DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Hydraulic consideration to improve the tractive force of sewage in sewer pipes using a storage tank

관로내 하수흐름의 전단응력 향상을 위한 저수조의 활용에 관한 수리적 고찰

  • Park, Kyoohong (Dept. of Civil Engineering at Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Yu, Soonyu (Dept. of Consilience, ADD at Korea Polytechnic University) ;
  • Lee, Taehoon (Dept. of Civil Engineering at Chung-Ang University)
  • 박규홍 (중앙대학교 사회기반시스템공학부) ;
  • 유순유 (한국산업기술대학교 지식융합학부) ;
  • 이태훈 (중앙대학교 사회기반시스템공학부)
  • Received : 2018.10.08
  • Accepted : 2019.03.04
  • Published : 2019.04.15

Abstract

If sewage flows for an extended time at low velocities, solids may be deposited in the sewer. Sufficient velocity or tractive force should be developed regularly to flush out any solids that may have been deposited during low flow periods. This study aims to evaluate the periods (T) during which sewage flow greater than the minimum tractive force maintains on a spot in sewer pipe system with lower tractive force or lower velocity than expected in the design step, when a storage tank installed in a place upsteam pours water into the sewer. The effect to T of design factors of storage tank and sewer pipes was evaluated assuming the uniform flow in sewers. When the area of orifice in the storage tank is $0.062m^2$(or 0.28 m diameter), the maximum T of 31sec was maintained using the usually used preset range of values of several design factors. As the horizontal cross section of storage tank and water depth of storage tank and roughness in sewers increase, T linearly increases. Also, T linearly decreases as the diameter of a sewer pipe increases. Although T gradually decreases as the sewer pipe slope decreases to around 0.005, T decreases sharply when the slope is less than 0.003.

Keywords

References

  1. ASCE and WPCF. (1970). Design and construction of sanitary and storm sewers, American Society of Civil Engineers Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practices, No. 37.
  2. Butler, D. and Clark, P. (1995). Sediment Management in Urban Drainage Catchments (No. 134).
  3. Brombach, H., Michelbach, S., and Wohrle, C. (1992). Sedimentation- und Remobilisierungs vorgange NEIDERSCHLAG, Eigenverlag Umwelt- und fluidtechnik GmbH, Bad Mergentheim.
  4. CIRIA. (1986). Sediment Movement in Combined Sewerage and Storm-water Drainage Systems. Phase 1. Project Report.
  5. Ebtehaj, I., Bonakdari, H. and Zaji, A.H. (2018). A new hybrid decision tree method based on two artificial neural networks for predicting sediment transport in clean pipes, Alex. Eng. J., 57, 1783-1795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2017.05.021
  6. Kim Y.R., Whang S.H., Yoon S.Y., Shim J.Y., and Jung J.A., Seoul Metropolitan Government. (2013). Performance analysis and quality improvement measure of comprehensive sewage pipe rehabilitation projects.
  7. Lindholm, O.G. (1984). "Pollutant loads from combined sewer systems", Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Urban storm drainage, Gothenburg, Sweden, Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1602-1616.
  8. Lysne, D.K. (1969). Hydraulic design of self-cleaning sewage tunnels, J, Sanit. Eng. Division, 95(SA1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSEDAI.0000937
  9. Macke, E. (1982). "About sedimentation at low concentrations in partly filled pipes", Mitteilungen, LeichtweissDInstitut fuE r Wasserbau der Technischen, UniversitaE t Braunschweig., Braunschweig, Deutsche.
  10. May, R.W., Ackers, J.C., Butler, D., and John, S. (1996). Development of design methodology for self-cleansing sewers, Water Sci. Technol., 33(9), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1996.0210
  11. Merritt, L.B. (2009). Tractive force design for sanitary sewer self-cleansing, J. Environ. Eng., 135(12), 1338-1347. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000105
  12. Najafzadeh, M. and Bonakdari, H. (2016). Application of a neuro-fuzzy GMDH model for predicting the velocity at limit of deposition in storm sewers, J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract., 8(1), 06016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000249
  13. Park, K.H., Oh, J.I., Yoo, S.Y., Kang, B.J., Lee, T.H., Kang, S.J., and Kim, S.M., Korea Water and Wastewater Works Association. (2017). Study of sewage direct input plan in the combined sewer zone.
  14. Pisano, W.C., Barsanti, J., Joyce, J., Sorensen, H., and Fan, C.Y. (1998). Sewer and tank sediment flushing, case studies, US EPA, Office of research and development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, USA.
  15. Scandiaconsult (1974). Synopsis of Research Programme for Self-cleansing Sewers. Stockholm: Orrje.
  16. Vongvisessomjai, N., Tingsanchali, T., and Babel, M.S. (2010). Non-deposition design criteria for sewers with part-full flow, Urban Water J., 7(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620903242824
  17. Yao, K.M. (1974). Sewer line design based on critical shear stress, J. Environ. Eng. Division, 100(2), 507-520. https://doi.org/10.1061/JEEGAV.0000175
  18. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology. (2014). Development of odor control technology and policy making in sewer Pipe, 414-111-008, 2.
  19. Ministry of Environment. (2015). Manual of design, construction and maintenance for sewage odor reduction Ffacilities, Plan for case study of sewer odor mitigation in city center, 1.
  20. Ministry of Environment. (2017). Sewer design standards, KDS, 64 40 00 : 2017, 45.
  21. Seoul Metropolitan Government. (2009). The optimal minimum flow rate for preventing the deposition of the combined sewer pipe in DWF condition according to change of reoccurrence interval, 225-233
  22. Seoul Metropolitan Government. (2017). 2030 Sewer rehabilitation master plan, N-11.

Cited by

  1. Improving the Minimum Design Velocity of Sewage Pipes vol.21, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2021.21.5.263