Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of thermal and chemical treatment on the mechanical properties of E110 and E110G cladding tubes

  • Kiraly, M. (Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre for Energy Research, Fuel and Reactor Materials Department) ;
  • Hozer, Z. (Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre for Energy Research, Fuel and Reactor Materials Department) ;
  • Horvath, M. (Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre for Energy Research, Fuel and Reactor Materials Department) ;
  • Novotny, T. (Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre for Energy Research, Fuel and Reactor Materials Department) ;
  • Perez-Fero, E. (Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre for Energy Research, Fuel and Reactor Materials Department) ;
  • Ver, N. (Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre for Energy Research, Fuel and Reactor Materials Department)
  • Received : 2018.08.23
  • Accepted : 2018.11.02
  • Published : 2019.04.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The mechanical and corrosion behavior of the Russian zirconium fuel cladding alloy E110, predominantly used in VVERs, has been investigated for many decades. The recent commercialization of a new, optimized E110 alloy, produced on a sponge zirconium basis, gave the opportunity to compare the mechanical properties of the old and the new E110 fuel claddings. Axial and tangential tensile test experiments were performed with samples from both claddings in the MTA EK. Due to the anisotropy of the cladding tubes, the axial tensile strength was 10-15% higher than the tangential (measured by ring tensile tests). The tensile strength of the new E110G alloy was 11% higher than that of the E110 cladding at room temperature. Some samples underwent chemical treatment - slight oxidation in steam or hydrogenation - or heat treatment - in argon atmosphere at temperatures between 600 and $1000^{\circ}C$. The heat treatment during the oxidation had more significant effect on the tensile strength of the claddings than the oxidation itself, which lowered the tensile strength as the thickness of the metal decreased. The hydrogenation of the cladding samples slightly lowered the tensile strength and the samples but they remained ductile even at room temperature.

Keywords

References

  1. J.P. Mardon, D. Charquet, J. Senevat, M. Griffiths, B.D. Warr, A. Stasser, J.R. Theaker, H. Rosenbaum, B. Cheng, Influence of composition and fabrication process on out-of-pile and in-pile properties of M5 alloy, in: Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: 12th International Symposium, STP1354, 2000, pp. 505-523.
  2. E. Perez-Fero, T. Novotny, Z. Hozer, M. Kunstar, High temperature oxidation experiments with sponge base E110G cladding, in: Proceedings, 10th International Conference on WWER Fuel Performance, Modelling and Experimental Support, 7-14 September, Sandanski, Bulgaria, 2013. ISSN 1313-4531.
  3. Z. Hozer, E. Perez-Fero, T. Novotny, I. Nagy, M. Horvath, A. Pinter-Csordas, A. Vimi, M. Kunstar, T. Kemeny, Experimental comparison of the behavior of E110 and E110G claddings at high temperature, in: Zirconium In The Nuclear Industry: 17th International Symposium, STP1543, 2015, pp. 932-951.
  4. S.A. Nikulin, A.B. Rozhnov, V.A. Belov, E.V. Li, V.S. Glazkina, Influence of chemical composition of zirconium alloy E110 on embrittlement under LOCA conditions- Part 1: oxidation kinetics and macrocharacteristics of structure and fracture, J. Nucl. Mater. 418 (2011) 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.07.017
  5. P. Rudling, R.B. Adamson, Zirat Special Topical Report on Manufacturing (Zirat-5), Advanced Nuclear Technology Sweden AB, ANT, 2000.
  6. P.V. Shebaldov, M.M. Peregud, A.V. Nikulina, Y.K. Bibilashvili, A.F. Lositski, N.V. Kuz'menko, V.I. Belov, A.E. Novoselov, E110 alloy cladding tube properties and their interrelation with alloy structure-phase condition and impurity content, in: Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: 12th International Symposium, STP1354, 2000, pp. 545-559.
  7. J. Riha, P. Sutta, Phase transformations of E110G Zr-alloy observed by "in situ" XRD, Mater. Struct. (Bulletin of the Czech and Slovak Crystallographic Association) 22 (2015) 82-85.
  8. V. A. Markelov, A. G. Malgin, V. V. Novikov, Providing durability in a LOCA design basis accident of fuel rod claddings made of electrolytic zirconium E110 alloy. Water Reactor Fuel Performance Meeting, 10-14 September 2017, Jeju Island, South Korea.
  9. S.A. Nikulin, A.B. Rozhnov, A.Yu Gusev, T.A. Nechaykina, M.Yu Zadorozhny, Fracture resistance of Zr-Nb alloys under low-cycle fatigue tests, J. Nucl. Mater. 446 (2014) 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.11.039
  10. A.V. Nikulina, V.F. Konkov, V.N. Shishov, M.M. Peregud, T.N. Khokhunova, N.Y. Gorskaya, L.P. Sinelnikov, O.A. Golosov, Interrelation of alloy composition of zirconium Nb-containing alloys with corrosion and mechanical properties, in: 7th Russian Conference on Reactor Material Science, Russian Federation, Dimitrovgrad, 2003.
  11. L. Yegorova, et al., Database on the behavior of high burnup fuel rods with Zr1%Nb cladding and UO2 fuel (VVER type) under reactivity accident conditions, NUREG/IA-0156 2 (July 1999).
  12. A. Griger, L. Maroti, L. Matus, P. Windberg, Ambient and High Temperature Mechanical Properties of ZrNb1 Cladding with Different Oxygen and Hydrogen Content, Enlarged Halden Programme Group Meeting, 24-29, Loen, Norway, May 1999.
  13. M. Kiraly, D.M. Antok, M. Horvath, Z. Hozer, Evaluation of axial and tangential ultimate tensile strength of zirconium cladding tubes, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 50 (2018) 425-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.01.002
  14. N.M. Vlasov, I.I. Fedik, Hydrogen embrittlement of zirconium alloys, Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 45 (2003) 328-331. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027353023401
  15. M. Grosse, M. Steinbrueck, E. Lehmann, P. Vontobel, Kinetics of hydrogen absorption and release in zirconium alloys during steam oxidation, Oxid. Metals 70 (2008) 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11085-008-9113-2
  16. R. Thorpe, I.O. Smith, Tensile properties of Zr-wt1%Nb alloy, J. Nucl. Mater. 78 (1978) 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(78)90503-2
  17. A.V. Nikulina, V.A. Markelov, M.M. Peregud, Y.K. Bibiasvili, V.A. Kotrehkov, A.F. Lositsky, N.V. Kuzmenko, Y.P. Shevin, V.K. Shamardin, G.P. Kobylyansky, A.E. Novoselov, Zirconium alloy E635 as a material for fuel rod cladding and other components of VVER and RBMK Cores, in: Zirconium in the nuclear industry: 11th International Symposium, STP1295, 1996, pp. 785-804.
  18. J. Vesely, M. Valach, Z. Frejtich, V. Priman, Creep properties of non-irradiated ZrNb1 cladding tubes under normal and abnormal storage conditions, IAEA-Tecdoc 1089 (1998) 305-312.
  19. A. Kaplar, L. Yegorova, K. Lioutov, A. Konobeyev, N. Jouravkova, Mechanical properties of unirradiated and irradiated Zr-1% Nb cladding, NUREG/IA-0199 (2001).

Cited by

  1. Novel α + β Zr Alloys with Enhanced Strength vol.14, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020418
  2. Temelin Irradiated Cladding Project - TIRCLAD vol.1178, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1178/1/012041