Mineumsa. (Original work published in 2009).
- Root-Bernstein, R. S., & Root-Bernstein, M. M. (2007). Sparks of genius. (Park, J. Trans.). Seoul: Ekoui seojae. (Original work published in 2001).
- Roth, W.-M. (2007). Mathematical modeling "in the wild": A case of hot cognition. In R. Lesh, E. Hamilton, & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future of mathematics education (pp. 77-97). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Ruse, M. (2010). Science and spirituality: Making room for faith in the age of science. Cambridge University Press.
- Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76, 559-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760602
- Saarimaki, H., Gotsopoulos, A., Jaaskelainen, I. P., Lampinen, J., Vuilleumier, P., Hari, R., Sams, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2016). Discrete Neural Signatures of Basic Emotions. Cerebral Cortex, 26(6),2563-2573. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv086
- Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York: Basic Books Press.
- Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Perry, D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132(3), 617-627 https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn279
- Smith, A. (2006). Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. The Psychological Record, 56(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395534
- Song, S. (2007). But the Earth is spinning? Galileo Galile. The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, 47(9), 29-32.
- Turner, J. H. (2009). The sociology of emotions: Basic theoretical arguments. Emotion Review, 1(4), 340-354 https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073909338305
- Warnock, M. (1976). Imagination. London: Faber.
- Watson, J. D. (1968). The Double Helix: Being a Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. New York, Atheneum.
- Yang, I. H., Jeong, J. W., Kim, Y. S., Kim, M. K., & Cho, H. J. (2006). Analyses of the aims of laboratory activity, interaction, and inquiry process within laboratory instruction in secondary school science. Journal of the Korean earth science society, 27(5), 509-520.
- Yerrick, R., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Introduction: The role of language in science learning and teaching. Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research, 1-18.
- Zembal-Saul, C., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2002). Elementary student teachers' science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 443-463. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10032
Cited by
- 디자인씽킹 기반 고등학교 화학 수업의 효과 연구 vol.64, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.3.159